Varacallo M. Luo D.

Total hip arthroplasty techniques.

StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL)2021View in Article Google ScholarNguyen L.C.L. Lehil M.S. Bozic K.J.

Trends in Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant Utilization.

J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30: 739-742View in Article Scopus (44) PubMed Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google ScholarSantaguida P.L. Hawker G.A. Hudak P.L. et al.

Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Can J Surg. 2008; 51View in Article Google ScholarKlug A. Gramlich Y. Rudert M. et al.

The projected volume of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will place an immense burden on future health care systems over the next 30 years.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06154-7View in Article Scopus (59) Crossref Google ScholarSingh J.A. Yu S. Chen L. et al.

Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: Future projections to 2020-2040 using the national inpatient sample.

J Rheumatol. 2019; 46https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.170990View in Article Scopus (310) Crossref Google ScholarSloan M. Premkumar A. Sheth N.P.

Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the u.s., 2014 to 2030.

J Bone Joint Surg - Am. 2018; 100https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01617View in Article Scopus (746) Crossref Google ScholarKayani B. Konan S. Ayuob A. et al.

Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

EFORT Open Rev. 2019; 4: 611-617View in Article Scopus (70) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarScott C.E.H. Oliver W.M. MacDonald D. et al.

Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty in patients under 55 years of age.

Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B: 1625-1634View in Article Scopus (95) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarBoonen B. Schotanus M.G.M. Kerens B. et al.

No difference in clinical outcome between patient-matched positioning guides and conventional instrumented total knee arthroplasty two years post-operatively.

Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B: 939-944View in Article Scopus (27) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarVince K.

Mid-flexion instability after total knee arthroplasty.

Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B: 84-88View in Article Crossref Google ScholarPark S.E. Lee C.T.

Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation of a primary total knee arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22: 1054-1059View in Article Scopus (119) PubMed Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google ScholarBellemans J. Vandenneucker H. Vanlauwe J.

Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res. 2007; 464: 111-116View in Article Scopus (114) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarHampp E. Chughtai M. Scholl L. et al.

Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated greater accuracy and precision to plan compared with manual techniques.

J Knee Surg. 2019; 32: 239-250https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641729View in Article Scopus (113) Crossref Google ScholarMooney J.A. Bala A. Denduluri S.K. et al.

Use of navigation-enhanced instrumentation to mitigate surgical outliers during total knee arthroplasty.

Orthopedics. 2020; 44https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20201012-01View in Article Scopus (2) Crossref Google ScholarDalton D.M. Burke T.P. Kelly E.G. et al.

Quantitative analysis of technological innovation in knee arthroplasty. using patent and publication metrics to identify developments and trends.

J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.031View in Article Scopus (12) Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google ScholarSiddiqi A. Horan T. Molloy R.M. et al.

A clinical review of robotic navigation in total knee arthroplasty: historical systems to modern design.

EFORT Open Rev. 2021; 6: 252-269View in Article Scopus (6) Crossref Google ScholarKayani B. Haddad F.S.

Robotic total knee arthroplasty.

Bone Joint Res. 2019; 8: 438-442View in Article Scopus (34) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarWu M. Charalambous L. Penrose C. et al.

Imageless Robotic Knee Arthroplasty.

Oper Tech Orthopaedics. 2021; 31: 100906View in Article Scopus (0) Crossref Google ScholarHan S. Rodriguez-Quintana D. Freedhand A.M. et al.

Contemporary Robotic Systems in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Orthop Clin North America. 2021; 52: 83-92View in Article Scopus (2) PubMed Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google ScholarLeelasestaporn C. Tarnpichprasert T. Arirachakaran A. et al.

Comparison of 1-year outcomes between MAKO versus NAVIO robot-assisted medial UKA: nonrandomized, prospective, comparative study.

Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020; 32: 13View in Article Scopus (7) Crossref Google ScholarBattenberg A.K. Netravali N.A. Lonner J.H.

A novel handheld robotic-assisted system for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: surgical technique and early survivorship.

J Robotic Surg. 2020; 14https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-00907-wView in Article Scopus (23) Crossref Google ScholarLonner J.H. John T.K. Conditt M.A.

Robotic Arm-assisted UKA Improves Tibial Component Alignment: A Pilot Study.

Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res. 2010; 468: 141-146View in Article Scopus (142) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarShah S.M.

After 25 years of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty, where do we stand today?.

Arthroplasty. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-021-00100-9View in Article Scopus (3) Crossref Google ScholarJaramaz B. Mitra R. Nikou C. et al.Technique and accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for knee arthroplasty in Bi-cruciate retaining total knee replacement. 2. 2018View in Article Google ScholarCasper M. Mitra R. Khare R. et al.

Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for Total Knee Arthroplasty in a cadaveric study.

Computer Assisted Surg. 2018; 23https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2018.1519038View in Article Scopus (30) Crossref Google ScholarBollars P. Boeckxstaens A. Mievis J. et al.

Preliminary experience with an image-free handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty: 77 cases compared with a matched control group.

Eur J Orthopaedic Surg Traumatol. 2020; 30https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02624-3View in Article Scopus (27) Crossref Google ScholarLaddha M. Gaurav S.

Assessment of limb alignment and component placement after all burr robotic-assisted TKA.

Indian J Orthopaedics. 2021; 55: 69-75View in Article Scopus (1) Crossref Google ScholarHowell S.M. Kuznik K. Hull M.L. et al.

Longitudinal shapes of the tibia and femur are unrelated and variable.

Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res. 2010; 468: 1142-1148View in Article Scopus (40) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarKaplan E.L. Meier P.

Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations.

J Am Stat Assoc. 1958; 53https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452View in Article Scopus (48008) Crossref Google ScholarJones C.W. Jerabek S.A.

Current role of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: 1989-1993View in Article Scopus (88) Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google ScholarClement N.D. Al-Zibari M. Afzal I. et al.

A systematic review of imageless hand-held robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: learning curve, accuracy, functional outcome and survivorship.

EFORT Open Rev. 2020; 5: 319-326View in Article Scopus (4) Crossref Google ScholarSavov P. Tuecking L.-R. Windhagen H. et al.

Imageless robotic handpiece-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a learning curve analysis of surgical time and alignment accuracy.

Arch Orthopaedic Trauma Surg. 2021; 141: 2119-2128View in Article Scopus (9) Crossref Google ScholarRivière C. Iranpour F. Auvinet E. et al.

Alignment options for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Orthopaedics Traumatol Surg Res. 2017; 103: 1047-1056View in Article Scopus (157) PubMed Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google ScholarGordon A.C. Conditt M.A. Verstraete M.A.

Achieving a Balanced Knee in Robotic TKA.

Sensors. 2021; 21: 535View in Article Scopus (6) Crossref Google ScholarRoussot M.A. Vles G.F. Oussedik S.

Clinical outcomes of kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

EFORT Open Rev. 2020;