No compliment for complement: Kidney biopsies of patients with malignant nephrosclerosis show no complement activation

Abstract

The complement system represents an ancient part of innate immunity and is comprised of multiple serum proteins. In several pathological conditions, including atypical hemolytic syndrome (aHUS), complement activation is contributing to disease progression. Therefore, pharmacological targeting of complement is a viable therapeutic strategy in this population. Recent data suggest complement activation in patients suffering from malignant hypertension and stenosing arteriosclerosis also called malignant nephrosclerosis (MNS). Since MNS and aHUS also share histopathological similarities therapeutic complement inhibition became a discussion in MNS. To eliminate the pitfall of confusing complement trapping with activation in the kidney we used the proximity ligation assay to detect, visualize and quantify assembled complement convertases of the different pathways in renal tissue diagnosed with MNS or aHUS. We compared them to a control group of patients presenting with thin basement membrane syndrome (TBMD). Activation of the alternative and the classical pathways were examined by glomerular and vascular quantification of C3b/Bb and C4b/C2b, respectively. We found an overactivation of the alternative pathway only in patients suffering from aHUS, while complement activation was not altered in MNS when compared with TBMD. Thus our results cannot contribute to the hypothesis that complement inhibition may be an efficient therapeutic strategy for patients presenting end-organ damage due to stenosing arteriosclerosis. The use of complement inhibition in these patients cannot be recommended.

Competing Interest Statement

TS received fees from Alexion and Novartis. This support did not influence the research work or the content of this manuscript.

Funding Statement

German Research Foundation

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by the local ethics committees at Hamburg (Ethics commission Hamburg, WF 011/15).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif