Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kyriazis I, Spinos T, Tsaturyan A, et al. Different nerve-sparing techniques during radical prostatectomy and their impact on functional outcomes. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(7):1601.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nguyen LN, Head L, Witiuk K, et al. The risks and benefits of cavernous neurovascular bundle sparing during radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2017;198(4):760–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):405–17.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):418–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reeves F, Preece P, Kapoor J, et al. Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is associated with improved time to continence after radical prostatectomy but not long-term continence rates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;68(4):692–704.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bejrananda T, Takahara K, Sowanthip D, et al. Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):15835.

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Heesakkers J, Farag F, Bauer RM, et al. Pathophysiology and contributing factors in postprostatectomy incontinence: a review. Eur Urol. 2017;71(6):936–44.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Morozov A, Barret E, Veneziano D, et al. A systematic review of nerve-sparing surgery for high-risk prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(3):283–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Albayrak S, Canguven O, Goktas C, et al. Radical perineal prostatectomy and early continence: outcomes after 120 cases. Int Braz J Urol. 2010;36(6):693–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Asimakopoulos AD, Topazio L, De Angelis M, et al. Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(7):2187–96.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Avulova S, Zhao Z, Lee D, et al. The effect of nerve sparing status on sexual and urinary function: 3-Year results from the CEASAR study. J Urol. 2018;199(5):1202–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berg KD, Thomsen FB, Hvarness H, et al. Early biochemical recurrence, urinary continence and potency outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol. 2014;48(4):356–66.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berry T, Tepera C, Staneck D, et al. Is there correlation of nerve-sparing status and return to baseline urinary function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? J Endourol. 2009;23(3):489–93.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bhat KRS, Onol FF, Moschovas MC, et al. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in young adults: age-stratified oncological and functional outcomes. J Robot Surg. 2022;16(5):1057–66.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Budaus L, Isbarn H, Schlomm T, et al. Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2009;56(2):317–24.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Fleischmann A, et al. Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy–does it have an impact on urinary continence? J Urol. 2006;176(1):189–95.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Choi WW, Freire MP, Soukup JR, et al. Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2011;29(1):21–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Collette ERP, Klaver SO, Lissenberg-Witte BI, et al. Patient reported outcome measures concerning urinary incontinence after robot assisted radical prostatectomy: development and validation of an online prediction model using clinical parameters, lower urinary tract symptoms and surgical experience. J Robot Surg. 2021;15(4):593–602.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

D’altilia N, Mancini V, Falagario UG, et al. A matched-pair analysis after robotic and retropubic radical prostatectomy: a new definition of continence and the impact of different surgical techniques. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(18):4350.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dalkin BL, Christopher BA, Shawler D. Health related quality of life outcomes after radical prostatectomy: attention to study design and the patient-based importance of single-surgeon studies. Urol Oncol. 2006;24(1):28–32.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

El-Hakim A, Al-Hathal N, Al-Qaoud T, et al. Novel uroflow stop test at time of catheter removal is a strong predictor of early urinary continence recovery following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(1):60–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feng T, Heulitt G, Lee JJ, et al. Randomised comparison of techniques for control of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2020;126(5):586–94.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fossati N, Di Trapani E, Gandaglia G, et al. Assessing the impact of Surgeon experience on urinary continence recovery after Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results of four high-volume Surgeons. J Endourol. 2017;31(9):872–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Geraerts I, Van Poppel H, Devoogdt N, et al. Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2013;112(7):936–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hatiboglu G, Teber D, Tichy D, et al. Predictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2016;34(1):113–20.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hinata N, Murakami G, Miyake H, et al. Urethral sphincter fatigue after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: descriptive questionnaire-based study and anatomic basis. Urology. 2014;84(1):144–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Holze S, Mende M, Healy KV, et al. Comparison of various continence definitions in a large group of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a multicentre, prospective study. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):70.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kim M, Park M, Pak S, et al. Integrity of the urethral sphincter complex, nerve-sparing, and long-term continence status after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(5):823–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ko YH, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, et al. Factors affecting return of continence 3 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis from a large, prospective data by a single surgeon. J Urol. 2012;187(1):190–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kohjimoto Y, Higuchi M, Yamashita S, et al. Bladder neck size and its association with urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJUI Compass. 2023;4(2):181–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kovacik V, Maciak M, Balaz V, et al. Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: first independent evaluation and review of other factors influencing 1 year continence outcomes. World J Urol. 2020;38(8):1933–41.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kowalczyk KJ, Huang AC, Hevelone ND, et al. Effect of minimizing tension during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on urinary function recovery. World J Urol. 2013;31(3):515–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kung TA, Waljee JF, Curtin CM, et al. Interpositional nerve grafting of the prostatic plexus after radical prostatectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(7):e452.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lavigueur-Blouin H, Noriega AC, Valdivieso R, et al. Predictors of early continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(1–2):e93-7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee DJ, Cheetham P, Badani KK. Predictors of early urinary continence after robotic prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2010;17(3):5200–5.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marien TP, Lepor H. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy? BJU Int. 2008;102(11):1581–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nandipati KC, Raina R, Agarwal A, et al. Nerve-sparing surgery significantly affects long-term continence after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2007;70(6):1127–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Novara G, Ficarra V, D’elia C, et al. Evaluating urinary continence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1028–33.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nyarangi-Dix JN, Tosev G, Damgov I, et al. Recovery of pad-free continence in elderly men does not differ from younger men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for aggressive prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2020;38(2):351–60.