Background: Due to anatomical deviations, assumptions of the conventional calibration method for gait analysis may be violated in individuals with rotational deformities of the femur. We compared functional calibration methods with conventional methods in this group for 1) localization of the hip joint center (HJC) and knee axis orientation, and 2) gait kinematics. Methods: Twenty-four adolescents with idiopathic rotational deformity of the femur underwent gait analysis and a CT scan. During standing, distance between HJCs and knee axis orientation were compared between calibration methods, with CT serving as reference for HJC estimation. Gait kinematics were compared using statistical parameter mapping (SPM). Findings: Functional calibration methods estimated the HJC closer to the CT reference (26±21mm more lateral) than the conventional method (38±21mm more medial). In the full sample, orientation of the knee joint axis was not different between calibration methods, but in adolescents with increased femoral anteversion, the knee was more internally rotated with the functional method (3.3±6.2°). During gait, SPM revealed significantly more hip flexion, more internal hip rotation during the stance phase, less knee varus-valgus motion, and larger knee flexion angles when applying the functional calibration method. Interpretation: Functional calibration methods better approximated the HJC, and showed a knee axis orientation that was more towards the direction of the deformity. This resulted in less knee joint angle crosstalk during gait. Although differences between calibration methods on gait kinematics were within clinically acceptable limits for the sagittal plane, relatively larger differences on transversal hip kinematics may hold clinical importance.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

The Innovation Fund of the Sint Maartenskliniek sponsored this study

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek Arnhem/Nijmegen waived ethical approval for this work

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors