Surti S, Pantel AR, Karp JS. Total body PET: why, how, what for? IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2020;4(3):283–92.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kinahan PE, Townsend DW, Beyer T, Sashin D. Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys. 1998;25(10):2046–53.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Basu S, Hess S, Nielsen Braad PE, Olsen BB, Inglev S, Høilund-Carlsen PF. The basic principles of FDG-PET/CT imaging. PET Clin. 2014;9(4):355–70.
Leung EK, Judenhofer MS, Cherry SR, Badawi RD. Performance assessment of a software-based coincidence processor for the EXPLORER total-body PET scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(18):18NT01.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Uzuegbunam BC, Librizzi D, Hooshyar YB. PET radiopharmaceuticals for Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease diagnosis, the current and future landscape. Molecules. 2020;25(4):977.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Parent EE, Schuster DM. Update on 18F-fluciclovine PET for prostate cancer imaging. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(5):733–9.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vandenberghe S, Moskal P, Karp JS. State of the art in total body PET. EJNMMI Phys. 2020;7(1):35.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nadig V, Herrmann K, Mottaghy FM, Schulz V. Hybrid total-body pet scanners-current status and future perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(2):445–59.
Sartini L, Simeone F, Pani P, Bue NL, Marinaro G, Grubich A, Lobko A, Etiope G, Capone A, Favali P, Gasparoni F. GEMS: underwater spectrometer for long-term radioactivity measurements. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip. 2011;626–627:S145–7.
Bisogni MG, Morrocchi M. Development of analog solid-state photo-detectors for positron emission tomography. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip. 2016;809:140–8.
Jarron P, Auffray E, Brunner S E, et al. Time based readout of a silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) for Time Of Flight Positron Emission Tomography (TOF-PET). In: Nuclear science symposium conference record (NSS/MIC), 2009 IEEE. IEEE; 2009.
Surti S, Karp JS. Advances in time-of-flight PET. Phys Med. 2016;32(1):12–22.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Otte A, Barral J, Dolgoshein B, et al. A test of silicon photomultipliers as readout for PET. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res. 2005;545(3):705–15.
Newport DF, Siegel SB, Swann BK, et al. QuickSilver (TM): a flexible, extensible, and high-speed architecture for multi-modality imaging. In: Nuclear science symposium conference record, 2006. IEEE. IEEE; 2006.
Karakatsanis NA, Zhou Y, Lodge MA, Casey ME, Wahl RL, Zaidi H, Rahmim A. Generalized whole-body Patlak parametric imaging for enhanced quantification in clinical PET. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(22):8643–73.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Muzic RF Jr, DiFilippo FP. Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging: technical review. Semin Roentgenol. 2014;49(3):242–54.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Townsend D, et al. Basic science of PET and PET/CT. In: Valk P, Bailey D, Townsend D, et al., editors. Positron emission tomography. London: Springer; 2006. p. 1–16.
Pantel AR, Viswanath V, Karp JS. Update on the PennPET explorer: a whole-body imager with scalable axial field-of-view. PET Clin. 2021;16(1):15–23.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rausch I, Mannheim JG, Kupferschläger J, la Fougère C, Schmidt FP. Image quality assessment along the one metre axial field-of-view of the total-body Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system for 18F-FDG. EJNMMI Phys. 2022;9(1):87.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ng QK, Triumbari EKA, Omidvari N, Cherry SR, Badawi RD, Nardo L. Total-body PET/CT: first clinical experiences and future perspectives. Semin Nucl Med. 2022;52(3):330–9.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Altunay B, Morgenroth A, Beheshti M, Vogg A, Wong NCL, Ting HH, Biersack HJ, Stickeler E, Mottaghy FM. HER2-directed antibodies, affibodies and nanobodies as drug-delivery vehicles in breast cancer with a specific focus on radioimmunotherapy and radioimmunoimaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(5):1371–89.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Spencer BA, Berg E, Schmall JP, Omidvari N, Leung EK, Abdelhafez YG, Tang S, Deng Z, Dong Y, Lv Y, Bao J, Liu W, Li H, Jones T, Badawi RD, Cherry SR. Performance evaluation of the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner based on NEMA NU 2–2018 with additional tests to characterize PET scanners with a long axial field of view. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(6):861–70.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lan X, Fan K, Li K, Cai W. Dynamic PET imaging with ultra-low-activity of 18F-FDG: unleashing the potential of total-body PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(13):4138–41.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang X, Badawi RD, Cherry SR, Qi J. Theoretical study of the benefit of long axial field-of-view PET on region of interest quantification. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(13):135010.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Daube-Witherspoon ME, Viswanath V, Werner ME, Karp JS. Performance characteristics of long axial field-of-view PET scanners with axial gaps. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2021;5(3):322–30.
Alberts I, Hünermund JN, Prenosil G, et al. Clinical performance of long axial field of view PET/CT: a head-to-head intra-individual comparison of the Biograph Vision Quadra with the Biograph Vision PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(8):2395–404.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Honoré d’Este S, Andersen FL, Andersen JB, et al. Potential clinical impact of LAFOV PET/CT: a systematic evaluation of image quality and lesion detection. Diagnostics. 2023;13(21):3295.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Prenosil GA, Sari H, Fürstner M, et al. Performance characteristics of the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system with a long axial field of view using the NEMA NU 2–2018 standard. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(3):476–84.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cherry SR, Badawi RD, Karp JS, Moses WW, Price P, Jones T. Total-body imaging: transforming the role of positron emission tomography. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(381):eaaf6169.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cherry SR, Jones T, Karp JS, Qi J, Moses WW, Badawi RD. Total-body PET: maximizing sensitivity to create new opportunities for clinical research and patient care. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(1):3–12.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dai B, Daube-Witherspoon ME, McDonald S, et al. Performance evaluation of the PennPET explorer with expanded axial coverage. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68(9):095007.
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Leung EK, Berg E, Omidvari N, Spencer BA, Li E, Abdelhafez YG, Schmall JP, Liu W, He L, Tang S, Liu Y, Dong Y, Jones T, Cherry SR, Badawi RD. Quantitative accuracy in total-body imaging using the uEXPLORER PET/CT scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac287c.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pantel AR, Viswanath V, Daube-Witherspoon ME, et al. PennPET explorer: human imaging on a whole-body imager. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(1):144–51.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nardo L, Pantel AR. Oncologic applications of long axial field-of-view PET/computed tomography. PET Clin. 2021;16(1):65–73.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hu P, Zhang Y, Yu H, Chen S, Tan H, Qi C, Dong Y, Wang Y, Deng Z, Shi H. Total-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scan in oncology patients: how fast could it be? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(8):2384–94.
Chen W, Liu L, Li Y, Li S, Li Z, Zhang W, Zhang X, Wu R, Hu D, Sun H, Zhou Y, Fan W, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Hu Y. Evaluation of pediatric malignancies using total-body PET/CT with half-dose [18F]-FDG. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(12):4145–55.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sachpekidis C, Pan L, Kopp-Schneider A, Weru V, Hassel JC, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Application of the long axial field-of-view PET/CT with low-dose [18F]FDG in melanoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(4):1158–67.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Viswanath V, Pantel AR, Daube-Witherspoon ME, et al. Quantifying bias and precision of kinetic parameter estimation on the PennPET Explorer, a long axial field-of-view scanner. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2020;4(6):735–49.
留言 (0)