Pattern Recognition of Airway Management Barriers and Associated Troubleshooting Methods

Arulkumaran N, Lowe J, Ions R, et al. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for emergency orotracheal intubation outside the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(4):712–24.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Trent S, Kaji A, Carlson J et al. National Emergency Airway Registry Investigators. Video Laryngoscopy Is Associated With First-Pass Success in Emergency Department Intubations for Trauma Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the National Emergency Airway Registry. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;78(6):708–719.

Lewis S, Butler A, Parker J, et al. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation: a Cochrane Systematic Review. Br J Anaesth. 2017Sep;119(3):369–83.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maassen R, Pieters B, Maathuis B, et al. Endotracheal intubation using video laryngoscopy causes less cardiovascular response compared to classic direct laryngoscopy, in cardiac patients according to a standard hospital protocol. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2012;63(4):181–6.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berkow L, Morey T, Urdaneta F. The Technology of Video Laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2018May;126(5):1527–34.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Magnan P. Detection of visible photons in CCD and CMOS: A comparative view. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect A. 2003;504(1–3):199–212.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Cook TM, Kelly FE. A national survey of video laryngoscopy in the United Kingdom. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(4):593–600.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang J, Jiang W, Urdaneta F. Economic Analysis of the use of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the surgical setting. J Compar Effective Res. 2021;10(10):831–44.

Article  Google Scholar 

King BJ, Padnos I, Mancuso K, Christensen BJ. Comparing video and direct laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Prog. 2020;67(4):193–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Peterson JD, Puricelli MD, Alkhateeb A, Figueroa AD, Fletcher SL, Smith RJ, et al. Rigid video laryngoscopy for intubation in severe Pierre Robin Sequence: A retrospective review. Laryngoscope. 2020;131(7):1647–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ruetzler K, Rivas E, Cohen B, Mosteller L, Martin A, Keebler A, et al. McGrath video laryngoscope versus Macintosh direct laryngoscopy for intubation of morbidly obese patients: A randomized trial. Anesth Analg. 2020;131(2):586–93.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karalapillai D, Darvall J, Mandeville J, Ellard L, Graham J, Weinberg L. A review of video laryngoscopes relevant to the Intensive Care Unit. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2014;18(7):442–52. Published July 2014. Accessed July 30, 2022.

Mosier J, Stolz U, Chiu S, Sakles J. Difficult Airway Management in the Emergency Department: GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy Compared to Direct Laryngoscopy. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. Volume 42, Issue 6, P629–634. Published June 1, 2012. Accessed July 30, 2022.

Godet T, De Jong A, Garin C, et al. Impact of Macintosh blade size on endotracheal intubation success in intensive care units: a retrospective multicenter observational MacSize-ICU study. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(9):1176–84.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Driver BE, Prekker ME, Levitan RM, Corajod J, Karl E, Smith AD, et al. Engagement of the median glossoepiglottic fold and laryngeal view during emergency department intubation. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;78(6):699–707.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Weingart SD, Barnicle RN, Janke A, Bhagwan SD, Tanzi M, McKenna PJ, Bracey A; Resuscitationists Research Group. A taxonomy of key performance errors for emergency intubation. Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Aug 23;73:137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.08.035.

Passi Y, Sathyamoorthy M, Lerman J, et al. Comparison of the laryngoscopy views with the size 1 Miller and Macintosh laryngoscope blades lifting the epiglottis or the base of the tongue in infants and children <2 yr of age. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(5):869–74.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Levitan RM, Ochroch EA, Kush S, et al. Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:919–23.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif