Ahmed HMA. Nano-computed tomography: current and future perspectives. Restor Dent Endod. 2016;41(3):236–8. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.236.

Article  Google Scholar 

Azar MR, Safi L, Nikaein A. Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and Pro Taper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth. Dent Res J. 2012;9(2):146–51. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.95227.

Article  Google Scholar 

Barasuol JC, et al. Shaping ability of hand, rotary and reciprocating files in primary teeth: a micro-CT study in vitro. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(2):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00530-0.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000;22(1): 77–78. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10730297

Cuijpers VMJI, et al. Resolution, sensitivity, and in vivo application of high-resolution computed tomography for titanium-coated polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) dental implants. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2014;25(3):359–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12128.

Article  Google Scholar 

Curzon MEJ, Roberts JF, Kennedy DB. Kennedy’s paediatric operative dentistry. Wright Publishing Company; 1996. Available from: https://books.google.com/books/about/Kennedy_s_Paediatric_Operative_Dentistry.html?hl=&id=3fJpAAAAMAAJ

Elsherief SM, Zayet MK, Hamouda IM. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of curved root canals after mechanical preparation with three nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Biomed Res. 2013;27(4):326–35. https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.27.20130008.

Article  Google Scholar 

Esentürk G, et al. A micro-computed tomographic assessment of root canal preparation with conventional and different rotary files in primary teeth and young permanent teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020;30(2):202–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12587.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gadallah L, et al. Pulpotomy versus pulpectomy in the treatment of vital pulp exposure in primary incisors. A systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Research. 2018;7:1560. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16142.3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Govindaraju L, et al. Assessment of quality of obturation, instrumentation time and intensity of pain with pediatric rotary file (Kedo-S) in primary anterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;11(6):462–7. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1558.

Article  Google Scholar 

Haridoss S, Rakkesh KM, Swaminathan K. Transportation and centering ability of Kedo-S pediatric and Mtwo instruments in primary teeth: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(Suppl 1):S30–4. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2127.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Top. 2005;10(1):30–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L. Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018;19(4):273–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-018-0356-6.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Jeevanandan G, Thomas E. Volumetric analysis of hand, reciprocating and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars using spiral computed tomography: an comparative study. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(1):21–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_247_17.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kalita S, et al. Comparative evaluation of cleaning capacity and efficiency of Kedo-S pediatric rotary files, rotary ProTaper, and hand K files in primary molar pulpectomy. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(3):383–7. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1958.

Article  Google Scholar 

Katge F, et al. Comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning efficacy of manual instrumentation, rotary systems and reciprocating systems in primary teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32(4):311–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.140957.

Article  Google Scholar 

Madan N, et al. K-file vs ProFiles in cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in primary molar root canals: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011;29(1):2–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.79907.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Martin AG, et al. Posts in primary teeth-past to present: a review of literature. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(5):705–10. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2034.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mehlawat R, et al. Comparative evaluation of instrumentation timing and cleaning efficacy in extracted primary molars using manual and NiTi rotary technique—invitro study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019;9(2):151–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.03.003.

Article  Google Scholar 

Metzger Z, et al. The quality of root canal preparation and root canal obturation in canals treated with rotary versus self-adjusting files: a three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1569–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.003.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mohamed RH, Abdelrahman AM, Sharaf AA. Evaluation of rotary file system (Kedo-S-Square) in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02021-0.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Moraes RDR, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of root canal preparation with rotary instrumentation on prototyped primary incisors. Braz Oral Res. 2021;35: e132. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0132.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nouri H, Amini K, Jahromi MZ. Comparison of full rotation and reciprocating movements in regaining apical patency during endodontic retreatment. Dent Res J 2021;18:85. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760076

Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Comparison of post-operative pain after root canal instrumentation with hand K-files, H-files and rotary Kedo-S files in primary teeth: a randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(5):467–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00429-5.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Pawar BA, et al. Apical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: an ex vivo study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):3859. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83522-4.

Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Poornima P, et al. “Volumetric analysis of hand and rotary root canal instrumentation and filling in primary teeth using Spiral Computed Tomography”—an invitro study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26(3):193–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12180.

Article  Google Scholar 

Prabhakar AR, et al. Reciprocating vs rotary instrumentation in pediatric endodontics: cone beam computed tomographic analysis of deciduous root canals using two single-file systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(1):45–9. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1332.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rajain T, Tsomu K, Namdev R. Evaluation and comparison of effectiveness of Kedo-S pediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal treatment in primary molars. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023;16(1):22–9. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2511.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rathi N, et al. Comparative evaluation of cleaning efficiency and apical extrusion of debris using two pediatric rotary endodontic files: an study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(2):196–200. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1918.

Article  Google Scholar 

Saleh AR, Rashid A. Shaping ability of different endodontic single-file systems using simulated resin blocks. Indian J Multidiscip Dent. 2016;6(2):61. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-6360.197745.

Article  Google Scholar 

Saleh AM, et al. Shaping ability of 4 different single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod. 2015;41(4):548–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.019.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sandhu SV, et al. Sterilization of extracted human teeth: a comparative analysis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2012;2:170–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2012.09.002.

Article  Google Scholar 

Seema T, et al. Comparative evaluation of dentin removal and taper of root canal preparation of hand K file, ProTaper rotary file, and Kedo S rotary file in primary molars using cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13(4):332–6. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787.

Article  Google Scholar 

Selvakumar H, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of K3 rotary and stainless steel K file instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(1):ZC05-8. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/14183.7028.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Suresh B, et al. Comparative evaluation of extrusion of apical debris in primary maxillary anterior teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files: an in vitro study. Children. 2023;10(5):898. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10050898.

Article  Google Scholar 

Swaminathan K, Rakkesh KM, Haridoss S. Computed tomographic assessment of remaining dentin and risk of perforation after Kedo-S and Mtwo rotary instrumentation in root canals of primary teeth: an study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(Suppl 1):S87–91. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2217.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tomson PL, Simon SR. Contemporary cleaning and shaping of the root canal system. Prim Dent J. 2016;5(2):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1308/205016816819304196.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhao D, et al. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2014;40(11):1860–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.023.

Article  Google Scholar