Arias A, Lee YH, Peters CI, Gluskin AH, et al. Comparison of 2 canal preparation techniques in the induction of microcracks: a pilot study with cadaver mandibles. J Endod. 2014;40(7):982–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.003.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel–titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(1):77–8 (PMID:10633522).

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bhagyashree B, Rao D, Panwar S, Kothari N, et al. An in vitro comparative evaluation of dentinal crack formation caused by three different nickel–titanium rotary file systems in primary anterior teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2022;40(2):188–94. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_100_22.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bier CA, Shemesh H, Tanomaru-Filho M, Wesselink PR, et al. The ability of different nickel–titanium rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation. J Endod. 2009;35(2):236–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.021.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cassimiro M, Romeiro K, Gominho L, de Almeida A, et al. Effects of reciproc, protaper next and waveone gold on root canal walls: a stereomicroscope analysis. Iran Endod J. 2018;13(2):228–33. https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v13i2.16327.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cheema J, Gupta AK, Minocha A. Comparison of dentinal cracks after root canal preparation with hand files and protaper NEXT, HYFLEX EDM, K3 XF and twisted rotary files. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res. 2018;6(5):30–5. https://doi.org/10.21276/jamdsr.

Article  Google Scholar 

Çiçek E, Koçak MM, Sağlam BC, Koçak S. Evaluation of microcrack formation in root canals after instrumentation with different NiTi rotary file systems: a scanning electron microscopy study. Scanning. 2015;37(1):49–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21178.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Curzon MEJ, Roberts JF, Kennedy DB. Kennedy’s paediatric operative dentistry. 4th ed. Wright; 1996.

De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Marins J, Souza E, et al. Lack of causal relationship between dentinal microcracks and root canal preparation with reciprocation systems. J Endod. 2014;40(9):1447–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.019.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Duggal M, Gizani S, Albadri S, Krämer N, et al. Best clinical practice guidance for treating deep carious lesions in primary teeth: an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022;23(5):659–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00718-6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fumes AC, Sousa-Neto MD, Leoni GB, Versiani MA, et al. Root canal morphology of primary molars: a micro-computed tomography study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(5):317–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-014-0117-0.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harokopakis-Hajishengallis E. Physiological root resorption in primary teeth: molecular and histological events. J Oral Sci. 2007;49(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.49.1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hidalgo LR, Silva LA, Leoni GB, Mazzi-Chaves JF, et al. Mechanical preparation showed superior shaping ability than manual technique in primary molars-a micro-computed tomography study. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(4):453–60. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201601552.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jalali S, Eftekhar B, Paymanpour P, Yazdizadeh M, et al. Effects of Reciproc, Mtwo and ProTaper instruments on formation of root fracture. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(4):252–5. https://doi.org/10.7508/iej.2015.04.009.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kumari MR, Krishnaswamy MM. Comparative analysis of crack propagation in roots with hand and rotary instrumentation of the root canal-an ex-vivo study. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR. 2016;10(7):ZC16-19. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/17576.8122.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lam PP, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Fracture strength of tooth roots following canal preparation by hand and rotary instrumentation. J Endod. 2005;31(7):529–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000150947.90682.a0.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu R, Hou BX, Wesselink PR, Wu MK, et al. The incidence of root micro cracks caused by 3 different single file systems versus the ProTaper system. J Endod. 2013a;39(8):1054–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.013.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu R, Kaiwar A, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR, et al. Incidence of apical root cracks and apical dentinal detachments after canal preparation with hand and rotary files at different instrumentation lengths. J Endod. 2013b;39(1):129–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.019.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mahmoud D, Khattab N, ELheeny A. Effect of different nickel-titanium rotary systems on dentinal crack formation during root canal preparation in primary molars: an in vitro study. Egypt Dent J. 2022;68(3):2067–74. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2022.132220.2065.

Article  Google Scholar 

Milani AS, Froughreyhani M, Rahimi S, Jafarabadi MA, et al. The effect of root canal preparation on the development of dentin cracks. Iran Endod J. 2012;7(4):177–82.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mohamed R, Majid S, Faiza A. Root microcracks formation during root canal instrumentation using reciprocating and rotary files. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(3):259–63. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3055.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nagaratna PJ, Shashikiran ND, Subbareddy VV. In vitro comparison of NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel hand instruments in root canal preparations of primary and permanent molar. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006;24(4):186–91. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.28075.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Özyürek T, Uslu G, Yılmaz K. Effect of different nickel–titanium rotary files on dentinal crack formation during root canal preparation in primary molars: a laboratory study. Turk Endod J (TEJ). 2017;2(2):38–42. https://doi.org/10.14744/TEJ.2017.57966.

Article  Google Scholar 

Panda A, Shah K, Budakoti V, Dere K, et al. Evaluation of microcrack formation during root canal preparation using hand, rotary files and self-adjusting file in primary teeth: an in vitro study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021;15(1):35–41. https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.007.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Parimala K, Singh TN, Shilpi T, Barkha C. Literature review on rotary endodontics in primary teeth. SRM J Res Dent Scie. 2021;12(2):95–100. https://doi.org/10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_132_20.

Article  Google Scholar 

Parisay I, Ghoddusi J, Forghani M. A review on vital pulp therapy in primary teeth. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(1):6–15.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rahman H, Chandra A, Singh S. In vitro evaluation of dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi systems. IJRD. 2014;3(2):43–7.

Google Scholar 

Ricucci D, Langeland K. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study. Int Endod J. 1998;31(6):394–409. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00183.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ruddle CJ, Machtou P, West JD. The shaping movement: fifth generation technology. Dent Today. 2013;32:6–9.

Google Scholar 

Shemesh H, Bier CA, Wu MK, Tanomaru-Filho M, et al. The effects of canal preparation and filling on the incidence of dentinal defects. Int Endod J. 2009;42(3):208–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01502.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Silva LA, Leonardo MR, Nelson-Filho P, Tanomaru JM. Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars. J Dent Child. 2004;71(1):45–7.

Google Scholar 

Sim TP, Knowles JC, Ng YL, Shelton J, et al. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on mechanical properties of dentine and tooth surface strain. Int Endod J. 2001;34(2):120–32. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00357.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ustun Y, Aslan T, Sagsen B, Kesim B. The effects of different nickel–titanium instruments on dentinal microcrack formations during root canal preparation. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(01):041–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.149638.

Article  Google Scholar 

Versluis A, Messer HH, Pintado MR. Changes in compaction stress distributions in roots resulting from canal preparation. Int Endod J. 2006;39(12):931–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01164.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Waterhouse PJ, Whitworth JM, Camp JH, Fuks AB. Pediatric endodontics: endodontic treatment for the primary and young permanent dentition. In: Berman LH, Hargreaves KM, editors. Cohen’s pathways of the pulp. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. p. 808–57.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Wright HM, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, et al. Identification of resected root-end dentinal cracks: a comparative study of transillumination and dyes. J Endod. 2004;30(10):712–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000125876.26495.20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yüksel BN, Öncü A, Çelİkten B, Bİlecenoğlu B, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of “danger zone” and microcrack formation in mesial root canals of primary teeth with single-file rotary and reciprocating systems. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022;32(1):109–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12800.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar