Brandenburg JE, Eby SF, Song P, et al. Ultrasound Elastography: The new frontier in direct measurement of muscle stiffness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(11):2207. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APMR.2014.07.007.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastographypart 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34(2):169–84. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0033-1335205/ID/JR213-39.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sarvazyan A, Hall TJ, Urban MW, Fatemi M, Aglyamov SR, Garra BS. An overview of elastography-an emerging branch of medical imaging. Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2011;7(4):255-282. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340511798038684.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastographypart 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34(3):238–53. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0033-1335375/ID/JR313-37.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suthasmalee S, Moungmaithong S. Cervical shear wave elastography as a predictor of preterm delivery during 18–24 weeks of pregnancy. J Obstetr Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(11):2158–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOG.14094.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Nazzaro G, Saccone G, Miranda M, Crocetto F, Zullo F, Locci M. Cervical elastography using E-cervix for prediction of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies with threatened preterm labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(2):330–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1716721.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gesthuysen A, Hammer K, Mollers M, et al. Evaluation of cervical elastography strain pattern to predict preterm birth. Evaluation von Kompressionsmustern in der Zervix-Elastografie zur Vorhersage einer Fruhgeburt. 2020;41(4):397–403. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0865-1711.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wang B, Zhang Y, Chen S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting preterm delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2019;98(29):e16449. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016449.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jin B, Kong W, Zhao X, et al. Substrate stiffness affects the morphology, proliferation, and radiosensitivity of cervical squamous carcinoma cells. Tissue Cell. 2022;74:101681. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2021.101681

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco A, Khalil H. Chapter 11: scoping reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (eds) JBI Reviewer's Manual. 2020. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12

Van Den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FPG, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):284–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/UOG.14806.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van den Bosch T, de Bruijn AM, de Leeuw RA, et al. Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(5):576–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/UOG.19096.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lazzeri L, Morosetti G, Centini G, et al. A sonographic classification of adenomyosis: interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of type and degree of the myometrial involvement. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):1154-1161.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2018.06.031.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Naftalin J, Hoo W, Nunes N, Holland T, Mavrelos D, Jurkovic D. Association between ultrasound features of adenomyosis and severity of menstrual pain. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(6):779–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15798.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Naftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, Mavrelos D, Holland T, Jurkovic D. How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(12):3432–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des332.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Naftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, Mavrelos D, Foo X, Jurkovic D. Is adenomyosis associated with menorrhagia? Hum Reprod. 2014;29(3):473–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/HUMREP/DET451.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pinzauti S, Lazzeri L, Tosti C, et al. Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18–30-year-old nulligravid women without endometriosis: Association with symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(6):730–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14834.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, et al. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(3):392–411. https://doi.org/10.1093/HUMUPD/DMZ049.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rasmussen CK, Hansen ES, Dueholm M. Inter-rater agreement in the diagnosis of adenomyosis by 2- and 3-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(3):657–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/JUM.14735.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu X, Ding D, Ren Y, Guo S-W. Transvaginal elastosonography as an imaging technique for diagnosing adenomyosis. Reproductive Sciences. 2018;25(4):498–514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117750752

Zhang DL, Liu XX, Tang JQ, et al. The value of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in preoperative prediction for efficacy of high-Intensity focused ultrasound uterine fibroids ablation. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):423–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2020.1758803.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Samanci C, Onal Y. Shearwave elastographic evaluation of uterine leiomyomas after uterine artery embolization: preliminary results. Turk J Med Sci. 2020;50(2):426–32. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1908-171.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pongpunprut S, Panburana P, Wibulpolprasert P, et al. A comparison of shear wave elastography between normal myometrium, uterine fibroids, and adenomyosis: a cross-sectional study. Int J Fertil Steril. 2022;16(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.22074/IJFS.2021.523075.1074.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Görgülü FF, Okçu NT. Which imaging method is better for the differentiation of adenomyosis and uterine fibroids?. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(5):102002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102002

Stoelinga B, Hehenkamp WJKK, Brolmann HAM, et al. Real-time elastography for assessment of uterine disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(2):218–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12519.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Acar S, Millar E, Mitkova M, Mitkov V. Value of ultrasound shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Ultrasound. 2016;24(4):205–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X16673677.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ding D, Chen Y, Liu X, Jiang Z, Cai X, Guo SW. Diagnosing deep endometriosis using transvaginal elastosonography. Reprod Sci. 2020;27(7):1411–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43032-019-00108-2.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wozniak S, Czuczwar P, Szkodziak P, et al. Elastography improves the accuracy of ultrasound in the preoperative assessment of abdominal wall endometriosis. Ultraschall Med. 2015;36(6):623–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0034-1398834.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aljuraifani R, Stafford RE, Hug F, Hodges PW. Female striated urogenital sphincter contraction measured by shear wave elastography during pelvic floor muscle activation: Proof of concept and validation. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(1):206–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/NAU.23275.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baumfeld Y, Wei Q, Chitnis P, Marroquin J, Shobeiri SA, Alshiek J. Does aging affect the elastic properties of the bladder and the urethra in nulliparous women: An ultrasound shear-wave elastography study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41(3):797–805. https://doi.org/10.1002/NAU.24877.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sheyn D, Ahmed Y, Azar N, El-Nashar S, Hijaz A, Mahajan S. Trans-abdominal ultrasound shear wave elastographyfor quantitative assessment of female bladder neck elasticity. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(5):763–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00192-016-3193-3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kreutzkamp JM, Schäfer SD, Amler S, Strube F, Kiesel L, Schmitz R. Strain elastography as a new method for assessing pelvic floor biomechanics. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017;43(4):868–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTRASMEDBIO.2016.12.004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gachon B, Fritel X, Pierre F, Nordez A. Transperineal ultrasound shear-wave elastography is a reliable tool for assessment of the elastic properties of the levator ani muscle in women. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-021-95012-8

Tang J, Zhong C, Wen W, Wu R, Liu Y, Du L. Quantifying levator ani muscle elasticity under normal and prolapse conditions by shear wave elastography: a preliminary study. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39(7):1379–1388. https://doi.org/10.1002/JUM.15232

Li XM, Zhang LM, Li Y, et al. Usefulness of transperineal shear wave elastography of levator ani muscle in women with stress urinary incontinence. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022;47(5):1873–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00261-022-03478-5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maßlo K, Möllers M, de Murcia KO, Klockenbusch W, Schmitz R. New method for assessment of levator avulsion injury: a comparative elastography study. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(5):1301–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/JUM.14810.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Altunkeser A, Inal ZO, Baran N. Evaluation of ovaries in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome using shear wave elastography. Curr Med Imaging. 2020;16(5):578–83. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405615666190114150538.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar