Hunt E.B. Marin J. Stone P.J.

Experiments in induction. Academic Press.

() ()

Learning Machines: Foundations of Trainable Pattern-Classifying Systems. McGraw-Hill.

() ()

Principles of Neurodynamics: Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms. Spartan Books.

() ()

Machine Learning Algorithms - A Review.

Int J Sci Res. https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20203995Spiegelhalter D. Dawid A. Lauritzen S. et al.

1993 undefined. Bayesian analysis in expert systems. JSTOR.

() ()

Unsupervised Learning.

() ()

Reinforcement learning: an introduction.

2nd ed. MIT Press, () ()Rajkomar A. Dean J. Kohane I.

Machine learning in medicine.

N Engl J Med. 380: 1347-1358Bertsimas D. Orfanoudaki A. Weiner R.B.

Personalized treatment for coronary artery disease patients: a machine learning approach.

Health Care Manag Sci. 23: 482-506To err is human: building a safer health system. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCRichens J.G. Lee C.M. Johri S.

Improving the accuracy of medical diagnosis with causal machine learning.

Nat Commun. 11: 1-9Schaefer J. Lehne M. Schepers J. et al.

The use of machine learning in rare diseases: a scoping review.

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 15: 1-10

Medicine and the computer.

N Engl J Med. 283: 1257-1264Schläpfer J. Wellens H.J.

Computer-Interpreted Electrocardiograms: benefits and Limitations.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 70: 1183-1192Waljee A.K. Higgins P.D.R.

Machine learning in medicine: a primer for physicians.

Am J Gastroenterol. 105: 1224-1226Lammers D.T. Eckert C.M. Ahmad M.A. et al.

A surgeon’s guide to machine learning.

Ann Surg. : 1-5https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000091

Learning by being told and learning from examples: An experimental comparison of the two methods of knowledge acquisition.

Int J Policy Anal Inf Syst. 4 () ()

Discovering Rules from Large Collections of Examples: A Case Study. Edinburgh University Press.

() ()

An experimental comparison of inducing decision trees and decision lists in noisy domains. Proceedings of the Fourth European Working Session on Learning.

() ()Lesmo L. Saitta L. Torasso P.

Learning of fuzzy production rules for medical diagnosis.

Approximate Reasoning Decis Anal. : 901-912https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-1450-4.50095-X

Cestnik B, Kononenko I, Bratko I. ASSISTANT 86: a knowledge-elicitation tool for sophisticated users. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on European Working Session on Learning. Published online 1987. Accessed July 10, 2022. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/3108739.3108742

Estimating attributes: Analysis and extensions of RELIEF.

Lecture Notes Computer Sci (including subseries Lecture Notes Artif Intelligence Lecture Notes Bioinformatics). 784 LNCS: 171-182Urbanowicz R.J. Meeker M. la Cava W. et al.

Relief-based feature selection: introduction and review.

J Biomed Inform. 85: 189-203Zhu F. Li X. Tang H. et al.

Machine learning for the preliminary diagnosis of dementia.

Scientific Programming. 2020https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5629090Ghosh P. Azam S. Jonkman M. et al.

Efficient prediction of cardiovascular disease using machine learning algorithms with relief and lasso feature selection techniques.

IEEE Access. 9: 19304-19326

Probabilistic first-order classification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics).

. 1297: 235-242https://doi.org/10.1007/3540635149_52/COVER/

Artificial BCProc 9th EC on, 1990 undefined. Estimating probabilities: A crucial task in machine learning. ci.nii.ac.jp.

() ()

Induction of recursive bayesian classifiers.

Lecture Notes Computer Sci (including subseries Lecture Notes Artif Intelligence Lecture Notes Bioinformatics). 667 LNAI: 153-164

Perceptrons Cambridge. MIT Press.

() ()

Nwankpa C., Ijomah W., Gachagan A., et al. Activation Functions: Comparison of trends in Practice and Research for Deep Learning. arXiv181103378, 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.03378.

Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C. “Why should i trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2016;13-17-August-2016:1135-1144. doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778

Neural networks, a comprehensive foundation.

Int J Neural Syst. 5 (): 363-364

Natural Language Processing and Its Future in Medicine. Information Resources.

() ()Ker J. Wang L. Rao J. et al.

Deep Learning Applications in Medical Image Analysis.

IEEE Access. 6: 9375-9379Alanazi H.O. Abdullah A.H. Qureshi K.N.

A Critical Review for Developing Accurate and Dynamic Predictive Models Using Machine Learning Methods in Medicine and Health Care.

