Johnson W, Onuma O, Owolabi M, Sachdev S. Stroke: a global response is needed, (in eng), Bull World Health Organ, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 634-634a, Sep 1 2016.

Burton JK, et al. Predicting discharge to institutional long-term care after stroke: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(1):161–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mazzoleni S, Tran V-D, Dario P, Posteraro F. Wrist robot-assisted rehabilitation treatment in subacute and chronic stroke patients: from distal-to-proximal motor recovery. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, PP, pp. 1–1, 08/13 2018.

Winstein C, Kim B, Kim S, Martinez C, Schweighofer N. Dosage matters, (in eng), Stroke, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1831–1837, Jul 2019.

Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5. 05/14/ 2011, doi.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A, Donnan G. Inactive and Alone, Stroke, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1005–1009, 2004/04/01 2004, https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000120727.40792.40.

Bernhardt J, Chan J, Nicola I, Collier JM. Little therapy, little physical activity: rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care, (in eng). J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(1):43–8. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0013. 2007/01//.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Foley N, McClure JA, Meyer M, Salter K, Bureau Y, Teasell R. Inpatient rehabilitation following stroke: amount of therapy received and associations with functional recovery. Disabil Rehabil, 34, 25, pp. 2132–8, 2012/12/01 2012, https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.676145.

Ren Y, Wu YN, Yang CY, Xu T, Harvey RL, Zhang LQ. Developing a Wearable Ankle Rehabilitation Robotic device for in-Bed Acute Stroke Rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017;25(6):589–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2584003.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bernhardt J et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce. Int J Stroke, 12, 5, pp. 444–50, 2017/07/01 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017711816.

Dromerick AW, Critical Period After Stroke Study (CPASS). : A phase II clinical trial testing an optimal time for motor recovery after stroke in humans, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118, no. 39, p. e2026676118, 2021/09/28 2021, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026676118.

Wolf SL et al. Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Extremity Function 3 to 9 Months After StrokeThe EXCITE Randomized Clinical Trial, JAMA, vol. 296, no. 17, pp. 2095–2104, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.17.2095.

Wolf SL et al. The EXCITE stroke trial: comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy, (in eng), Stroke, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2309-15, Oct 2010, https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.588723.

Dromerick AW, Critical Period After Stroke Study (CPASS), et al. A phase II clinical trial testing an optimal time for motor recovery after stroke in humans, (in eng). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(39):e2026676118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026676118.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Levanon Y. The advantages and disadvantages of using high technology in hand rehabilitation. J Hand Ther. 2013;26(2):179–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2013.02.002.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Budhota A et al. Robotic Assisted Upper Limb Training Post Stroke: A Randomized Control Trial Using Combinatory Approach Toward Reducing Workforce Demands, (in English), Frontiers in Neurology, Clinical Trial vol. 12, 2021-June-02 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.622014.

Aguilera-Rubio Á, Alguacil-Diego IM, Mallo-López A, Cuesta-Gómez A. Use of the Leap Motion Controller® System in the Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb in Stroke. A systematic review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 31, 1, p. 106174, 2022/01/01/ 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106174.

Sadeghi Esfahlani S, Muresan B, Sanaei A, Wilson G. Validity of the Kinect and Myo armband in a serious game for assessing upper limb movement. Entertainment Comput, 27, pp. 150–6, 2018/08/01/ 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2018.05.003.

Almasi S et al. Kinect-Based Rehabilitation Systems for Stroke Patients: A Scoping Review, BioMed Research International, vol. 2022, p. 4339054, 2022/03/27 2022, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4339054.

Longo BB, Sime MM, Bastos-Filho T. Serious Game Based on Myo Armband for Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Exercises, in XXVI Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering, Singapore, R. Costa-Felix, J. C. Machado, and A. V. Alvarenga, Eds., 2019// 2019: Springer Singapore, pp. 701–704.

Marcos-Antón S, Jardón-Huete A, Oña-Simbaña ED, Blázquez-Fernández A, Martínez-Rolando L, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R. sEMG-controlled forearm bracelet and serious game-based rehabilitation for training manual dexterity in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 110,2023/08/19 2023, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01233-5.

Karashanov A, Manolova AH, Neshov NN. APPLICATION FOR HAND REHABILITATION USING LEAP MOTION SENSOR BASED ON A GAMIFICATION APPROACH, 2016.

