Xu J. Cao J.Y. Chaggar G.S. et al.

Comparison of outpatient versus inpatient total hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications.

J Orthop. 2020; 17: 38-43View in Article Google ScholarDarrith B. Frisch N.B. Tetreault M.W. et al.

Inpatient versus outpatient arthroplasty: a single-surgeon, matched cohort analysis of 90-day complications.

J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 221-227View in Article Google ScholarMascioli A.A. Shaw M.L. Boykin S. et al.

Total knee arthroplasty in freestanding ambulatory surgery centers: 5-year retrospective chart review of 90-day postsurgical outcomes and health care resource utilization.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021; https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00934View in Article Google ScholarSmith A.F. Eccles C.J. Bhimani S.J. et al.

Improved patient satisfaction following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

J Knee Surg. 2021; 34: 730-738View in Article Google ScholarCho K.J. Seon J.K. Jang W.Y. et al.

Robotic versus conventional primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological long-term results with a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Int Orthop. 2019; 43: 1345-1354View in Article Google ScholarKim Y.H. Yoon S.H. Park J.W.

Does robotic-assisted TKA result in better outcome scores or long-term survivorship than conventional TKA? A randomized, controlled trial.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020; 478: 266-275View in Article Google ScholarSultan A.A. Piuzzi N. Khlopas A. et al.

Utilization of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty for soft tissue protection.

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017; 14: 925-927View in Article Google ScholarSeidenstein A. Birmingham M. Foran J. et al.

Better accuracy and reproducibility of a new robotically-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional instrumentation: a cadaveric study.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29: 859-866View in Article Google ScholarParratte S. Price A.J. Jeys L.M. et al.

Accuracy of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 2799-2803View in Article Google ScholarLonner J.H. Seidenstein A.D. Charters M.A. et al.

Improved accuracy and reproducibility of a novel CT-free robotic surgical assistant for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with conventional instrumentation: a cadaveric study.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06626-4View in Article Google ScholarScott C.E. Howie C.R. MacDonald D. et al.

Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92: 1253-1258View in Article Google ScholarSiddiqi A. Mont M.A. Krebs V.E. et al.

Not all robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty are the same.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021; 29: 45-59View in Article Google ScholarSiddiqi A. Horan T. Molloy R.M. et al.

A clinical review of robotic navigation in total knee arthroplasty: historical systems to modern design.

EFORT Open Rev. 2021; 6: 252-269View in Article Google ScholarCrizer M.P. Haffar A. Battenberg A. et al.

Robotic assistance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in superior early functional recovery and is more likely to meet patient expectations.

Adv Orthop. 2021; 2021: 4770960View in Article Google ScholarSephton B.M. De la Cruz N. Shearman A. et al.

Achieving discharge within 24 h of robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty may be possible with appropriate patient selection and a multi-disciplinary team approach.

J Orthop. 2020; 19: 223-228View in Article Google ScholarCherry A. Montgomery S. Brillantes J. et al.

Converting hip and knee arthroplasty cases to same-day surgery due to COVID-19.

Bone Jt Open. 2021; 2: 545-551View in Article Google ScholarLan R.H. Samuel L.T. Grits D. et al.

Contemporary outpatient arthroplasty is safe compared with inpatient surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis of 574,375 procedures.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021; 103: 593-600View in Article Google ScholarDeMik D.E. Carender C.N. An Q. et al.

Has removal from the inpatient-only list increased complications after outpatient total knee arthroplasty?.

J Arthroplasty. 2021; 36 (e2291): 2297-2301View in Article Google ScholarMarchand R.C. Sodhi N. Anis H.K. et al.

One-year patient outcomes for robotic-arm-assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty.

J Knee Surg. 2019; 32: 1063-1068View in Article Google ScholarKhlopas A. Sodhi N. Hozack W.J. et al.

Patient-reported functional and satisfaction outcomes after robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective multicenter investigation.

J Knee Surg. 2020; 33: 685-690View in Article Google ScholarCotter E.J. Wang J. Illgen R.L.

Comparative cost analysis of robotic-assisted and jig-based manual primary total knee arthroplasty.

J Knee Surg. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1713895View in Article Google ScholarVermue H. Tack P. Gryson T. et al.

Can robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty be a cost-effective procedure? A Markov decision analysis.

Knee. 2021; 29: 345-352View in Article Google ScholarMont M.A. Cool C. Gregory D. et al.

Health care utilization and payer cost analysis of robotic arm assisted total knee arthroplasty at 30, 60, and 90 days.

J Knee Surg. 2021; 34: 328-337View in Article Google ScholarCool C.L. Jacofsky D.J. Seeger K.A. et al.

A 90-day episode-of-care cost analysis of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty.

J Comp Eff Res. 2019; 8: 327-336View in Article Google ScholarKayani B. Konan S. Huq S.S. et al.

Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27: 1132-1141View in Article Google ScholarSodhi N. Khlopas A. Piuzzi N.S. et al.

The learning curve associated with robotic total knee arthroplasty.

J Knee Surg. 2018; 31: 17-21View in Article Google ScholarCoon T.M.

Integrating robotic technology into the operating room.

Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009; 38 (PMID: 19340376): 7-9View in Article Google Scholar