J Med Syst. 41: 1-10

Covariate-adjusted adaptive randomization in a sarcoma trial with multi-stage treatments.

Stat Med. 24: 1947-1964Murphy S.A. Oslin D.W. Rush A.J. et al.

Methodological Challenges in Constructing Effective Treatment Sequences for Chronic Psychiatric Disorders.

Neuropsychopharmacology. 32 (): 257-262Yu C. Dong Y. Liu J. et al.

Incorporating causal factors into reinforcement learning for dynamic treatment regimes in HIV.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 19: 19-29Bossuyt P.M. Reitsma J.B. Bruns D.E. et al.

STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.

BMJ. 351https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.H5527Buchlak Q.D. Esmaili N. Leveque J.C. et al.

Machine learning applications to clinical decision support in neurosurgery: an artificial intelligence augmented systematic review.

Neurosurg Rev. 43: 1235-1253

Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Semin Nucl Med. 8: 283-298Mantelakis A. Assael Y. Sorooshian P. et al.

Machine Learning Demonstrates High Accuracy for Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis in Plastic Surgery.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 9https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003638Lötsch J. Ultsch A. Kalso E.

Prediction of persistent post-surgery pain by preoperative cold pain sensitivity: biomarker development with machine-learning-derived analysis.

BJA: Br J Anaesth. 119: 821-829

An introduction to ROC analysis.

Pattern Recognition Lett. 27: 861-874Carrington A.M. Fieguth P.W. Qazi H. et al.

A new concordant partial AUC and partial c statistic for imbalanced data in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 20: 1-12Benedetto U. Dimagli A. Sinha S. et al.

Machine learning improves mortality risk prediction after cardiac surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 163: 2075-2087.e9Hilden J. Habbema J.D.F. Bjerregaard B.

The measurement of performance in probabilistic diagnosis. II. Trustworthiness of the exact values of the diagnostic probabilities.

Methods Inf Med. 17: 227-237

Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model.

Commun Stat - Theor Methods. 9: 1043-1069Staartjes V.E. Serra C. Muscas G. et al.

Utility of deep neural networks in predicting gross-total resection after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: a pilot study.

Neurosurg Focus. 45: E12Barber E.L. Garg R. Persenaire C. et al.

Natural language processing with machine learning to predict outcomes after ovarian cancer surgery.

Gynecol Oncol. 160: 182-186

Goodness-of-fit processes for logistic regression: Simulation results.

Stat Med. 21: 2723-2738

Use of Brier score to assess binary predictions.

J Clin Epidemiol. 63: 938-939

Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation.

J Am Stat Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000001437Redelmeier D.A. Bloch D.A. Hickam D.H.

Assessing predictive accuracy: how to compare Brier scores.

J Clin Epidemiol. 44: 1141-1146

Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature.

Geoscientific Model Development. 7: 1247-1250

Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance on JSTOR.

Clim Res. 30 () (): 79-82

Root-mean-square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): when to use them or not.

Geoscientific Model Development. 15: 5481-5487Jackson T.D. Wannares J.J. Lancaster R.T. et al.

Does speed matter? the impact of operative time on outcome in laparoscopic surgery.

Surg Endosc. 25: 2288-2295

Use and Misuse of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Risk Prediction.

Circulation. 115: 928-935van Esbroeck A. Rubinfeld I. Hall B. et al.

Quantifying surgical complexity with machine learning: Looking beyond patient factors to improve surgical models.

Surgery. 156: 1097-1105Bertrand P.v. Sakamoto Y. Ishiguro M. et al.

Akaike Information Criterion Statistics.

J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 151: 567Kerr K.F. McClelland R.L. Brown E.R. et al.

Evaluating the incremental value of new biomarkers with integrated discrimination improvement.

Am J Epidemiol. 174: 364-374

Alternative Performance Measures for Prediction Models.

PLOS ONE. 9: e91249Laine C. Goodman S.N. Griswold M.E. et al.

Reproducible research: moving toward research the public can really trust.

Ann Intern Med. 146: 450-453

Interpretability of deep learning models: A survey of results," 2017 IEEE SmartWorld.

Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI). : 1-6https://doi.org/10.1109/UIC-ATC.2017.8397411Ribeiro M.T. Singh S. Guestrin C.

Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learning.

arxiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1606.05386DiRusso S.M. Sullivan T. Holly C. et al.

An artificial neural network as a model for prediction of survival in trauma patients: validation for a regional trauma area.