Baranyi R, Körber Y, Galimov P, Parandeh Z, Grechenig T. Rehafox – A therapeutical approach developing a serious game to support rehabilitation of stroke patients using a leap motion controller. Clin eHealth, 6, pp. 85–95, 2023/12/01/ 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceh.2023.08.001.

Elnaggar A, Reichardt D. Digitizing the Hand Rehabilitation Using Serious Games Methodology with User-Centered Design Approach, in 2016 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), 15–17 Dec. 2016 2016, pp. 13–22, https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI.2016.0011.

Webster A, Poyade M, Rea P, Paul L. The Co-design of Hand Rehabilitation Exercises for Multiple Sclerosis Using Hand Tracking System, in Biomedical Visualisation: Volume 1, P. M. Rea Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 83–96.

Yeh SC, Lee SH, Chan RC, Chen S. A Kinect-Based System for Stroke Rehabilitation, in 2019 Twelfth International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing (Ubi-Media), 5–8 Aug. 2019 2019, pp. 192–198, https://doi.org/10.1109/Ubi-Media.2019.00045.

Ain QU et al. Additional Effects of Xbox Kinect Training on Upper Limb Function in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Control Trial, Healthcare, vol. 9, no. 3, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030242.

Almasi S, Shahmoradi L, Ansari NN, Honarpishe R. and A. h, Kinect-based Virtual Rehabilitation for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery in Chronic Stroke, in 2020 International Serious Games Symposium (ISGS), 23–25 Dec. 2020 2020, pp. 51–60, https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGS51981.2020.9375290.

Faity G, Mottet D, Froger J. Validity and Reliability of Kinect v2 for Quantifying Upper Body Kinematics during Seated Reaching, Sensors, vol. 22, no. 7, p. 2735, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/7/2735.

Lobo-Prat J, Kooren PN, Stienen AHA, Herder JL, Koopman BFJM, Veltink PH. Non-invasive control interfaces forintention detection in active movement-assistive devices, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 168, 2014/12/17 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-168.

Lenzi T, Rossi SMMD, Vitiello N, Carrozza MC. Intention-based EMG Control for Powered exoskeletons. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59(8):2180–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2012.2198821.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tamburella F et al. Influences of the biofeedback content on robotic post-stroke gait rehabilitation: electromyographic vs joint torque biofeedback, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 95, 2019/07/23 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0558-0.

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, vol. 90, no. 5, p. 498, 2019.

Mugler EM et al. Myoelectric Computer Interface Training for Reducing Co-Activation and Enhancing Arm Movement in Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Trial, (in eng), Neurorehabil Neural Repair, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 284–295, Apr 2019.

Kim J-H. The effects of training using EMG biofeedback on stroke patients upper extremity functions. J Phys Therapy Sci. 2017;29:1085–8. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.1085.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gámez AB, Hernandez Morante JJ, Martínez Gil JL, Esparza F, Martínez CM. The effect of surface electromyography biofeedback on the activity of extensor and dorsiflexor muscles in elderly adults: a randomized trial, Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 13153, 2019/09/11 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49720-x.

Cardoso VF et al. Towards an upper limb rehabilitation tool after stroke based on surface electromyography biofeedback and virtual reality. Res Biomedical Eng, 38, 3, pp. 1017–25, 2022/09/01 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-022-00218-y.

Batista T, Machado L, Valença A, Moraes R. FarMyo: a serious game for hand and wrist Rehabilitation using a low-cost Electromyography device. Int J Serious Games, 6, pp. 3–19, 06/24 2019, https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v6i2.290.

Shah SGS, Robinson I. Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23(1):131–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Power V, de Eyto A, Hartigan B, Ortiz J, O’Sullivan LW. Application of a User-Centered Design Approach to the Development of XoSoft – A Lower Body Soft Exoskeleton, in Wearable Robotics: Challenges and Trends, Cham, M. C. Carrozza, S. Micera, and J. L. Pons, Eds., 2019// 2019: Springer International Publishing, pp. 44–48.

Meyer JT, Schrade SO, Lambercy O, Gassert R. User-centered Design and Evaluation of Physical Interfaces for an Exoskeleton for Paraplegic Users, in 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 24–28 June 2019 2019, pp. 1159–1166, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779527.

Louie DR et al. Patients’ and therapists’ experience and perception of exoskeleton-based physiotherapy during subacute stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative analysis. Disabil Rehabil, 44, 24, pp. 7390–8, 2022/11/20 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1989503.

Proulx CE, Higgins J, Gagnon DH. Occupational therapists’ evaluation of the perceived usability and utility of wearable soft robotic exoskeleton gloves for hand function rehabilitation following a stroke. Disabil Rehabilitation: Assist Technol, 18, 6, pp. 953–62, 2023/08/18 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2021.1938710.

Shin J-H, Ryu H, Jang SH. A task-specific interactive game-based virtual reality rehabilitation system for patients with stroke: a usability test and two clinical experiments, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 32, 2014/03/06 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-32.

Moser N, O’Malley MK, Erwin A. Importance of Wrist Movement Direction in Performing Activities of Daily Living Efficiently, (in eng), Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, vol. 2020, pp. 3174–3177, Jul 2020, https://doi.org/10.1109/embc44109.2020.9175381.

Nadeem M, Loss JG, Li Z-M, Seitz WH. Ulnar Extension Coupling in Functional wrist Kinematics during Hand activities of Daily Living. J Hand Surg. 2022;47(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.03.026. 187.e1-187.e13, 2022/02/01/.

Mateo S, Revol P, Fourtassi M, Rossetti Y, Collet C, Rode G. Kinematic characteristics of tenodesis grasp in C6 quadriplegia, (in eng), Spinal Cord, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 144-9, Feb 2013, https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.101.

Su FC, Chou YL, Yang CS, Lin GT, An KN. Movement of finger joints induced by synergistic wrist motion, (in eng), Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 491-7, Jun 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.01.002.

Renner CI, Bungert-Kahl P, Hummelsheim H. Change of strength and rate of rise of tension relate to functional arm recovery after stroke, (in eng). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Sep 2009;90(9):1548–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.024.

Metzger J-C et al. Assessment-driven selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty in robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study with a hand rehabilitation robot, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 154, 2014/11/15 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-154.

Hocine N, Gouaïch A, Cerri SA, Mottet D, Froger J, Laffont I. Adaptation in serious games for upper-limb rehabilitation: an approach to improve training outcomes. User Model User-Adapt Interact, 25, 1, pp. 65–98, 2015/03/01 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-015-9154-6.

Pinto JF, Carvalho HR, Chambel GRR, Ramiro J, Goncalves A. Adaptive gameplay and difficulty adjustment in a gamified upper-limb rehabilitation, in 2018 IEEE 6th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), 16–18 May 2018 2018, pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1109/SeGAH.2018.8401363.

Xue Z et al. Combining muscle-computer interface guided training with bihemispheric tDCS improves upper limb function in chronic stroke patients, medRxiv, p. 2023.12.14.23299812, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.14.23299812.

Brooke J. SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval Ind. 1995;189:1130.

Google Scholar 

Lewis J, Sauro J. The Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale. 2009, pp. 94–103.

Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2008;24(6):574–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776.

Article  Google Scholar 

Guillén-Climent S, et al. A usability study in patients with stroke using MERLIN, a robotic system based on serious games for upper limb rehabilitation in the home setting. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00837-z. /02/23 2021.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud. 2009;4(3):114–23.

Google Scholar 

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting Linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 10/07 2015;67(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest Package: tests in Linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw, 82, 13, pp. 1–26, 12/06 2017, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.

Muth C, Bales KL, Hinde K, Maninger N, Mendoza SP, Ferrer E. Alternative models for small samples in Psychological Research: applying Linear mixed effects models and generalized estimating equations to repeated measures data. Educ Psychol Meas, 76, 1, pp. 64–87, 2016/02/01 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415580432.

Tukey JW. The problem of multiple comparisons. Multiple Comparisons, 1953.

Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: simple linear regression 3 - residual analysis, (in eng), Restor Dent Endod, vol. 44, no. 1, p. e11, Feb 2019, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e11.

Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance, (in eng). Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nijenhuis SM, et al. Feasibility study into self-administered training at home using an arm and hand device with motivational gaming environment in chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0080-y. /10/09 2015.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Radder B, et al. A wearable soft-robotic glove enables hand support in ADL and rehabilitation: a feasibility study on the assistive functionality. J Rehabilitation Assist Technol Eng. 2016;3:2055668316670553. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668316670553.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hijikata N et al. Item Difficulty of Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity in Persons With Chronic Stroke With Moderate-to-Severe Upper Limb Impairment, (in eng), Front Neurol, vol. 11, p. 577855, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.577855.

Coscia M et al. Neurotechnology-aided interventions for upper limb motor rehabilitation in severe chronic stroke, Brain, vol. 142, no. 8, pp. 2182–2197, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz181.