ARAUJO, S.F. (2019). A role for the history of psychology in theoretical and philosophical psychology. In: T. TEO (ed.), Re-envisioning theoretical psychology, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 111-129.

BELTZ, A., WRIGHT, A., SPRAGE, B., MOLENAAR, P. (2016). Bridging the nomothetic and idiographic approaches to the analysis of clinical data. In: «Assessment», vol. XXIII, n. 4, pp. 447-458.

BRONOWSKI, J. (1956). Science and human values, Julian Messner, New York.

BUTTERFIELD, H. (1931). The Whig interpretation of history, G. Bell & Sons, London.

CHANG, H. (2021). Presentist history for pluralist science. In: «Journal for General Philosophy of Science», vol. LII, n. 1, pp. 97-114.

COLLINI, (2012). Introduction. In: C.P. SNOW, The two cultures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. vii-lxxiii.

DIEMER, A. (1974). Geisteswissenschaften. In: J. RITTER (Hrsg.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Band III, Schwabe, Basel, pp. 211-215.

DIERSE, U. (2003). Das Begriffspaar Naturwissenschaften – Geisteswissenschaften bis zu Dilthey. In: G. KÜHNE-BETRAM, H.-U. LESSING, V. STEENBLOCK (Hrsg.), Kultur verstehen. Zur Geschichte und Theorie der Geisteswissenschaften, Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg, pp. 15-33.

DILTHEY, W. (1977a). Ideas concerning a descriptive and analytic psychology. In: W. DILTHEY, Descriptive psychology and historical understanding, translated by R.M. ZANER, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 21-120 (Original edition: Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie, Verlag der Königlischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1894).

DILTHEY, W. (1977b). The understanding of other persons and their expressions of life. In: W. DILTHEY, Descriptive psychology and historical understanding, translated by K.L. HEIGES, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 121-144 (Original edition: Das Verstehen anderer Personen und ihre Lebensäusserungen (1910). In: W. DILTHEY, Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. VII: Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften, hrsg. von B. GROETHUYSEN, Teubner, Leipzig/Berlin 1927, pp. 205-227).

DILTHEY, W. (1989). Introduction to the human sciences. In: R. MAKKREEL F. RODI (eds.), Wilhelm Dilthey: Selected works, vol. I, translated by M. NEVILLE, Princeton University Press, Princeton (NJ) (Original edition: Einleitung in die Gesteswissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 1883).

EBBINGHAUS, H. (1896). Über erklärende und beschreibende Psychologie. In: «Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane», Bd. IX, pp. 161-205.

FREEMAN, M. (2020). Psychology as literature: Narrative knowing and the project of the psychological humanities. In: J. SUGARMAN, J. MARTIN (eds.), A humanities approach to the psychology of personhood, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 30-48.

FREEMAN, M. (2024). Toward the psychological humanities: A modest manifesto for the future of psychology, Routledge, London/New York.

HACKING, I. (2002). Historical ontology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA).

HAMANN, J. (2014). Die Bildung der Geisteswissenschaften. Zur Genese einer sozialen Konstruktion zwischen Diskurs und Feld, UVK Verlagsgesellschaft, Kon-stanz/München.

HELD, B. (2021). Taking the humanities seriously. In: «Review of General Psychology», vol. XXV, n. 2, pp. 119-133.

JARDINE, N. (2000). Uses and abuses of anachronism in the history of the sciences. In: «History of Science», vol. XXXVIII, pp. 251-270.

KIRSCHNER, S. (2020). Challenges for a psychological humanities. In: J. SUGARMAN, J. MARTIN (eds.), A humanities approach to the psychology of personhood, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 101-118.

KOCH, S. (1959a). Psychology. A study of a science, 3 voll., McGraw-Hill, New York.

KOCH, S. (1959b). Epilogue to study I. In: S. KOCH (ed.), Psychology: A study of a science, vol. III, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 729-288.

KOCH, S. (1961). Psychological science versus the science-humanism antinomy: Intimations on a significant science of man. In: «American Psychologist», vol. XVI, n. 10, pp. 629-639.

KOCH, S. (1973). The image of man in encounter groups. In: «The American Scholar», vol. XLII, n. 4, pp. 636-652.

KOCH, S. (1992). POSTSCRIPT. In: S. KOCH, D. LEARY (eds.), A century of psychology as a science, APA Press, Washington (DC), pp. 951-968.

KOCH, S. (1993). “Psychology” or “The Psychological Studies”?. In: «American Psychologist», vol. XLVIII, n. 8, pp. 902-904.

KOCH, S. (1999). The allures of a meaning in modern psychology. In: S. KOCH, Psychology in human context, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 233-266.

KUHN, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

LAMIELL, J. (1998). “Nomothetic” and “Idiographic”: Contrasting Windelband’s understanding with contemporary usage. In: «Theory & Psychology», vol. VIII, n. 1, pp. 23-28.

LESSING, H.-U. (1984). Die Idee einer Kritik der historischen Vernunft, Karl Alber, München.