J Trauma. 49: 212-223

6.1. Pipelines and composite estimators — scikit-learn 1.1.1 documentation.

() ()

Five sources of bias in natural language processing.

Lang Linguistics Compass. 15: e12432

A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network.

J R Soc Med. 109: 67-77

What is wrong with the medical curriculum?.

The Lancet. 220: 253-254

Statistical Evaluation of Medical Journal Manuscripts.

JAMA. 195: 1123-1128Begg C. Cho M. Eastwood S. et al.

Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.

JAMA. 276: 637-639Collins G.S. Reitsma J.B. Altman D.G. et al.

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement.

BMC Med. 13: 1-10Wolff R.F. Moons K.G.M. Riley R.D. et al.

PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies.

Ann Intern Med. 170: 51-58

Data mining: An overview from a database perspective.

IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng. 8: 866-883

Knowledge discovery and data mining in biomedical informatics: The future is in integrative, interactive machine learning solutions.

Lecture Notes Computer Sci (including subseries Lecture Notes Artif Intelligence Lecture Notes Bioinformatics). 8401: 1-18Xiong H. Pandey G. Steinbach M. et al.

Enhancing data analysis with noise removal.

IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng. 18: 304-319

Scalability and efficiency in multi-relational data mining.

ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsl. 5: 17-30Cios K.J. William Moore G.

Uniqueness of medical data mining.

Artif Intelligence Med. 26: 1-24

Big data in public health: terminology, machine learning, and privacy.

Annu Rev Public Health. 39: 95

Machine learning and radiology.

Med Image Anal. 16: 933-951

Image analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: Challenges and opportunities.

Med Image Anal. 33: 170-175

Machine learning for predicting outcomes in trauma.

Shock. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000898Mc Gonigal M.D. Cole J. Schwab C.W. et al.

A new approach to probability of survival scoring for trauma quality assurance.

J Trauma. 34: 863-870Joseph B. Pandit V. Rhee P. et al.

Predicting hospital discharge disposition in geriatric trauma patients: Is frailty the answer?.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a833acMitchell R.J. Ting H.P. Driscoll T. et al.

Identification and internal validation of models for predicting survival and ICU admission following a traumatic injury.

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 26: 95https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0563-5Ho V.P. Towe C.W. Chan J. et al.

How’s the Weather? Relationship Between Weather and Trauma Admissions at a Level I Trauma Center.

World J Surg. 39: 934-939https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2881-8Yang S. Mackenzie C.F. Rock P. et al.

Comparison of massive and emergency transfusion prediction scoring systems after trauma with a new Bleeding Risk Index score applied in-flight.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 90: 268-273Rashidi H.H. Sen S. Palmieri T.L. et al.

Early Recognition of Burn- and Trauma-Related Acute Kidney Injury: A Pilot Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques.

Scientific Rep. 10: 1-9Amorim R.L. Oliveira L.M. Malbouisson L.M. et al.

Prediction of Early TBI Mortality Using a Machine Learning Approach in a LMIC Population.

Front Neurol. 10: 1366Ehlers A.P. Roy S.B. Khor S. et al.

Improved risk prediction following surgery using machine learning algorithms.

eGEMs. 5: 3Bihorac A. Ozrazgat-Baslanti T. Ebadi A. et al.

MySurgeryRisk: Development and Validation of a Machine-Learning Risk Algorithm for Major Complications and Death after Surgery.

Ann Surg. 269: 652Corey K.M. Kashyap S. Lorenzi E. et al.

Development and validation of machine learning models to identify high-risk surgical patients using automatically curated electronic health record data (Pythia): A retrospective, single-site study.

PLOS Med. 15: e1002701Ward A. Jani T. de Souza E. et al.

Prediction of Prolonged Opioid Use after Surgery in Adolescents: Insights from Machine Learning.

Anesth Analgesia. 133: 304-313Li Y. Xu J. Wang Y. et al.

A novel machine learning algorithm, Bayesian networks model, to predict the high-risk patients with cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury.

Clin Cardiol. 43: 752-761Olczak J. Fahlberg N. Maki A. et al.

Artificial intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs: Deep learning algorithms—are they on par with humans for diagnosing fractures?.

Acta Orthopaedica. 88: 581-586Choy G. Khalilzadeh O. Michalski M. et al.

Current Applications and Future Impact of Machine Learning in Radiology.

Radiology. 288: 318Olthof A.W. Shouche P. Fennema E.M. et al.

Machine learning based natural language processing of radiology reports in orthopaedic trauma.

