Aishwarya J, Arjunkumar R. Assessment of gingival thickness with regard to age, gender and location in the dental arch—a clinical study. Int J Pharm Clin Res. 2015;7(6):399–401.
Alhajj WA. Gingival phenotypes and their relation to age, gender and other risk factors. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01073-y.
Article MathSciNet PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Anand PS, Bansal A, Shenoi BR, Kamath KP, Kamath NP, Anil S. Width and thickness of the gingiva in periodontally healthy individuals in a central Indian population: a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(1):751–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04053-w.
Andlin-Sobocki A. Changes of facial gingival dimensions in children. A 2-year longitudinal study. J Clin Periodontol. 1993;20(3):212–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1993.tb00346.x
Bimstein E, Eidelman E. Morphological changes in the attached and keratinized gingiva and gingival sulcus in the mixed dentition period. A 5-year longitudinal study. J Clin Periodontol. 1988;15(3):175–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1988.tb01565.x
Bosnjak A, Jorgić-Srdjak K, Maricević T, Plancak D. The width of clinically-defined keratinized gingiva in the mixed dentition. ASDC J Dent Child. 2002;69(3):266–70
Casarotto RA, Adamowski JC, Fallopa F, Bacanelli F. Coupling agents in therapeutic ultrasound: acoustic and thermal behavior. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(1):162–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00293-4.
Chackartchi T, Gleis R, Sculean A, Nevins M. A novel surgical approach to modify the periodontal phenotype for the prevention of mucogingival complications related to orthodontic treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2021;41(6):811–817. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.5774
Cortellini P, Bissada NF. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S204–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.16-0671.
Dridi SM, Chacun D, Joseph C, Dursun E. Methodological proposal to assess gingival thickness in children. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2018;16(6):535–40. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.a41663.
Eger T, Müller HP, Heinecke A. Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23(9):839–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00621.x.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gandhi V, Singh P, Bakshi R, Singh R, Sood R, Brar AS. Analysis of age and gender-related changes in gingival width in patients of known population: a cross-sectional study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13(Suppl 1):S436–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_584_20.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ganti B, Bednarz W, Kőműves K, Vág J. Reproducibility of the PIROP ultrasonic biometer for gingival thickness measurements. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(3):263–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12446.
Gomes-Filho IS, Miranda DA, Trindade SC, de Souza Teles Santos CA, de Freitas CO, da Cruz SS, de Macêdo TC, de Santana Passos J. Relationship among gender, race, age, gingival width, and probing depth in primary teeth. J Periodontol. 2006;77(6):1032–42. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050198
Kao RT, Pasquinelli K. Thick vs. thin gingival tissue: a key determinant in tissue response to disease and restorative treatment. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2002;30(7):521–6.
Kim DM, Neiva R. Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015;86(2 Suppl):S56-72. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.130684.
Kim DM, Bassir SH, Nguyen TT. Effect of gingival phenotype on the maintenance of periodontal health: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol. 2020;91(3):311–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0337.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kloukos D, Koukos G, Doulis I, Sculean A, Stavropoulos A, Katsaros C. Gingival thickness assessment at the mandibular incisors with four methods: a cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2018;89(11):1300–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0125.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kolte R, Kolte A, Mahajan A. Assessment of gingival thickness with regards to age, gender and arch location. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014;18(4):478–81. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.138699.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kus-Bartoszek A, Lipski M, Safranow K, Drozdzik A. The attached gingiva thickness in the mandibular anterior region during the early transitional dentition phase. Quintessence Int. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a45606.
Kus-Bartoszek A, Lipski M, Jarząbek A, Manowiec J, Droździk A. Gingival phenotype changes and the prevalence of mucogingival deformities during the early transitional dentition phase—a 2-year longitudinal study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):3899. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073899.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee WZ, Ong MMA, Yeo AB. Gingival profiles in a select Asian cohort: a pilot study. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12269.
Mazeland GR. Longitudinal aspects of gingival width. J Periodontal Res. 1980;15(4):429–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1980.tb00300.x.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mehta P, Lim LP. The width of the attached gingiva–much ado about nothing? J Dent. 2010;38(7):517–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.04.007.
Merijohn GK, Chambrone L, Brodsky AI, Xenoudi P. Mandibular anterior lingual recession: keratinized tissue grafting and minimally invasive harvesting. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2021;11(4):201–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10132.
Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Yearbook medical; 1988.
Nik-Azis NM, Razali M, Goh V, Ahmad Shuhaimi NN, Mohd Nazrin NAS. Assessment of gingival thickness in multi-ethnic subjects with different gingival pigmentation levels. J Clin Periodontol. 2023;50(1):80–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13723.
Peixoto A, Marques TM, Correia A. Gingival biotype characterization-a study in a Portuguese sample. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015;10(4):534–46.
Savitha B, Vandana KL. Comparative assesment of gingival thickness using transgingival probing and ultrasonographic method. Indian J Dent Res. 2005;16(4):135–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.29908.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Saxena D, Mamen RA, Jain S, Pandav G, Aggarwal R, Jolly S. Clinical evaluation of gingival thickness and width according to dental arch and location in pigmented and nonpigmented gingiva. Dental J Adv Stud. 2021;9(01):31–5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1719225.
Tsiolis FI, Needleman IG, Griffiths GS. Periodontal ultrasonography. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(10):849–54. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00380.x. (PMID: 14710764).
Vandana KL, Shivani S, Savitha B, Vivek HP. Assessment of gingival sulcus depth, width of attached gingiva, and gingival thickness in primary, mixed, and permanent dentition. J Dent Res Rev. 2017;4:42–9.
Vlachodimou E, Fragkioudakis I, Vouros I. Is there an association between the gingival phenotype and the width of keratinized gingiva? A systematic review. Dent J (Basel). 2021;9(3):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9030034.
Wang J, Cha S, Zhao Q, Bai D. Methods to assess tooth gingival thickness and diagnose gingival phenotypes: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(4):620–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12900.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wyrębek B, Orzechowska A, Cudziło D, Plakwicz P. Evaluation of changes in the width of gingiva in children and youth. Review of literature. Dev Period Med. 2015;19(2):212–6.
Xie GY, Chen JH, Wang H, Wang YJ. Morphological measurement of biologic width in Chinese people. J Oral Sci. 2007;49(3):197–200. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.49.197.
Zweers J, Thomas RZ, Slot DE, Weisgold AS, Van der Weijden FG. Characteristics of periodontal biotype, its dimensions, associations and prevalence: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(10):958–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12275.
留言 (0)