LESSING, H.-U. (2001). Wilhelm Diltheys „Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften“, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.

LOISON, L. (2016). Forms of presentism in the history of science. Rethinking the project of historical epistemology. In: «Studies in History and Philosophy of Science», vol. LX, pp. 29-37.

MALICH, L., KELLER, D. (2020). Die Psychological Humanities als reflexives Moment der Psychologie. In: V. BALZ, L. MALICH (Hrsg.), Psychologie und Kritik. Formen der Psychologisierung nach 1945, Springer, Cham, pp. 87-113.

MAKKREEL, R. (1977). Introduction. In: W. DILTHEY, Descriptive psychology and historical understanding, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 1-20.

MAKKREEL, R. (2012). The emergence of the human sciences from the moral sciences. In: A. WOOD, S.S. HAHN (eds.), The Cambridge history of philosophy in the nineteenth century (1790-1870), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 293-322.

MAKKREEL, R., RODI, F. (1989). Preface to all volumes. In: R. MAKKREEL, F. RODI (eds.), Wilhelm Dilthey: Selected works, vol. I, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. xiii-xv.

MARTIN, J. (2017). Carl Rogers’ and B. F. Skinner’s approaches to personal and societal improvement: A study in the psychological humanities. In: «Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology», vol. XXXVII, n. 4, pp. 214-229.

MARTIN, J. (2020a). A proposal for a general psychology of persons and their lives. In: «Review of General Psychology», vol. XXIV, n. 2, pp. 110-117.

MARTIN, J. (2020b). Methods of life writing for a psychology of persons. In: J. SUGARMAN, J. MARTIN (eds.), A humanities approach to the psychology of personhood, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 49-64.

MÜNSTERBERG, H. (1899). Psychology and history. In: «Psychological Review», vol. VI, n. 1, pp. 1-31.

ORESKES, N. (2013). Why I am a presentist. In: «Science in Context», vol. XXVI, n. 4, pp. 595-609.

ORTOLANO, G. (2008). The literature and the science of “two cultures” historiography. In: «Studies in History and Philosophy of Science», vol. XXXIX, pp. 143-150.

POLANYI, M. (1958). Personal knowledge, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

RICKMAN, H.P. (1976). Introduction. In: P.H. RICKMAN (ed.), W. Dilthey: Selected writings, University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles, pp. 1-31.

RIEDEL, M. (1995). Geisteswissenschaften. In: J. MITTEL-STRASS (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie, Band I, J.B. Metzler Verlag, Stuttgart/Weimar, pp. 724-728.

ROSS, S. (1962). Scientist: The story of a word. In: «Annals of Science», vol. XVIII, pp. 65-85.

SALVATORE, S., VALSINER, J. (2010). Between the general and the unique: Overcoming the nomothetic versus idiographic opposition. In: «Theory & Psychology», vol. XX, n. 6, pp. 817-833.

SMITH, R. (1988). Does the history of psychology have a subject?. In: «History of the Human Sciences», vol. I, n. 2, pp. 147-177.

SNOW, C.P. (1956). The two cultures. In: «The New Stateman», 6 October, 1956, p. 413.

SNOW, C.P. (2012a). The Rede lecture. In: C.P. SNOW, The two cultures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-51 (First edition 1959).

SNOW, C.P. (2012b). The two cultures: A second look. In: C.P. SNOW, The two cultures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 53-100 (First edition 1963).

SUGARMAN, J. (2020). Historical ontology: Exemplifying a psychological humanities of personhood. In: J. SUGARMAN, J. MARTIN (eds.), A humanities approach to the psychology of personhood, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 84-100.

TEICHERT, D. (2011). Geisteswissenschaften. In: H. REINALTER, P. BRENNER (Hrsg.), Lexikon der Geisteswissenschaften. Sachbegriffe – Disziplinen – Personen, Böhlau Verlag, Wien/Köln/Weimar, pp. 250-256.

TEO, T. (2017). From psychological science to the psychological humanities: Building a general theory of subjectivity. In: «Review of General Psychology», vol. XXI, n. 4, pp. 281-291.

TEO, T. (2020). Foreword. In: J. SUGARMAN, J. MARTIN (eds.), A humanities approach to the psychology of personhood, Routledge, London/New York, pp. vii-x.

THOMAE, H. (1999). The nomothetic-idiographic issue: Some roots and recent trends. In: «International Journal of Group Tensions», vol. XXVIII, n. 1-2, pp. 187-215.

WAITZ, T. (1849). Lehrbuch der Psychologie als Naturwissenschaft, Vieweg, Braunschweig.

WILLIAMS, R. (1999). A history of Division 24 (Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology). In: D. DEWSBURY (ed.), Unification through division: Histories of the Divisions of the American Psychological Association, vol. IV, APA Press, Washington (DC), pp. 65-89.

WINDELBAND, W. (1894). Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft. Rede zum Antritt des Rectorats der Kaiser-Wilhelms-Universität Strassburg, Heitz & Mündel, Strassburg.