Abdulsamee N, Elkhadem AH. Zirconomer and Zirconomer Improved (White Amalgams): restorative Materi-als for the Future. Rev EC Dental Sci. 2017;15:134–50.

Google Scholar 

Arthilakshmi, Vishnurekha C, Annamalai S, Baghkomeh PN, Ditto Sharmin D. Effect of protective coating on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: an In vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2018;29:744–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_490_17.

Asafarlal S. Comparative evaluation of microleakage, surface roughness and hardness of three glass ionomer cements–Zirconomer, Fujii IX Extra GC and Ketac Molar: an in vitro study. Dent. 2017;7:2161–1122.

Google Scholar 

Baskar H, Hari A, Anirudhan S. Comparative evaluation of flexural strength, modulus of elasticity, and microleakage of three different glass ionomer restorative materials in Class V preparations—an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Sci. 2023;15:67–71.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bhatia HP, Singh S, Sood S, Sharma N. A comparative evaluation of sorption, solubility, and compressive strength of three different glass ionomer cements in artificial saliva: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;10:49–54. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1407.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bonifácio CC, Kleverlaan CJ, Raggio DP, Werner A, de Carvalho RC, van Amerongen WE. Physical-mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. Aust Dent J. 2009;54:233–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01125.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brito CR, Velasco LG, Bonini GA, Imparato JC, Raggio DP. Glass ionomer cement hardness after different materials for surface protection. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93:243–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32524.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Camps J, Dejou J, Remusat M, About I. Factors influencing pulpal response to cavity restoration. Dent Mater. 2000;16:432–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00041-5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cefaly DF, Valarelli FP, Seabra BG, Mondelli RF, Navarro MF. Effect of time on the diametral tensile strength of resin-modified restorative glass ionomer cements and compomer. Braz Dent J. 2001;12:201–4.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chuang SF, Jin YT, Tsai PF, Wong TY. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:309–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Crim GA, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. Comparison of four thermocycling techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53:50–3. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.116133.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dalli M, Sahbaz C, Bahsi E, Ince B, Colak H, Zorba YO. The effects of disinfectants on microleakage in Class V cavity: in vitro studies. J Dent Fac Ataturk Uni. 2009;19:14–9.

Google Scholar 

Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel. Dent Mater. 2002;18:454–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00068-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc. 1972;84:1349–57. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1972.0226.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guo T, Yang M, Wang D, Zheng J, Gao SS. Antibiofilm and mechanical properties of silver nanowire-modified glass ionomer cement. J Dent. 2023;135: 104569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104569.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Habib SI, Yassen AA, Bayoumi RE. Influence of nanocoats on the physicomechanical properties and microleakage of bulk-fill and resin-modified glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22:62–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hotz P, McLean JW, Sced I, Wilson AD. The bonding of glass ionomer cements to metal and tooth substrates. Br Dent J. 1977;142:41–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4803864.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kapdan A, Öztaş N. Effects of chlorhexidine and gaseous ozone on microleakage and on the bond strength of dentin bonding agents with compomer restoration on primary teeth. J Dent Sci. 2015;10:46–54.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kathal S, Bhayya DP, Gupta S, Rao A, Pal A, Saxena ST. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of zirconomer, amalgomer CR, and conventional glass ionomer (Type II) as restorative cements in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Care Res. 2017;5:1–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kleverlaan CJ, van Duinen RN, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by curing methods. Dent Mater. 2004;20:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(03)00067-8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Larson TD. The clinical significance and management of microleakage. Part Two Northwest Dent. 2005;84:15–9.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marquezan M, Osorio R, Ciamponi AL, Toledano M. Resistance to degradation of bonded restorations to simulated caries-affected primary dentin. Am J Dent. 2010;23:47–52.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Masih S, Thomas AM, Koshy G, Joshi JL. Comparative evaluation of the microleakage of two modified glass ionomer cements on primary molars. An in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011;29:135–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.84686.

McLean JW, Wilson AD. The clinical development of the glass-ionomer cement. II. Some clinical applications. Aust Dent J. 1977;22:120–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1977.tb04463.x.

Mjor IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries:a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int. 2000;31:165–79.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mount GJ. Longevity in glass-ionomer restorations: review of a successful technique. Quintessence Int. 1997;28:643–50.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mount GJ, Makinson OF. Glass-ionomer restorative cements: clinical implications of the setting reaction. Oper Dent. 1982;7:134–41.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mousavinasab SM, Khoroushi M, Keshani F, Hashemi S. Flexural strength and morphological characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer containing bioactive glass. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011;12:41–6. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1008.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS, Khan AS, Zohaib S, Martí JM, Sauro S, Matinlinna JP, Rehman IU. Modifications in glass ionomer cements: nano-sized fillers and bioactive nanoceramics. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:1134. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17071134.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nalcaci A, Ulusoy N. Effect of thermocycling on microleakage of resin composites polymerized with LED curing techniques. Quintessence Int. 2007;38:e433–9.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B. Kinetic studies of the effect of varnish on water loss by glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1549–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patel MU, Punia SK, Bhat S, Singh G, Bhargava R, Goyal P, et al. An in vitro evaluation of microleakage of posterior teeth restored with amalgam, composite and zirconomer—a stereomicroscopic study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:ZC65–7. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/13024.6225.

Santini A, Ivanovic V, Ibbetson R, Milia E. Influence of cavity configuration on microleakage around Class V restorations bonded with seven self-etching adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16:128–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00020.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sharafeddin F, Feizi N. Evaluation of the effect of adding micro-hydroxyapatite and nano-hydroxyapatite on the microleakage of conventional and resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cl V restorations. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:e242–8. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53216.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sjödin L, Uusitalo M, van Dijken JV. Resin modified glass ionomer cements. In vitro microleakage in direct class V and class II sandwich restorations. Swed Dent J 1996;20:77–86.

Solomon P, Krishna G, Parameswaran A, Pradeep G, Kandaswamy D. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth with class II preparations restored with light cured composite with beta quartz inserts, light cured’composite and silver amalgam in comparison with intact unrestored teeth—an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2007;10:122.

Article  Google Scholar 

Song L, Sarikaya R, Ye Q, Misra A, Tamerler C, Spencer P. Multifunctional monomer acts as co-initiator and crosslinker to provide autonomous strengthening with enhanced hydrolytic stability in dental adhesives. Dent Mater. 2020;36:284–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.11.007.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thongbai-On N, Banomyong D. Flexural strengths and porosities of coated or uncoated, high powder-liquid and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent Sci. 2020;15:433–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.02.004.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ugurlu M. Effects of surface coating on the flexural strength of fluoridereleasing restorative materials after water aging for one year. Eur Oral Res. 2020;54:62–8. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20200042.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Valera VC, Navarro MF, Taga EM, Pascotto RC. Effect of nail varnishes and petroleum jelly combinations on glass ionomer dye uptake. Am J Dent. 1997;10:251–3.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wilder AD Jr, Swift EJ Jr, May KN Jr, Thompson JY, McDougal RA. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. J Dent. 2000;28:367–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00075-5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yilmaz Y, Gurbuz T, Kocogullari ME. The influence of various conditioner agents on the interdiffusion zone and microleakage of a glass lonomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth. Oper Dent. 2005;30:105–12.

PubMed  Google Scholar