Allan DM (1973) Some relationships of vocalization to behavior in the Pacific treefrog, Hyla regilla. Herpetologica 29:366–371

Google Scholar 

Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Book  Google Scholar 

Baird AF, Girard C (1852) Description of new species of reptiles, collected by the US exploring expedition under the command of Capt. Charles Wilkes, USN Part 1. Proc Acad Nat Sci Phila 6:174–177

Google Scholar 

Banker SE, Lemmon AR, Hassinger AB, Dye M, Holland SD, Kortyna ML, Ospina OE, Ralicki H, Lemmon EM (2020) Hierarchical hybrid enrichment: multitiered genomic data collection across evolutionary scales, with application to chorus frogs (Pseudacris). Syst Biol 69:756–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz074

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barrow LN, Ralicki HF, Emme SA, Lemmon EM (2014) Species tree estimation of North American chorus frogs (Hylidae: Pseudacris) with parallel tagged amplicon sequencing. Mol Phylogenet Evol 75:78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.02.007

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bass AH, Ladich F (2008) Vocal–acoustic communication: From neurons to behavior. In: Webb JF, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Fish bioacoustics. Springer, New York, pp 253–278

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Article  Google Scholar 

Beatini JR, Proudfoot GA, Gall MD (2018) Frequency sensitivity in Northern saw-whet owls (Aegolius acadicus). J Comp Physiol A 204:145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-017-1216-2

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

Google Scholar 

Brenowitz EA (1989) Neighbor call amplitude influences aggressive behavior and intermale spacing in choruses of the Pacific treefrog (Hyla regilla). Ethology 83:69–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1989.tb00520.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Brenowitz EA, Rose GJ (1999) Female choice and plasticity of male calling behaviour in the Pacific treefrog. Anim Behav 57:1337–1342. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1111

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brittan-Powell EF, Dooling RJ, Gleich O (2002) Auditory brainstem responses in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). J Acoust Soc Am 112:999–1008. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1494807

Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brittan-Powell EF, Lohr B, Hahn DC, Dooling RJ (2005) Auditory brainstem responses in the Eastern screech owl: an estimate of auditory thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 118:314–321. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1928767

Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brittan-Powell EF, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Tang Y, Carr C, Dooling RJ (2010) The auditory brainstem response in two lizard species. J Acoust Soc Am 128:787–794. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3458813

Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Buerkle NP, Schrode KM, Bee MA (2014) Assessing stimulus and subject influences on auditory evoked potentials and their relation to peripheral physiology in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 178:68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.08.005

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Capranica RR, Moffat AJM (1983) Neurobehavioral correlates of sound communication in anurans. In: Ewert J-P, Capranica RR, Ingle DJ (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. Springer, Boston, pp 701–730

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Chen J, Jono T, Cui J, Yue X, Tang Y (2016) The acoustic properties of low intensity vocalizations match hearing sensitivity in the webbed-toed gecko Gekko Subpalmatus. PLoS ONE 11:e0146677. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146677

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cotton S, Rogers DW, Small J, Pomiankowski A, Fowler K (2006) Variation in preference for a male ornament is positively associated with female eyespan in the stalk-eyed fly Diasemopsis meigenii. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:1287–1292. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3449

Article  Google Scholar 

Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London

Book  Google Scholar 

Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London

Book  Google Scholar 

Delaney HD, Maxwell SE (1981) On using analysis of covariance in repeated measures designs. Multivar Behav Res 16:105–123. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1601_6

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Duellman WE, Marion AB, Hedges SB (2016) Phylogenetics, classification, and biogeography of the treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae). Zootaxa 4104:1. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4104.1.1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139:S125–S153. https://doi.org/10.1086/285308

Article  Google Scholar 

Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Google Scholar 

Gerhardt HC, Schwartz JJ (2001) Auditory tuning and frequency preferences in anurans. In: Ryan MJ (ed) Anuran communication. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington (DC), pp 73–85

Google Scholar 

Gerhardt HC, Martínez-Rivera CC, Schwartz JJ, Marshall VT, Murphy CG (2007) Preferences based on spectral differences in acoustic signals in four species of treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae). J Exp Biol 210:2990–2998. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.006312

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gorga MP, Beauchaine KA, Reiland JK, Worthington DW, Javel E (1984) The effects of stimulus duration on ABR and behavioral thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 76:616–619. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391158

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gorga MP, Kaminski JR, Beauchaine KA, Jesteadt W (1988) Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects. J Speech Lang Hear Res 31:87–97. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3101.87

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Goutte S, Mason MJ, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Montealegre-Z F, Chivers BD, Sarria-S FA, Antoniazzi MM, Jared C, Almeida Sato L, Felipe Toledo L (2017) Evidence of auditory insensitivity to vocalization frequencies in two frogs. Sci Rep 7:12121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12145-5

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Green DM, Scolman T, Guthrie OW, Pasch B (2019) A broad filter between call frequency and peripheral auditory sensitivity in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster). J Comp Physiol A 205:481–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-019-01338-0

Article  Google Scholar 

Gupta S, Bee MA (2023) Female preferences for the spectral content of advertisement calls in Cope’s gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis). J Comp Physiol A 209:31–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-022-01575-w

Article  Google Scholar 

Hall JW (2007) New handbook of auditory evoked responses. Pearson, Boston

Google Scholar 

Henry KS, Gall MD, Vélez A, Lucas JR (2016) Avian auditory processing at four different scales: variation among species, seasons, sexes, and individuals. In: Bee MA, Miller CT (eds) Psychological mechanisms in animal communication. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 17–55

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Hillery CM (1984) Seasonality of two midbrain auditory responses in the treefrog. Hyla Chrysoscelis Copeia 1984:844. https://doi.org/10.2307/1445327

Article  Google Scholar 

Hoke KL, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Womack MC (2022) Peripheral auditory system divergence does not explain species differences in call preference. Brain Behav Evol 97:151–166. https://doi.org/10.1159/000522549

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jadin RC, Orlofske SA, Jezkova T, Blair C (2021) Single-locus species delimitation and ecological niche modelling provide insights into the evolution, historical distribution and taxonomy of the Pacific chorus frogs. Biol J Linn Soc 132:612–633. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blaa209

Article  Google Scholar 

Janik VM (2009) Acoustic communication in delphinids. Adv Stud Behav 40:123–157

Article  Google Scholar 

Keddy-Hector AC, Wilczynski W, Ryan MJ (1992) Call patterns and basilar papilla tuning in cricket frogs. II. Intrapopulation variation and allometry. Brain Behav Evol 39:238–246

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kostarakos K, Hartbauer M, Römer H (2008) Matched filters, mate choice and the evolution of sexually selected traits. PLoS ONE 3:e3005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003005

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) (1996) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

Google Scholar 

Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

Article  Google Scholar 

Labra A, Reyes-Olivares C, Moreno-Gómez FN, Velásquez NA, Penna M, Delano PH, Narins PM (2021) Geographic variation in the matching between call characteristics and tympanic sensitivity in the weeping lizard. Ecol Evol 11:18633–18650. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8469

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lenth R (2023) emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.8.8

Lewis ER, Narins PM (1999) The acoustic periphery of amphibians: anatomy and physiology. In: Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Comparative hearing: fish and amphibians. Springer, New York, pp 101–154

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Maruska KP, Boyle KS, Dewan LR, Tricas TC (2007) Sound p