Comparison of mandibular buccal shelf morphology between adolescents and adults with different vertical patterns using CBCT

Sung EH, Kim SJ, Chun YS, Park YC, Yu HS, Lee KJ. Distalization pattern of whole maxillary dentition according to force application points. Korean J Orthod. 2015;45(1):20–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chung KR, Kim SH, Choo H, Kook YA, Cope JB. Distalization of the mandibular dentition with mini-implants to correct a Class III malocclusion with a midline deviation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(1):135–46.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nishimura M, Sannohe M, Nagasaka H, Igarashi K, Sugawara J. Nonextraction treatment with temporary skeletal anchorage devices to correct a Class II Division 2 malocclusion with excessive gingival display. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;145(1):85–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Scheffler NR, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes and stability in patients with anterior open bite and long anterior face height treated with temporary anchorage devices and a maxillary intrusion splint. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;146(5):594–602.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jing Y, Han X, Guo Y, Li J, Bai D. Nonsurgical correction of a Class III malocclusion in an adult by miniscrew-assisted mandibular denti tion distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143(6):877–87.

Article  Google Scholar 

Maeda A, Sakoguchi Y, Miyawaki S. Patient with oligodontia treated with a miniscrew for unilateral mesial movement of the maxillary molars and alignment of an impacted third molar. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;144(3):430–40.

Article  Google Scholar 

Elshebiny T, Palomo JM, Baumgaertel S. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2018;153(4):505–11.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nucera R, Lo Giudice A, Bellocchio AM, Spinuzza P, Caprioglio A, Perillo L, Matarese G, Cordasco G. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(5):745–51.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chen K, Cao Y. Class III malocclusion treated with distalization of the mandibular dentition with miniscrew anchorage: a 2-year follow-up. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148(6):1043–53.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hosein YK, Smith A, Dunning CE, Tassi A. Insertion torques of self-drilling mini-implants in simulated mandibular bone: assessment of potentia l for implant fracture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(3):e57-64.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu Y, Xu Z, Tan L, Tan L, Zhao Z, Yang P, Li Y, Tang T, Zhao L. Orthodontic mini-implant stability under continuous or intermittent loading: a histomorphometric and biomechanical analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(1):163–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yi J, Ge M, Li M, Li C, Li Y, Li X, Zhao Z. Comparison of the success rate between self-drilling and self-tapping miniscrews: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2017;39(3):287–93.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baumgaertel S. Predrilling of the implant site: is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(6):825–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moon CH, Park HK, Nam JS, Im JS, Baek SH. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;138(1):51–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jing Z, Wu Y, Jiang W, Zhao L, Jing D, Zhang N, Cao X, Xu Z, Zhao Z. Factors affecting the clinical success rate of miniscrew implants for orthodontic treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(4):835–41.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, Hung HC, Lai EH, Yao CC. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage system s. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(6):768–75.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chang C, Liu SS, Roberts WE. Primary failure rate for 1680 extra-alveolar mandibular buccal shelf mini-screws placed in movable mu cosa or attached gingiva. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(6):905–10.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ozdemir F, Tozlu M, Germec-Cakan D. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143(2):190–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gandhi V, Upadhyay M, Tadinada A, Yadav S. Variability associated with mandibular buccal shelf area width and height in subjects with different growth pattern, sex, and growth status. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2021;159(1):59–70.

Article  Google Scholar 

Aleluia RB, Duplat CB, Crusoé-Rebello I, Neves FS. Assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for orthodontic anchorage: influence of side, gender and skeletal patterns. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24(Suppl 1):83–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vargas EOA, Lopes de Lima R, Nojima LI. Mandibular buccal shelf and infrazygomatic crest thicknesses in patients with different vertical facial heights. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2020;158(3):349–56.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2007;132(4):550–60.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2005;128(6):803–11.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2010;137(4 Suppl):S100–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(2):228–31.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, Covell DA. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2011;140(5):734–44.

Article  Google Scholar 

Veyre-Goulet S, Fortin T, Thierry A. Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat. 2008;10(4):226–30.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavalcanti MG. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med. 2009;108(3):430–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Horn AJ. Facial height index. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;102(2):180–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Masumoto T, Hayashi I, Kawamura A, Tanaka K, Kasai K. Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23(1):15–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

MartínezPérez JA, Pérez Martin PS. Intraclass correlation coefficient. Med Fam-semergen. 2023;49(3):101907.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ruquet M, Saliba-Serre B, Tardivo D, Foti B. Estimation of age using alveolar bone loss: forensic and anthropological applications. J Forens Sci. 2015;60(5):1305–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Custodio W, Gomes SG, Faot F, Garcia RC, Del Bel Cury AA. Occlusal force, electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles and mandibular flexure of subjects with different facial types. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(4):343–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gu YJ, Lu SN, Xia WQ, Zhang T, Shi H, Gao MQ. A study on the thickness of buccal bone in the mandible of different vertical facial type in adults using cone-beam CT. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2015;24(3):335–7.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Escobar-Correa N, Ramírez-Bustamante MA, Sánchez-Uribe LA, Upegui-Zea JC, Vergara-Villarreal P, Ramírez-Ossa DM. Evaluation of mandibular buccal shelf characteristics in the Colombian population: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Korean J Orthod. 2021;51(1):23–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang R, Chen X, Huang X. The cone-beam CT study on the slope of oblique plane at the mandibular buccal shelf area in 200 cases. Chin J Orthod. 2020;27(3):121–4.

Google Scholar 

Chen PJ, Lin JJ, Wong YK. Bone thickness of the buccal shelf for orthodontic implant placement. In: Annual meeting of Taiwan Association of Orthodontists; 2009.

Zambrano-De la Peña LS, Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA, Ruiz-Mora GA, Arriola-Guillén LE, Guerrero ME. Bucco alveolar bone thickness of mandibular impacted third molars with different inclinations: a CBCT study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42(9):1051–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(5):779–84.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rossi M, Bruno G, De Stefani A, Perri A, Gracco A. Quantitative CBCT evaluation of maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and density variability for orthodontic miniplate placement. Int Orthod. 2017;15(4):610–24.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129(6):721.e7-12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Swasty D, Lee JS, Huang JC, Maki K, Gansky SA, Hatcher D, Miller AJ. Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(3):491–500.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;139(4):495–503.

Article  Google Scholar 

Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(1):109–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif