Jastrow H, Vollrath L. Teaching and learning gross anatomy using modern electronic media based on the visible human project. Clin Anat. 2003;16(1):44–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10062.

Article  Google Scholar 

Park JS, Chung MS, Hwang SB, Shin BS, Park HS. Visible Korean Human: its techniques and applications. Clin Anat. 2006;19(3):216–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20275.

Article  Google Scholar 

Narayanan S, Ananthy V. The influence of learning style in understanding analogies and 2D animations in embryology course. Anat Cell Biol. 2018;51(4):260–5. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2018.51.4.260.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bobek E, Tversky B. Creating visual explanations improves learning. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2016;1(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0031-6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mayer RE. Designing multimedia instruction in anatomy: an evidence-based approach. Clin Anat. 2020;33(1):2–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23265.

Article  Google Scholar 

van Merriënboer JJ, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):85–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wilson TD. Role of image and cognitive load in anatomical multimedia. In: Chan LK, Pawlina W, editors. Teaching anatomy: a practical guide. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International; 2015. p. 237–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08930-0_27.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Mahajan R, Gupta K, Gupta P, Kukreja S, Singh T. Multimedia instructional design principles: moving from theoretical rationale to practical applications. Indian Pediatr. 2020;57(6):555–60.

Article  Google Scholar 

Azzam MB, Easteal RA. Pedagogical strategies for the enhancement of medical education. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(6):2041–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01385-w.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hochstrasser K, Stoddard HA. Use of cognitive load theory to deploy instructional technology for undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. Med Sci Educ. 2022;32(2):553–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01499-1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Grech V. The application of the Mayer multimedia learning theory to medical PowerPoint slide show presentations. J Vis Commun Med. 2018;41(1):36–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2017.1408400.

Article  Google Scholar 

Issa N, Schuller M, Santacaterina S, et al. Applying multimedia design principles enhances learning in medical education. Med Educ. 2011;45(8):818–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03988.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hadie SNH, Abdul Manan Sulong H, Hassan A, Mohd Ismail ZI, Talip S, Abdul Rahim AF. Creating an engaging and stimulating anatomy lecture environment using the cognitive load theory-based lecture model: students’ experiences. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2018;13(2):162–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.11.001.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mitrousias V, Karachalios TS, Varitimidis SE, Natsis K, Arvanitis DL, Zibis AH. Anatomy learning from prosected cadaveric specimens versus plastic models: a comparative study of upper limb anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(4):436–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1911.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fenesi B, Mackinnon C, Cheng L, Kim JA, Wainman BC. The effect of image quality, repeated study, and assessment method on anatomy learning. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(3):249–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1657.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dettmer S, Tschernig T, Galanski M, Pabst R, Rieck B. Teaching surgery, radiology and anatomy together: the mix enhances motivation and comprehension. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32(8):791–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0694-5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Marker DR, Bansal AK, Juluru K, Magid D. Developing a radiology-based teaching approach for gross anatomy in the digital era. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(8):1057–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.02.016.

Article  Google Scholar 

Abid B, Hentati N, Chevallier JM, Ghorbel A, Delmas V, Douard R. Traditional versus three-dimensional teaching of peritoneal embryogenesis: a comparative prospective study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32(7):647–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0653-1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hadie SNH. Five tips for managing diagrams in anatomy lecture: the cognitive load theory perspective. Education in Medicine Journal. 2020;12(3):65–74. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2020.12.3.8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wainman B, Wolak L, Pukas G, Zheng E, Norman GR. The superiority of three-dimensional physical models to two-dimensional computer presentations in anatomy learning. Med Educ. 2018;52(11):1138–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13683.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gross MM, Wright MC, Anderson OS. Effects of image-based and text-based active learning exercises on student examination performance in a musculoskeletal anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(5):444–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1684.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vorstenbosch MA, Klaassen TP, Kooloos JG, Bolhuis SM, Laan RF. Do images influence assessment in anatomy? Exploring the effect of images on item difficulty and item discrimination. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(1):29–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1290.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rizzolo LJ, Stewart WB. Should we continue teaching anatomy by dissection when …? Anat Rec B New Anat. 2006;289(6):215–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.b.20117.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mangione S. You can observe a lot by watching. Cleve Clin J Med. 2019;86(7):440–2. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.86a.19056.

Article  Google Scholar 

Russell SW. Improving observational skills to enhance the clinical examination. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102(3):495–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2017.12.011.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jasani SK, Saks NS. Utilizing visual art to enhance the clinical observation skills of medical students. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):e1327–31. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.770131.

Article  Google Scholar 

Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(6):253–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.117.

Article  Google Scholar 

Marsh KR, Giffin BF, Lowrie DJ Jr. Medical student retention of embryonic development: impact of the dimensions added by multimedia tutorials. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1(6):252–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.56.

Article  Google Scholar 

Berney S, Bétrancourt M, Molinari G, Hoyek N. How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8(5):452–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1524.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rubin LR, Lackey WL, Kennedy FA, Stephenson RB. Using color and grayscale images to teach histology to color-deficient medical students. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(2):84–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.72.

Article  Google Scholar 

Naegle KM. Ten simple rules for effective presentation slides. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17(12):e1009554. Published 2021 Dec 2. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009554

Taylor DC, Hamdy H. Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Med Teach. 2013;35(11):1561–72. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.828153.

Article  Google Scholar 

Beermann J, Tetzlaff R, Bruckner T, et al. Three-dimensional visualisation improves understanding of surgical liver anatomy. Med Educ. 2010;44(9):936–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03742.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Choudhury B, Freemont A. Assessment of anatomical knowledge: approaches taken by higher education institutions. Clin Anat. 2017;30(3):290–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22835.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sagoo MG, Smith CF, Gosden E. Assessment of anatomical knowledge by practical examinations: the effect of question design on student performance. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(5):446–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1597.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yaqinuddin A, Zafar M, Ikram MF, Ganguly P. What is an objective structured practical examination in anatomy? Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(2):125–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1305.

Article  Google Scholar 

Clunie L, Morris NP, Joynes VCT, Pickering JD. How comprehensive are research studies investigating the efficacy of technology-enhanced learning resources in anatomy education? A systematic review Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(3):303–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1762.

Article  Google Scholar 

Donkin R, Rasmussen R. Student perception and the effectiveness of Kahoot!: a scoping review in histology, anatomy, and medical education. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(5):572–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2094.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mishall PL, Burton W, Risley M. Flashcards: the preferred online game-based study tool self-selected by students to review medical histology image content. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1406:209–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26462-7_10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Narayanan S, Shankar N, Ananthy V. Medical student’s perception to different types of set induction in anatomy lectures. Anat Cell Biol. 2019;52(3):296–301. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.19.016.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dao V, Yeh PH, Vogel KS, Moore CM. Applied neuroanatomy elective to reinforce and promote engagement with neurosensory pathways using interactive and artistic activities. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8(2):166–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1469.

Article  Google Scholar 

Subbiramaniyan V, Apte C, Ali MC. A meme-based approach for enhancing student engagement and learning in renal physiology. Adv Physiol Educ. 2022;46(1):27–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00092.2021.

Article  Google Scholar