Anderson, D. (2015). The nature and influence of teacher beliefs and knowledge on the science teaching practice of three generalist New Zealand primary teachers. Research in Science Education, 45, 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9428-8
Bencze, L., Pouliot, C., Pedretti, E., Simonneaux, L., Simonneaux, J., & Zeidler, D. (2020). SAQ, SSI and STSE education: Defending and extending “science-in-context.” Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(3), 825–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09962-7
*Borgerding, L. A., & Dagistan, M. (2018). Preservice science teachers’ concerns and approaches for teaching socioscientific and controversial issues. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(4), 283-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1440860
Bossér, U., Lundin, M., Lindahl, M., & Linder, C. (2015). Challenges Faced by Teachers Implementing Socio-Scientific Issues as Core Elements in Their Classroom Practices. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 159-176.
*Bryce, T., & Gray, D. (2004). Tough acts to follow: The challenges to science teachers presented by biotechnological progress. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 717-733. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000138833
Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377
Cotton, D. R. E. (2006). Teaching controversial environmental issues: Neutrality and balance in the reality of the classroom. Educational Research, 48(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880600732306
*Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1996). Science teachers’ social conscience and the role of controversial issues in the teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199603)33:3%3c319::AID-TEA5%3e3.0.CO;2-W
De-Shalit, A. (2005). Teaching political philosophy and academic neutrality. Theory and Research in Education, 3(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878505049837
Ekborg, M., Ottander, C., Silfver, E., & Simon, S. (2013). Teachers’ Experience of Working with Socio-scientific Issues: A Large Scale and in Depth Study. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 599-617.
*Eryasar, A. S., & Kilinc, A. (2021). The coherence between epistemologies and SSI teaching. Science & Education, 31, 123-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00200-7
*Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2008). Exploring preservice elementary teachers’ critique and adaptation of science curriculum materials in respect to socioscientific issues. Science & Education, 17(8), 829–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9080-z
*Griffith, J. A., & Brem, S. K. (2004). Teaching evolutionary biology: Pressures, stress, and coping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 791–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20027
*Hermann, R. S. (2013). High school biology teachers’ views on teaching evolution: implications for science teacher educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(4), 597-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9328-6
Hodson, D. (2020). Going beyond STS education: Building a curriculum for sociopolitical activism. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(4), 592–622.
Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (2004). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New York, NY: Routledge.
Journell, W. (2013). Learning from each other: What social studies can learn from the controversy surrounding the teaching of evolution in science. The Curriculum Journal, 24(4), 494-510. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.801780
Journell, W. (2016). Teacher political disclosure as parrhesia. College Record, 118 (5), 1-36.
Journell, W. (2011). The disclosure dilemma in action: A qualitative look at the effect of teacher disclosure on classroom instruction. Journal of Social Studies Research, 35(2), 217-244.
Kelly, T. E. (1986). Discussing controversial issues: Four perspectives on the teacher's role. Theory and Research in Social Education, 14(2), 113-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1986.10505516
Kello, K. (2016). Sensitive and controversial issues in the classroom: Teaching history in a divided society. Teachers and Teaching, 22(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1023027
*Kilinc, A., Demiral, U., & Kartal, T. (2017). Resistance to dialogic discourse in SSI teaching: The effects of an argumentation-based workshop, teaching practicum, and induction on a preservice science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 764-789. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21385
*Kilinc, A., Kelly, T., Eroglu, B., Demiral, U., Kartal, T., Sonmez, A., & Demirbag, M. (2017). Stickers to facts, imposers, democracy advocators, and committed impartialists: Preservice science teachers’ beliefs about teacher’s roles in socioscientific discourses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(2), 195-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9682-x
*Lee, H., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Choi, K. (2006). Korean science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socio-scientific issues into the science curriculum. Canadian Journal of Math, Science & Technology Education, 6(2), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556691
Mansour, N. (2013). Consistencies and inconsistencies between science teachers’ beliefs and practices. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1230-1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.743196
*Nation, M. T., & Feldman, A. (2021). Environmental education in the secondary science classroom: how teachers’ beliefs influence their instruction of climate change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(5), 481-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1854968
*Oliveira, A. W., Cook, K., & Buck, G. A. (2011). Framing evolution discussion intellectually. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20396
*Oulton, C., Day, V., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Controversial issues teachers’ attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 489-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000303973
*Ozden, M. (2015). Prospective elementary school teachers' views about socioscientific issues. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(3), 333–354.
Pace, J. (2019). Contained risk-taking: Preparing preservice teachers to teach controversial issues in three countries. Theory and Research in Social Education, 47(2), 228-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2019.1595240
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(89). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Pedretti, E. G., Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., Romkey, L., & Jivraj, A. (2008). Promoting Issues-based STSE Perspectives in Science Teacher Education: Problems of Identity and Ideology. Science & Education, 17(8), 941-960.
Ryder; J. (2015). Being professional: accountability and authority in teachers’ responses to science curriculum reform. Studies in Science Education, 51(1), 87-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.1001629
*Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 353-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20142
Sadler, T. D., Foulk, J.A, & Friedrichsen, P.J. (2017). Evolution of a model for socio-scientific issue teaching and learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.55999
Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2013). A Pedagogical Model for Ethical Inquiry into Socioscientific Issues In Science. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 253-274.
*Sibic, O., & Topcu, M. S. (2020). Pre-service science teachers’ views towards socio-scientific issues and socio-scientific issue-based instruction. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 6(4), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.749847
Sjöström, J., Frerichs, N., Zin, V. G., & Eilks, I. (2017). Use of the concept of Bildung in the international science education literature, its potential, and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 53, 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1384649
Stenhouse, L. (1983). Authority, education and emancipation. London: Heinemann.
Stradling, R. (1984). The teaching of controversial issues: An evaluation. Educational Review, 36(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191840360202
*Sullivan, S. M. B., Ledley, T. S., Lynds, S. E., & Gold, A. U. (2014). Navigating climate science in the classroom: teacher preparation, perceptions and practices. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(4), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.5408/12-304.1
Sund, P. (2016). Discerning selective traditions in science education: A qualitative study of teachers’ responses to what is important in science teaching. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 387-409.
*Weinberger, Y., & Dreyfus, A. (2013). Teacher college students’ views of controversial environmental issues: Ambivalence and readiness to adopt a stance. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8, 627–643. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2013.224a
Zeidler, D.L., Herman, B.C. & Sadler, T.D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research ,1, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2023). Exploring and expanding the frontiers of socioscientific issues. In Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 899–929). Routledge.
留言 (0)