Drzewiecki BA, Bauer SB. Urodynamic testing in children: indications, technique, interpretation and significance. J Urol. 2011;186(4):1190–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2692.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wiener JS, et al. Challenges in pediatric urologic practice: a lifelong view. World J Urol. 2021;39(4):981–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03203-1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Almodhen F, Capolicchio JP, Jednak R, El Sherbiny M. Postpubertal urodynamic and upper urinary tract changes in children with conservatively treated myelomeningocele. J Urol. 2007;178(4 Pt 1):1479–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.171.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mosalakatane TD, et al. A 15-year retrospective review of urodynamic studies in children at Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, Cape town, South Africa. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22(1):401. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03462-4.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McGuire EJ, Woodside JR, Borden TA, Weiss RM. Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol. 1981;126(2):205–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)54449-3.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Valentini LG, et al. Occult spinal dysraphism: lessons learned by retrospective analysis of 149 surgical cases about natural history, surgical indications, urodynamic testing, and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013;29(9):1657–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2186-5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bael A, et al. The relevance of urodynamic studies for Urge syndrome and dysfunctional voiding: a multicenter controlled trial in children. J Urol. 2008;180(4):1486–93; discussion 1494-5,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.054.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hjalmas K. Urodynamics in normal infants and children. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1988;114:20–7. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3201164

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Swatesutipun V, Tangpaitoon T. The safety cutoff storage pressure for preventing upper urinary tract damage in neurogenic bladder from spinal cord pathology and risk factor analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41(4):991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24911.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Landau EH, Churchill BM, Jayanthi VR, Gilmour RF, Steckler RE, McLorie GA, Khoury AE. The sensitivity of pressure specific bladder volume versus total bladder capacity as a measure of bladder storage dysfunction. J Urol. 1994;152(5 Pt 1):1578–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32479-5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haylen BT, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0976-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schafer W, et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):261–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10066.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

DeWitt-Foy ME, Elliott SP. Neurogenic bladder:: assessment and operative management. Urol Clin North Am. 2022;49(3):519–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2022.04.010.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Selekman RE, Sanford MT, Ko LN, Allen IE, Copp HL. Does perception of catheterization limit its use in pediatric UTI? J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(1):48.e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.09.006.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rouse CM. Pediatric psychology in a urology division: unifying complex medical and mental health treatment. Curr Urol Rep. 2023;24(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01127-4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Snow-Lisy DC, Yerkes EB, Cheng EY. Update on urological management of spina bifida from prenatal diagnosis to adulthood. J Urol. 2015;194(2):288–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.107.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nitti VW, Kim Y, Combs AJ. Voiding dysfunction following transurethral resection of the prostate: symptoms and urodynamic findings. J Urol. 1997;157(2):600–3. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8996367

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rittenberg MH, Hulbert WC, Snyder HM 3rd, Duckett JW. Protective factors in posterior urethral valves. J Urol. 1988;140(5):993–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41908-2.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dudley AG, et al. Interrater reliability in interpretation of neuropathic pediatric urodynamic tracings: an expanded multicenter study. J Urol. 2018;199(5):1337–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.051.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Yerkes EB, et al. Translating pediatric urodynamics from clinic into collaborative research: Lessons and recommendations from the UMPIRE study group. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(5):716–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.05.004. The article presents a call to standardize the lexicon of UDS.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mills KR. The basics of electromyography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii32–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.069211.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mills KR. Specialised electromyography and nerve conduction studies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii36–40. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.068981.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mahajan ST, Fitzgerald MP, Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L. Concentric needle electrodes are superior to perineal surface-patch electrodes for electromyographic documentation of urethral sphincter relaxation during voiding. BJU Int. 2006;97(1):117–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05890.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Sakakibara R, Uchiyama T, Yamamoto T, Tateno F, Yamanishi T, Kishi M, Tsuyusaki Y. Sphincter EMG for diagnosing multiple system atrophy and related disorders. In: Naik GR, editor. Computational Intelligence in Electromyography Analysis - A Perspective on Current Applications and Future Challenges. InTech; 2012. Provides a very useful anatomic overview for needle EMG evaluation.

Google Scholar 

• Finkelstein JB, et al. Anxiety, distress, and pain in pediatric urodynamics. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(4):1178–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24339. Highlights UDS factors that affect patient and caregiver anxiety.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Anding R, Smith P, de Jong T, Constantinou C, Cardozo L, Rosier P. When should video and EMG be added to urodynamics in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction and is this justified by the evidence? ICI-RS 2014. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(2):331–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22894.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Jong TP, Klijn AJ. Urodynamic studies in pediatric urology. Nat Rev Urol. 2009;6(11):585–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2009.200.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Wang HS, Lee T, Thaker H, Mukkamala A, Feng C, Bauer SB, Estrada CR. Patch versus needle electromyography for evaluation of urinary spincter function - a direct comparison. Houston, TX: Societies of Pediatric Urology Fall 2023 Congress; 2023. Needle EMG evaluates bladder dysfunction in a nuanced fashion and can help obviate unnecessary surgical intervention.

Google Scholar 

Thacker PG, Collins HR, Hill J. Distress experienced during pediatric VCUGs - a granular, prospective assessment using the brief behavioral distress scale. Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46(5):660–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3540-z.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Phillips DA, Watson AR, MacKinlay D. Distress and the micturating cystourethrogram: does preparation help? Acta Paediatr. 1998;87(2):175–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08035259850157624.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yiou R, Audureau E, Loche CM, Dussaud M, Lingombet O, Binhas M. Comprehensive evaluation of embarrassment and pain associated with invasive urodynamics. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(2):156–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22521.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berk K, Powirtowska M, Blahuszewska A, Korzeniecka-Kozerska A. Retrospective evaluation of early risk factors in children with different types of micturition disorders. Acta Paediatr. 2019;108(6):1151–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14659.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Farhat W, Bagli DJ, Capolicchio G, O'Reilly S, Merguerian PA, Khoury A, McLorie GA. The dysfunctional voiding scoring system: quantitative standardization of dysfunctional voiding symptoms in children. J Urol. 2000;164(3 Pt 2):1011–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200009020-00023.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tanaka ST, et al. Baseline urinary tract imaging in infants enrolled in the UMPIRE protocol for children with spina bifida. J Urol. 2019;201(6):1193–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000141.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wallis MC, et al. Incidence of urinary tract infections in newborns with spina bifida-is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary? J Urol. 2021;206(1):126–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001690.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ouyang L, Bolen J, Valdez R, Joseph D, Baum MA, Thibadeau J. Characteristics and survival of patients with end stage renal disease and spina bifida in the United States renal data system. J Urol. 2015;193(2):558–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.092.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Metcalfe P. Nuances and pitfalls in pediatric urodynamics: perfecting imperfection. J Urol. 2021;205(2):333–4.