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 208: 106304Weikert T. Noordtzij L.A. Bremerich J. et al.

Assessment of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Rib Fractures on Whole-Body Trauma Computed Tomography.

Korean J Radiol. 21: 891Jin L. Yang J. Kuang K. et al.

Deep-learning-assisted detection and segmentation of rib fractures from CT scans: Development and validation of FracNet.

eBioMedicine. 62: 103106Assaf D. Rayman S. Segev L. et al.

Improving pre-bariatric surgery diagnosis of hiatal hernia using machine learning models.

Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 31: 760-767Liu C. Qi L. Feng Q.X. et al.

Performance of a machine learning-based decision model to help clinicians decide the extent of lymphadenectomy (D1 vs. D2) in gastric cancer before surgical resection.

Abdom Radiol. 44: 3019-3029Wijnberge M. Geerts B.F. Hol L. et al.

Effect of a Machine Learning–Derived Early Warning System for Intraoperative Hypotension vs Standard Care on Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension During Elective Noncardiac Surgery: The HYPE Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA. 323: 1052-1060Lundberg S.M. Nair B. Vavilala M.S. et al.

Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery HHS Public Access Author manuscript.

Nat Biomed Eng. 2: 749-760Saravi B. Hassel F. Ülkümen S. et al.

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prediction Modeling and Decision-making in Spine Surgery Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models.

J Personalized Med. 12: 509Senders J.T. Staples P.C. Karhade A.v. et al.

Machine Learning and Neurosurgical Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review.

World Neurosurg. 109: 476-486.e1Knoops P.G.M. Papaioannou A. Borghi A. et al.

A machine learning framework for automated diagnosis and computer-assisted planning in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Scientific Rep. 9: 1-12D’Alfonso T.M. Ho D.J. Hanna M.G. et al.

Multi-magnification-based machine learning as an ancillary tool for the pathologic assessment of shaved margins for breast carcinoma lumpectomy specimens.

Mod Pathol. 34: 1487-1494Tighe D. Fabris F. Freitas A.

Machine learning methods applied to audit of surgical margins after curative surgery for head and neck cancer.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 59: 209-216Marsden M. Weyers B.W. Bec J. et al.

Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer Using Label-Free Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging and Machine Learning.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 68: 857-868Martinez O. Martinez C. Parra C.A. et al.

Machine learning for surgical time prediction.

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 208: 106220Bartek M.A. Saxena R.C. Solomon S. et al.

Improving operating room efficiency: machine learning approach to predict case-time duration.

J Am Coll Surg. 229: 346-354.e3Tuwatananurak J.P. Zadeh S. Xu X. et al.

Machine learning can improve estimation of surgical case duration: a pilot study.

J Med Syst. 43: 1-7Bellini V. Guzzon M. Bigliardi B. et al.

Artificial Intelligence: A New Tool in Operating Room Management. Role of Machine Learning Models in Operating Room Optimization.

J Med Syst. 44: 1-10

Can machine learning optimize the efficiency of the operating room in the era of COVID-19?.

Can J Surg. 63: E527Dias R.D. Gupta A. Yule S.J.

Using machine learning to assess physician competence: a systematic review.

Acad Med. 94: 427-439Winkler-Schwartz A. Bissonnette V. Mirchi N. et al.

Artificial intelligence in medical education: best practices using machine learning to assess surgical expertise in virtual reality simulation.

J Surg Education. 76: 1681-1690

Use of a machine learning algorithm to classify expertise: analysis of hand motion patterns during a simulated surgical task.

Acad Med. 89: 1163-1167Thanawala R. Jesneck J. Seymour N.E.

Novel educational information management platform improves the surgical skill evaluation process of surgical residents.

J Surg Education. 75: e204-e211Rogers M.P. DeSantis A.J. Janjua H. et al.

The future surgical training paradigm: Virtual reality and machine learning in surgical education.

Surgery. 169: 1250-1252Anh N.X. Nataraja R.M. Chauhan S.

Towards near real-time assessment of surgical skills: a comparison of feature extraction techniques.

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 187: 105234Wu C. Cha J. Sulek J. et al.

Eye-tracking metrics predict perceived workload in robotic surgical skills training.

Hum Factors. 62: 1365-1386Ismail Fawaz H. Forestier G. Weber J. et al.

Accurate and interpretable evaluation of surgical skills from kinematic data using fully convolutional neural networks.

Int J Computer Assisted Radiol Surg. 14: 1611-1617

Your Machine Learning and Data Science Community.

() ()

HackerNoon - read, write and learn about any technology.

() ()