Gramiak R, Shah PM. Echocardiography of the aortic root. Invest Radio. 1968;3:356–66.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Porter TR, Abdelmoneim S, Belcik JT, McCulloch ML, Mulvagh SL, Olson JJ, et al. Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: a focused update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27:797–810.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang S, et al. Targeting of microbubbles: contrast agents for ultrasound molecular imaging. J Drug Target. 2018;26(5–6):420–34.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zullino S, et al. From micro- to nano-multifunctional theranostic platform: effective ultrasound imaging is not just a matter of scale. Mol Imaging. 2018;17:1536012118778216.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

de Jong N, et al. Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009;47(8):861–73.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Omata D, et al. Lipid-based microbubbles and ultrasound for therapeutic application. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2020;154–155:236–44.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chitnis PV, Koppolu S, Mamou J, et al. Influence of shell properties on high-frequency ultrasound imaging and drug delivery using polymer-shelled microbubbles. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2013; 60.

Chitnis PV, Lee P, Mamou J, et al. Rupture threshold characterization of polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents subjected to static overpressure. J Appl Phys. 2011;109:84906–8490610.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sirsi S, Borden M. Microbubble compositions, properties and biomedical applications. Bubble Sci Eng Technol. 2009;1(1–2):3–17.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Feinstein SB, et al. Safety and efficacy of a new transpulmonary ultrasound contrast agent: initial multicenter clinical results. J Am College Cardiologyvol. 1990;16(2):316–24.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Mulvagh SL, et al. American Society of Echocardiography consensus statement on the clinical applications of ultrasonic contrast agents in echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21(11):1179–201 quiz 1281.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Porter TR, Mulvagh SL, Abdelmoneim SS, Becher H, Belcik JT, Bierig M, et al. Clinical applications of ultrasonic enhancing agents in echocardiography: 2018 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines update. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31:241–74.This paper updates the 2008 guidelines and replaces the term microbubbles with ultrasound enhancing agents. The paper also updates the new clinical evidence showing that UEAs are safe and efficacious for LV opacification in various clinical scenarios.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Fraiche A, Strom J. Impact of ultrasound enhancing agents on clinical management. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2022;37(5):389–93.This paper updates the evidence that UEAs are cost effective in reducing downstream costs by improving endocardial border delineation. Improving workflows through enhanced reader confidence and study accuracy makes UEAs an asset in the echo lab despite its current laggard use.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Ellenberger, Katherine et al. “The effect of obesity on echocardiographic image quality.” Heart Lung Circ 2022; 31(2): 207–215.This paper demonstrates that increasing BMI, a surrogate for obesity, necessitates increasing UEA use to reduce nondiagnostic studies.

Kooiman K, et al. Ultrasound-responsive cavitation nuclei for therapy and drug delivery. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020;46(6):1296–325.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang M, et al. Sonoporation-induced cell membrane permeabilization and cytoskeleton disassembly at varied acoustic and microbubble-cell parameters. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3885.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hu Y, et al. Membrane perforation and recovery dynamics in microbubble-mediated sonoporation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(12):2393–405.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Man VH, et al. Molecular mechanism of the cell membrane pore formation induced by bubble stable cavitation. J Phys Chem B. 2019;123(1):71–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yong Y, Wu D, Fernandes V, Kopelen HA, Shimoni S, Nagueh SF, Callahan JD, Bruns DE, Shaw LJ, Quinones MA, Zoghbi WA. Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of contrast echocardiography on evaluation of cardiac function in technically very difficult patients in the intensive care unit. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89(6):711–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hughes RK, et al. Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the variant less known. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(5):e015294.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Nagueh, Sherif F et al. “Recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography, in Collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.” J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2022; 35(6): 533–569. This paper provides the latest ASE guidelines on how to image in HCM patients and excellent examples of multimodality imaging incorporating UEAs.

Urbano-Moral JA, et al. Contrast-enhanced echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular wall thickness in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison with standard echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33(9):1106–15.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Phelan D, et al. Comparison of ventricular septal measurements in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients who underwent surgical myectomy using multimodality imaging and implications for diagnosis and management. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(10):1656–62.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lang RM, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Euro Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(3):233–70.

Article  Google Scholar 

Aggarwal S, et al. Masking and unmasking of isolated noncompaction of the left ventricle with real-time contrast echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(11):e006999.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gin KG, et al. Femoral vein delivery of contrast medium enhances transthoracic echocardiographic detection of patent foramen ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(7):1994–2000.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goyal SK, Punnam SR, Verma G, Ruberg FL. Persistent left superior vena cava: a case report and review of literature. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008;10(6):50.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bagur R, et al. A novel application of contrast echocardiography to exclude active coronary perforation bleeding in patients with pericardial effusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv: official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2013;82(2):221–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Weinsaft JW, et al. Echocardiographic algorithm for post-myocardial infarction LV thrombus: a gatekeeper for thrombus evaluation by delayed enhancement CMR. JACC Cardiovasc imaging. 2016;9(5):505–15.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Camaj A, et al. Left ventricular thrombus following acute myocardial infarction: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am College Cardiol. 2022;79(10):1010–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.011.

Article  Google Scholar 

Janardhanan R, et al. Usefulness of myocardial contrast echocardiography using low-power continuous imaging early after acute myocardial infarction to predict late functional left ventricular recovery. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92(5):493–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kurt M, et al. Impact of contrast echocardiography on evaluation of ventricular function and clinical management in a large prospective cohort. J Am College Cardiol. 2009;53(9):802–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Senior R, et al. Clinical practice of contrast echocardiography: recommendation by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) 2017. Euro Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(11):1205–1205af.

Article  Google Scholar 

Plana JC, Mikati IA, Dokainish H, et al. A randomized cross-over study for evaluation of the effect of image optimization with contrast on the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine echocardiography in coronary artery disease: the OPTIMIZE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2008;1:145.

Article  Google Scholar 

Woodward W, et al. Real-world performance and accuracy of stress echocardiography: the EVAREST observational multi-centre study. Euro Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;23(5):689–98.

Article  Google Scholar 

Becher H, von Bibra H. “Verstärkung von Doppler-Signalen bei Aorten- und Mitralvitien” [Enhancement of Doppler signals in aortic and mitral valve diseases]. Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie. 1997;86(12):1033–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Smith LA, et al. Contrast agent increases Doppler velocities and improves reproducibility of aortic valve area measurements in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17(3):247–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dwivedi G, Hickman M, Senior R. Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis with intravenous contrast. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006;7(2):165–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Byrd BF 3rd, et al. Contrast echocardiography enhances tricuspid but not mitral regurgitation. Clin Cardiol. 1991;14(11 Suppl 5):V10–4.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sorrell, Vincent, Kumar, Sachin. "Doppler contrast echocardiography". Establishing better standards of care in doppler echocardiography, computed tomography and nuclear cardiology, edited by Richard Fleming, IntechOpen 2011; https://doi.org/10.5772/25152.

Wei K, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation. 1998;97(5):473–83.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abdelmoneim SS, et al. Microvascular function in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy with contrast echocardiography: prospective evaluation and review of literature. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(11):1249–55.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lashin H, et al. Contrast-enhanced echocardiography application in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): a narrative review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36(7):2080–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pereira JB, et al. The feasibility of contrast echocardiography in the assessment of right ventricular size and function. Echocardiography. 2019;36(11):1979–88.