Remote Patient Monitoring Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

Jayakumar P. Di J. Fu J. et al.

A patient-focused technology-enabled program improves outcomes in primary total hip and knee replacement surgery.

JBJS Open Access. 2: e0023Papas P.V. Kim S.J. Ulcoq S. et al.

The utilization of an internet-based patient portal and its impact on surgical outcomes in the total joint arthroplasty patient population.

Orthop Proc. 100-B: 62Ramkumar P.N. Haeberle H.S. Ramanathan D. et al.

Remote patient monitoring using mobile health for total knee arthroplasty: Validation of a wearable and machine learning–based surveillance platform.

J Arthroplasty. 34: 2253-2259

Kurtz S.M., Higgs G.B., Chen Z., et al., Patient perceptions of wearable and smartphone technologies for remote outcome monitoring in patients who have hip osteoarthritis or arthroplasties, J Arthroplasty, 37 (7), 2022, S488-S492.

Mehta S.J. Hume E. Troxel A.B. et al.

Effect of remote monitoring on discharge to home, return to activity, and rehospitalization after hip and knee arthroplasty.

JAMA Netw Open. 3 ()Rosner B.I. Gottlieb M. Anderson W.N.

Effectiveness of an automated digital remote guidance and telemonitoring platform on costs, readmissions, and complications after hip and knee arthroplasties.

J Arthroplasty. 33Rao S.S. Loeb A.E. Amin R.M. et al.

Establishing telemedicine in an academic total joint arthroplasty practice: Needs and opportunities highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Arthroplasty Today. 6: 617-622Giunta N.M. Paladugu P.S. Bernstein D.N. et al.

Telemedicine hip and knee arthroplasty experience during COVID-19.

J Arthroplasty. ()Chaudhry H. Nadeem S. Mundi R.

How satisfied are patients and surgeons with telemedicine in orthopaedic care during the COVID-19 pandemic? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res. 479: 47-56Tanaka M.J. Oh L.S. Martin S.D. et al.

Telemedicine in the era of COVID-19.

J Bone Joint Surg. 102Campbell K. Louie P. Levine B. et al.

Using patient engagement platforms in the postoperative management of patients.

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 13: 479-484Holte A.J. Molloy I.B. Werth P.M. et al.

Do patient engagement platforms in total joint arthroplasty improve patient-reported outcomes?.

J Arthroplasty. 36: 3850-3858Andrawis J. Akhavan S. Chan V. et al.

Higher preoperative patient activation associated with better patient-reported outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.

Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res. 473: 2688-2697Knapp P.W. Keller R.A. Mabee K.A. et al.

Quantifying patient engagement in total joint Arthroplasty using Digital Application-based technology.

J Arthroplasty. 36: 3108-3117Maempel J.F. Clement N.D. Ballantyne J.A. et al.

Enhanced recovery programmes after total hip arthroplasty can result in reduced length of hospital stay without compromising functional outcome.

Bone Joint J. 98-b: 475Bitsaki M. Koutras G. Heep H. et al.

Cost-effective mobile-based health care system for managing total joint arthroplasty follow-up.

Healthc Inform Res. 23: 67Koutras C. Bitsaki M. Koutras G. et al.

Socioeconomic impact of e-Health services in major joint replacement: a scoping review.

Technol Health Care. 23: 809Lyman S. Hidaka C. Fields K. et al.

Monitoring patient recovery after Tha or TKA using Mobile Technology.

HSS J. 16: 358-365Toogood P.A. Abdel M.P. Spear J.A. et al.

The monitoring of activity at home after total hip arthroplasty.

Bone Joint J. 98-B: 1450-1454Bahadori S. Immins T. Wainwright T.W.

A review of wearable motion tracking systems used in rehabilitation following hip and knee replacement.

J Rehabil Assistive Tech Eng. 5 ()Patterson J.T. Wu H.-H. Chung C.C. et al.

Wearable activity sensors and early pain after total joint arthroplasty.

Arthroplasty Today. 6: 68-70Goel R. Danoff J.R. Petrera M. et al.

A step in the right direction: Body location determines activity tracking device accuracy in total knee and hip arthroplasty patients.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 28Shah R.F. Zaid M.B. Bendich I. et al.

Optimal sampling frequency for wearable sensor data in Arthroplasty Outcomes Research. A prospective observational cohort trial.

J Arthroplasty. 34: 2248-2252Bini S.A. Shah R.F. Bendich I. et al.

Machine learning algorithms can use wearable sensor data to accurately predict six-week patient-reported outcome scores following joint replacement in a prospective trial.

J Arthroplasty. 34: 2242-2247Jourdan T. Debs N. Frindel C.

The contribution of machine learning in the validation of commercial wearable sensors for gait monitoring in patients: A systematic review.

Sensors. 21: 4808Bolam S.M. Batinica B. Yeung T.C. et al.

Remote patient monitoring with wearable sensors following knee arthroplasty.

Sensors. 21: 5143Bell K.M. Onyeukwu C. Smith C.N. et al.

A portable system for remote rehabilitation following a total knee replacement: a pilot randomized controlled clinical study.

Sensors. 20: 6118

ROMTech. Romtech and the PortableConnect help patients with advanced telemedicine technology. GlobeNewswire News Room.

() ()Bergmann J. Chandaria V. McGregor A.

Wearable and implantable sensors: The patient’s perspective.

Sensors. 12: 16695-16709Cushner F.D. Schiller P.J. Mueller J.K. et al.

A cadaveric study addressing the feasibility of remote patient monitoring prosthesis for total knee arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty. 37Silverio-Fernández M. Renukappa S. Suresh S.

What is a smart device? - a conceptualisation within the paradigm of the internet of things.

Visualization Eng. 6Ledet E.H. DʼLima D. Westerhoff P. et al.

Implantable sensor technology: From Research to Clinical Practice.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 20: 383-392Halder A. Kutzner I. Graichen F. et al.

Influence of limb alignment on mediolateral loading in total knee replacement.

J Bone Joint Surg. 94: 1023-1029Kutzner I. Bender A. Dymke J. et al.

Mediolateral force distribution at the knee joint shifts across activities and is driven by tibiofemoral alignment.

Bone Joint J. 99-B: 779-787D'Lima D.D. Patil S. Steklov N. et al.

Tibial forces measured in vivo after total knee arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty. 21: 255-262Ledet E.H. Liddle B. Kradinova K. et al.

Smart implants in orthopedic surgery, improving patient outcomes: A Review.

Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Health. 5: 41-51Iyengar K.P. Gowers B.T. Jain V.K. et al.

Smart sensor implant technology in total knee arthroplasty.

J Clin Orthopaedics Trauma. 22: 101605

4 remote patient monitoring reimbursement tips for your practice. Top Business Software Resources for Buyers - 2022 | Software Advice.

() ()

2022 Medicare CPT code reimbursements for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM). Signallamp Health.

() ()

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif