1. Sales P-H, , Gomes M-V, , Oliveira-Neto O-B, , de Lima F-J, , Leão J-C. Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding the effectiveness of zygomatic implants: an overview of systematic reviews. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2020; 25: e541–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23569

2. Stokholm R, , Spin-Neto R, , Nyengaard JR, , Isidor F. Comparison of radiographic and histological assessment of peri-implant bone around oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 782–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12683

3. Greenfield, EJ. Implantation of artificial crown and bridge abutments. Dent Cosmos 1913; 55: 364.

4. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003; 67: 932–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x

5. Puleo DA, , Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 2311–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00160-x

6. Donath K, , Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The säge-schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 318–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00172.x

7. Isidor F. Clinical probing and radiographic assessment in relation to the histologic bone level at oral implants in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 255–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080402.x

8. Fritz ME, , Jeffcoat MK, , Reddy M, , Koth D, , Braswell LD, , Malmquist J, , et al.. Implants in regenerated bone in a primate model. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 703–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.6.703

9. Ritter L, , Elger MC, , Rothamel D, , Fienitz T, , Zinser M, , Schwarz F, , et al.. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43(6): 20130088. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20130088

10. Hausmann E. Radiographic and digital imaging in periodontal practice. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 497–503. doi: https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.3.497

11. Corpas L dos S, , Jacobs R, , Quirynen M, , Huang Y, , Naert I, , Duyck J. Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomography analyses to the histological standard. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 492–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02029.x

12. Bernaerts A, , Barbier L, , Abeloos J, , De Backer T, , Bosmans F, , Vanhoenacker FM, , et al.. Cone beam computed tomography imaging in dental implants: a primer for clinical radiologists. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2020; 24: 499–509. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701496

13. Antila K, , Lilja M, , Kalke M. Segmentation of facial bone surfaces by patch growing from cone beam CT volumes. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45(8): 20150435. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150435

14. Vanderstuyft T, , Tarce M, , Sanaan B, , Jacobs R, , de Faria Vasconcelos K, , Quirynen M. Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: an ex-vivo study. J Clin Periodontol 2019; 46: 1134–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13183

15. Balshi TJ, , Wolfinger GJ, , Shuscavage NJ, , Balshi SF. Zygomatic bone-to-implant contact in 77 patients with partially or completely edentulous maxillas. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70: 2065–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.05.016

16. Wang F, , Bornstein MM, , Hung K, , Fan S, , Chen X, , Huang W, , et al.. Application of real-time surgical navigation for Zygomatic implant insertion in patients with severely atrophic maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76: 80–87: S0278-2391(17)31144-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.021

17. Lorensen WE, , Cline HE. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. SIGGRAPH Comput Graph 1987; 21: 163–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/37402.37422

18. Schroeder W, , Martin K, , Lorensen B. The visualization toolkit. Kitware, ISBN 978-1-930934-19-1 2006.

19. Pena N, , Campos PSF, , de Almeida SM, , Bóscolo FN. Determination of the length of zygomatic implants through computed tomography: establishing a protocol. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 453–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/16676031

20. Al-Nawas B, , Wagner W. 7.19 Materials in Dental Implantology. In: Ducheyne P, ed. Comprehensive Biomaterials II. Elsevier; 2017., : ages

21. Aparicio C, , Manresa C, , Francisco K, , Ouazzani W, , Claros P, , Potau JM, , et al.. The long-term use of zygomatic implants: a 10-year clinical and radiographic report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014; 16: 447–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12007

22. Aparicio C, , Manresa C, , Francisco K, , Aparicio A, , Nunes J, , Claros P, , et al.. Zygomatic implants placed using the Zygomatic anatomy-guided approach versus the classical technique: a proposed system to report rhinosinusitis diagnosis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014; 16: 627–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12047

23. Pu L-F, , Tang C-B, , Shi W-B, , Wang D-M, , Wang Y-Q, , Sun C, , et al.. Age-related changes in anatomic bases for the insertion of zygomatic implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 43: 1367–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.05.007

24. Lombardo G, , D’Agostino A, , Trevisiol L, , Romanelli MG, , Mascellaro A, , Gomez-Lira M, , et al.. Clinical, microbiologic and radiologic assessment of soft and hard tissues surrounding zygomatic implants: a retrospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 122: 537–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.06.011

25. Hung KF, , Ai QY, , Fan SC, , Wang F, , Huang W, , Wu YQ. Measurement of the Zygomatic region for the optimal placement of quad Zygomatic implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017; 19: 841–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12524

26. Huang TY, , Hsia YJ, , Sung MY, , Wu YT, , Hsu PC. Three-dimensional measurement of radiographic bone-implant contact lengths of zygomatic implants in zygomatic bone: a retrospective study of 66 implants in 28 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 50: 1100–1106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.004

27. Bertos Quílez J, , Guijarro-Martínez R, , Aboul-Hosn Centenero S, , Hernández-Alfaro F. Virtual quad zygoma implant placement using cone beam computed tomography: sufficiency of malar bone volume, intraosseous implant length, and relationship to the sinus according to the degree of alveolar bone atrophy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 47: 252–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.07.004

28. Stoppie N, , van der Waerden J-P, , Jansen JA, , Duyck J, , Wevers M, , Naert IE. Validation of microfocus computed tomography in the evaluation of bone implant specimens. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7: 87–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00051.x

29. Hsu J-T, , Wu AY-J, , Fuh L-J, , Huang H-L. Effects of implant length and 3D bone-to-implant contact on initial stabilities of dental implant: a microcomputed tomography study. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17(1): 132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0422-1