Rozanski A, Han D, Miller RJH, et al. Decline in typical angina among patients referred for cardiac stress testing. J Nucl Cardiol Off Publ Am Soc Nucl Cardiol 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03305-4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Juarez-Orozco LE, Saraste A, Capodanno D, et al. Impact of a decreasing pre-test probability on the performance of diagnostic tests for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;20:1198‐207.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2021;144:e368-454.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2020;41:407‐77.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dilsizian V, Bacharach SL, Beanlands RS, et al. ASNC imaging guidelines/SNMMI procedure standard for positron emission tomography (PET) nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol Off Publ Am Soc Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:1187‐226.

Google Scholar 

Mc Ardle BA, Dowsley TF, deKemp RA, Wells GA, Beanlands RS. Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1828‐37.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sciagrà R, Lubberink M, Hyafil F, et al. EANM procedural guidelines for PET/CT quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021;48:1040‐69.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Merhige ME, Breen WJ, Shelton V, Houston T, D’Arcy BJ, Perna AF. Impact of myocardial perfusion imaging with PET and (82)Rb on downstream invasive procedure utilization, costs, and outcomes in coronary disease management. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med 2007;48:1069‐76.

Google Scholar 

Hlatky MA, Shilane D, Hachamovitch R, DiCarli MF. Economic outcomes in the study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease registry: the SPARC study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1002‐8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mimouni M, Bulsei J, Darlington M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of 82-Rubidium PET myocardial perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia depending on the prevalence of coronary artery disease. EJNMMI Res 2023;8:9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Valenti V, Hartaigh B, Heo R, et al. A 15-year warranty period for asymptomatic individuals without coronary artery calcium: a prospective follow-up of 9,715 individuals. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:900‐9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Agha AM, Pacor J, Grandhi GR, et al. The prognostic value of CAC zero among individuals presenting with chest pain: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2022;15:1745‐57.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clerc OF, Frey SM, Honegger U, et al. Coronary artery calcium score and pre-test probabilities as gatekeepers to predict and rule out perfusion defects in positron emission tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03322-3.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Frey SM, Clerc OF, Honegger U, et al. The power of zero calcium in 82-Rubidium PET irrespective of sex and age. J Nucl Cardiol 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-022-03174-3.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jayadeva PS, Stowers S, Tang EW, et al. The impact of coronary calcium score as an addition to myocardial perfusion imaging in altering clinical management (ICCAMPA trial). J Nucl Cardiol Off Publ Am Soc Nucl Cardiol 2023;30:1004‐18.

Google Scholar 

Aljizeeri A, Ahmed AI, Alfaris MA, et al. Myocardial flow reserve and coronary calcification in prognosis of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;14:2443‐52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Murthy VL, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS, et al. Clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow using PET: joint position paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC. J Nucl Med 2018;59:273‐93.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patel KK, Peri-Okonny PA, Qarajeh R, et al. Prognostic relationship between coronary artery calcium score, perfusion defects, and myocardial blood flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2022;15:e012599.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Miller RJH, Han D, Singh A, et al. Relationship between ischaemia, coronary artery calcium scores, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J—Cardiovasc Imaging 2022;23:1423‐33.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taqueti VR, Hachamovitch R, Murthy VL, et al. Global coronary flow reserve is associated with adverse cardiovascular events independently of luminal angiographic severity and modifies the effect of early revascularization. Circulation 2015;131:19‐27.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar