Abdullah H, Skidmore AK, Darvishzadeh R, Heurich M (2019) Sentinel-2 accurately maps green-attack stage of European spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) compared with Landsat-8. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv 5:87–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.93
Afzal S, Nahrung HF, Lawson SA, Hayes RA (2024) How effective are push-pull semiochemicals as deterrents for bark beetles? A global meta-analysis of thirty years of research. InSects 14:812. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14100812
Ahmad S, Shahzad R, Jamil S, Tabassum J, Chaudhary MA, Atif RM, Iqbal MM, Monsur MB, Lv Y, Sheng Z, Ju L (2021) Regulatory aspects, risk assessment, and toxicity associated with RNAi and CRISPR methods. In: CRISPR and RNAi Systems, Elsevier, pp 687–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821910-2.00013-8
Aldea J, Dahlgren J, Holmström E, Löf M (2023) Current and future drought vulnerability for three dominant boreal tree species. Glob Change Biol 30:e17079. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17079
Alem S, Pavlis J, Urban J, Kucera J (2015) Pure and mixed plantations of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Cupressus lusitanica: their growth interactions and effect on diversity and density of undergrowth woody plants in relation to light. Open J for 5:375–386. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2015.54032
Annila E (1969) Influence of temperature upon the development and voltinism of Ips typographus L. (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Ann Zool Fenn 6(2):161–208
Ashraf MZ, Mogilicherla K, Sellamuthu G, Siino V, Levander F, Roy A (2023) Comparative gut proteomics study revealing adaptive physiology of Eurasian spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytinae). Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1157455
Aukema BH, Raffa KF (2005) Selective manipulation of predators using pheromones: responses to frontalin and ipsdienol pheromone components of bark beetles in the Great Lakes region. Agric for Entomol 7:193–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-9555.2005.00250.x
Aukema BH, Dahlsten DL, Raffa KF (2000a) Exploiting behavioral disparities among predators and prey to selectively remove pests: maximizing the ratio of bark beetles to predators removed during semiochemically based trap-out. Environ Entomol 29:651–660. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-29.3.651
Aukema BH, Dahlsten DL, Raffa KF (2000b) Improved population monitoring of bark beetles and predators by incorporating disparate behavioral responses to semiochemicals. Environ Entomol 29:618–629. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-29.3.618
Averbeke AV, Gregoire JC (1995) Establishment and spread of Rhizophagus grandis Gyll. (Coleoptera: Rhizophagidae) 6 years after release in the Forêt domaniale du Mézenc (France). Ann Sci for 52:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19950305
Ayres MP, Wilkens RT, Ruel JJ, Lombardero MJ, Vallery E (2000) Nitrogen budgets of phloem-feeding bark beetles with and without symbiotic fungi. Ecology 81:2198–2210. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2198:NBOPFB]2.0.CO;2
Baier P, Pennerstorfer J, Schopf A (2007) PHENIPS—a comprehensive phenology model of Ips typographus (L.) (Col., Scolytinae) as a tool for hazard rating of bark beetle infestation. For Eco Manag 249:171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.05.020
Bakri A, Mehta K, Lance DR, Dyck VA, Hendrichs J, Robinson AS (2021) Sterilizing insects with ionizing radiation. Sterile Insect Tech Princ Pract Area-Wide Integr Pest Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4051-2_9
Balanyá J, Oller JM, Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Serra L (2006) Global genetic change tracks global climate warming in Drosophila subobscura. Science 313:1773–1775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131002
Barratt BI, Moran VC, Bigler F, Van Lenteren JC (2018) The status of biological control and recommendations for improving uptake for the future. Biocontrol 63:155–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9831-y
Barrette J, Achim A, Auty D (2023) Impact of intensive forest management practices on wood quality from conifers: literature review and reflection on future challenges. Curr for Rep 9:101–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-023-00181-6
Basso JV, Labbe R, Scott-Dupree C (2023) Assessing the sterility and quality of gamma-irradiated pepper weevils, Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), toward the development of the sterile insect technique. Pest Manag Sci 80:1692–1701. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7898
Battisti A, Stastny M, Buffo E, Larsson S (2006) A rapid altitudinal range expansion in the pine processionary moth produced by the 2003 climatic anomaly. Glob Chang Biol 12:662–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01124.x
Bazzaz FA, Chiariello NR, Coley PD, Pitelka LF (1987) Allocating resources to reproduction and defense. Bioscience 37:58–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1310178
Beghin JC, Gustafson CR (2021) Consumer valuation of and attitudes towards novel foods produced with new plant engineering techniques: a review. Sustainability 13:11348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011348
Bentz BJ, Rgnire J, Fettig CJ, Hansen EM, Hayes JL, Hicke JA, Kelsey RG, Negron JF, Seybold SJ (2010) Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. Bioscience 60:602–613. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.6
Berg EE, David Henry J, Fastie CL, De Volder AD, Matsuoka SM (2006) Spruce beetle outbreaks on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, and Kluane National Park and Reserve, Yukon Territory: relationship to summer temperatures and regional differences in disturbance regimes. For Ecol Manag 227:219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.038
Berryman AA (1972) Resistance of conifers to invasion by bark beetle-fungus associations. Bioscience 22:598–602. https://doi.org/10.2307/1296206
Berryman AA, Raffa KF, Millstein JA, Chr N (1989) Interaction dynamics of bark beetle aggregation and conifer defense rates. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565345
Berthelot S, Frühbrodt T, Hajek P, Nock CA, Dormann CF, Bauhus J, Fründ J (2021) Tree diversity reduces the risk of bark beetle infestation for preferred conifer species, but increases the risk for less preferred hosts. J Ecol 109:2649–2661. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13672
Biedermann PHW, Müller J, Grégoire JC, Gruppe A, Hagge J, Hammerbacher A, Hofstetter RW, Kandasamy D, Kolarik M, Kostovcik M, Krokene P, Sallé A, Six DL, Turrini T, Vanderpool D, Wingfield MJ, Bässler C (2019) Bark beetle population dynamics in the anthropocene: challenges and solutions. Trends Ecol Evol 34:914–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.06.002
Billings RF, Cameron RS (1984) Kairomonal responses of Coleoptera, Monochamus titillator (Cerambycidae), Thanasimus dubius (Cleridae), and Temnochila virescens (Trogositidae), to behavioral chemicals of southern pine bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ Entomol 13:1542–1548. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/13.6.1542
Birgersson G, Leufvén A (1988) The influence of host tree response to Ips typographus and fungal attack on production of semiochemicals. Insect Biochem 18:761–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1790(88)90098-4
Birgersson G, Schlyter F, Löfqvist J, Bergström G (1984) Quantitative variation of pheromone components in the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus from different attack phases. J Chem Ecol 10:1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987511
Blaženec M, Majdák A, Jakuš R (2021) Improvement of Ips typographus catches in pheromone trap barriers by altering of sex assigned pheromone blends. Folia Oecol 48(1):25–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2021-0003
Bleiker KP, Six DL (2007) Dietary benefits of fungal associates to an eruptive herbivore: potential implications of multiple associates on host population dynamics. Environ Entomol 36:1384–1396. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/36.6.1384
Blödner C, Majcherczyk A, Kües U, Polle A (2007) Early drought-induced changes to the needle proteome of Norway spruce. Tree Physiol 27:1423–1431. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/27.10.1423
Blomquist GJ, Figueroa-Teran R, Aw M, Song M, Gorzalski A, Abbott NL, Chang E, Tittiger C (2010) Pheromone production in bark beetles. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 40:699–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.07.013
Boone CK, Six DL, Raffa KF (2008) The enemy of my enemy is still my enemy: competitors add to predator load of a tree-killing bark beetle. Agric for Entomol 10:411–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-9563.2008.00402.x
Boone CK, Aukema BH, Bohlmann J, Carroll AL, Raffa KF (2011) Efficacy of tree defense physiology varies with bark beetle population density: a basis for positive feedback in eruptive species. Can J for Res 41:1174–1188. https://doi.org/10.1139/x11-041
Bradshaw WE, Holzapfel CM (2006) Evolutionary response to rapid climate change. Science 312:1477–1478. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127000
Bréda N, Huc R, Granier A, Dreyer E (2006) Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Ann for Sci 63:625–644. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006042
Campbell SA, Borden JH (2006) Integration of visual and olfactory cues of hosts and nonhosts by three bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecol Entomol 31:437–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00809.x
Candotti A, De Giglio M, Dubbini M, Tomelleri E (2022) A Sentinel-2 based multi-temporal monitoring framework for wind and bark beetle detection and damage mapping. Remote Sens 14:6105. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14236105
Carnol M, Baeten L, Branquart E, Grégoire JC, Heughebaert A, Muys B, Ponette Q, Verheyen K (2014) Ecosystem services of mixed species forest stands and monocultures: comparing practitioners’ and scientists’ perceptions with formal scientific knowledge. Forestry 87:639–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpu024
Caudullo G, Tinner W, de Rigo D (2016) Picea abies in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A (eds) European atlas of forest tree species. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, pp 114–116
Chakraborty A, Ashraf MZ, Modlinger R, Synek J, Schlyter F, Roy A (2020a) Unravelling the gut bacteriome of Ips (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae): identifying core bacterial assemblage and their ecological relevance. Sci Rep 10:18572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75203-5
留言 (0)