• Brooks SC, Clegg GR, Bray J, Deakin CD, Perkins GD, Ringh M, et al. Optimizing outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with innovative approaches to public-access defibrillation: a scientific statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Circulation. 2022;145(13):e776-801. Summarizes current accessibility to defibrillators and provides evidence to support their importance in cardiac arrest.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2023 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023;147(8):e93-621.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG, et al. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S366–468.

•• Sheraton M, Columbus J, Surani S, Chopra R, Kashyap R. Effectiveness of mechanical chest compression devices over manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. West J Emerg Med. 2021;22(4):810–9. Provides recent, meta-analysis data that offers evidence for the use of mechanical compression devices in non-ideal situations such as lack of bystander CPR, unwitnessed arrest, and delayed EMS response times.

Friberg N, Schmidbauer S, Walther C, Englund E. Skeletal and soft tissue injuries after manual and mechanical chest compressions. Eur Heart J - Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019;5(3):259–65.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Szarpak L, Truszewski Z, Czyzewski L, Frass M, Robak O. CPR using the lifeline ARM mechanical chest compression device: a randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(1):96–100.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang PL, Brooks SC. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jun 5];(8). Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007260.pub4/full.

Cave dm, Gazmuri R, Otto C, Cm, Cheng A, Brooks S, et al. Part 7: CPR techniques and devices: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation [Internet]. 2010 Nov 2 [cited 2023 Aug 2];122(18 Suppl 3). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20956223/.

Levy M, Yost D, Walker RG, Scheunemann E, Mendive SR. A quality improvement initiative to optimize use of a mechanical chest compression device within a high-performance CPR approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;92:32–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

LLC D. Defibtech, LLC. 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 14]. Lifeline automatic chest compressor | chest compression device. Available from: https://www.defibtech.com/products/lifeline-arm-acc/.

EASY PULSE - English [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jun 14]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRl6yC0znJU.

Michigan Instruments. Thumper model 1007ccmii mechanical cpr system operation manual [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Jun 14]. Available from: https://www.michiganinstruments.com/automated-cpr/thumper/.

Hospital Store. Hospital Store. 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 3]. Feature comparison. Available from: https://www.hospitalstore.com/compare/.

Dooley S, Mansour MM. Pneumothoraces post mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a case series. Respir Care. 2015;60(7):e118-121.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koster RW, Beenen LF, van der Boom EB, Spijkerboer AM, Tepaske R, van der Wal AC, et al. Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(40):3006–13.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Liu M, Shuai Z, Ai J, Tang K, Liu H, Zheng J, et al. Mechanical chest compression with LUCAS device does not improve clinical outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(44): e17550.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Saleem S, Sonkin R, Sagy I, Strugo R, Jaffe E, Drescher M, et al. traumatic injuries following mechanical versus manual chest compression. Open Access Emerg Med OAEM. 2022;14:557–62. Offers data on the rate of traumatic injuries in mechanical vs. manual compressions that is adjusted for time of CPR delivery.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Posts D. Defibtech announces new arm xr automated chest compression device will debut at fdic [internet]. jems: ems, emergency medical services - training, paramedic, EMT News. 2023 [cited 2023 Jun 14]. Available from: https://www.jems.com/special-topics/defibtech-announces-new-arm-xr-automated-chest-compression-device-will-debut-at-fdic/.

Seewald S, Dopfer S, Wnent J, Jakisch B, Heller M, Lefering R, et al. Differences between manual CPR and corpuls cpr in regard to quality and outcome: study protocol of the comparing observational multi-center prospective registry study on resuscitation (COMPRESS). Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021;29(1):39.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Corpuls. GS corpuls. 2023 [cited 2023 Jun 14]. corpuls cpr - Thorax compression device. Available from: https://corpuls.world/en/products/corpuls-cpr/.

Wieczorek W, Kaminska H. Impact of a Corpuls CPR mechanical chest compression device on chest compression quality during extended pediatric manikin resuscitation: a randomized crossover pilot study. Disaster Emerg Med J. 2017;2(2):58–63.

Article  Google Scholar 

Eichhorn S, Mendoza Garcia A, Polski M, Spindler J, Stroh A, Heller M, et al. Corpuls cpr resuscitation device generates superior emulated flows and pressures than LUCAS II in a mechanical thorax model. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2017;40(2):441–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eichhorn S, Mendoza A, Prinzing A, Stroh A, Xinghai L, Polski M, et al. Corpuls CPR generates higher mean arterial pressure than LUCAS II in a pig model of cardiac arrest. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:5470406.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ruemmler R, Stein J, Duenges B, Renz M, Hartmann EK. Standardized post-resuscitation damage assessment of two mechanical chest compression devices: a prospective randomized large animal trial. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021;29(1):79.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ogawa Y, Shiozaki T, Hirose T, Ohnishi M, Nakamori Y, Ogura H, et al. Load-distributing-band cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest increases regional cerebral oxygenation: a single-center prospective pilot study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015;23(1):99.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ong MEH, Ornato JP, Edwards DP, Dhindsa HS, Best AM, Ines CS, et al. Use of an automated, load-distributing band chest compression device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. JAMA. 2006;295(22):2629–37.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wik L, Olsen JA, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M, Brouwer MA, et al. Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014 Jun;85(6):741–8.

Lyon RM, Crawford A, Crookston C, Short S, Clegg GR. The combined use of mechanical CPR and a carry sheet to maintain quality resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients during extrication and transport. Resuscitation. 2015;93:102–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gorący J, Stachowiak P, Krejczy A, Piątek P, Gorący I. Efficacy of AutoPulse for mechanical chest compression in patients with shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(5):2557.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pietsch U, Knapp J, Wenzel V, Lischke V, Albrecht R. Automatic load-distributing band CPR (AutoPulseTM) in prone position, feasible? Anaesthesist. 2021;70(3):247–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Primi R, Bendotti S, Currao A, Sechi GM, Marconi G, Pamploni G, et al. Use of mechanical chest compression for resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-device matters: a propensity-score-based match analysis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(13):4429. Recent evidence that shows load-distributing-band devices are the only mechanical chest able to favorably affect 30-day survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alexander E, Katharina T, Verena F, Jürgen G, Maximilian N, Calvin K, et al. Comparison of different mechanical chest compression devices in the alpine rescue setting: a randomized triple crossover experiment. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021;29(1):84.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Östlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld RA, et al. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311(1):53–61.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J, et al. Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2015;385(9972):947–55.

Article  Google Scholar 

Couper K, Yeung J, Nicholson T, Quinn T, Lall R, Perkins GD. Mechanical chest compression devices at in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2016;1(103):24–31.

Article  Google Scholar 

•• Gao Y, Sun T, Yuan D, Liang H, Wan Y, Yuan B, et al. Safety of mechanical and manual chest compressions in cardiac arrest patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2021;1(169):124–35. Provides meta-analysis data that demonstrates mechanical compressions are not associated with increased risk of life-threatening injuries.

Article  Google Scholar 

Friebel F, Hermanussen M, Scheffler C. Popular ideas and convictions about factors influencing the growth as well as the adult height of children: a German-French comparison. Anthropol Anz Ber Uber Biol-Anthropol Lit. 2019;76(5):365–70.

Google Scholar 

Ihnát Rudinská L, Hejna P, Ihnát P, Tomášková H, Smatanová M, Dvořáček I. Intra-thoracic injuries associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation - Frequent and serious. Resuscitation. 2016;103:66–70.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Menegazzi JJ, Salcido DD, Housler GJ, Logue ES. Feasibility of initiating extracorporeal life support during mechanical chest compression CPR: a porcine pilot study. Resuscitation. 2012;83(1):130–3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Mistraletti G, Lancioni A, Bassi G, Nespoli F, Umbrello M, Salini S, et al. Mechanical chest compression and extracorporeal life support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A 30-month observational study in the metropolitan area of Milan, Italy. Resuscitation. 2023;182. Rare, recent study that shows improved outcomes with mechanical chest compressions, such as better neurological recovery, after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Ahn HJ, Kim KD, Jeong WJ, Lee JW, Yoo IS, Ryu S. The adequacy of a conventional mechanical ventilator as a ventilation method during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a manikin study. Korean J Crit Care Med. 2015;30(2):89–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Senthilnathan M, Ravi R, Suganya S, Kumar Sivakumar R. Manual vs. mechanical ventilation in patients with advanced airway during CPR. Indian Heart J. 2022;74(5):428–9.

CCSV: The Innovation in Resuscitation [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 23]. Available from: https://www.weinmann-emergency.com/news/news-press/ccsv-the-innovation-in-resuscitation/.

Dersch W, Wallot P, Hahn O, Sauerbrei C, Jerrentrup A, Neuhaus C, et al. Resuscitation and mechanical ventilation with Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation (CCSV) or Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV): influence on gas exchange and return of spontaneous circulation in a pig model. Category: CPR Systems. Resuscitation. 2012;83:e3.