American Journal of Nephrology
Patient-Oriented, Translational Research: Research Article
Goraya N. · Madias N.E. · Mamun A. · Simoni J. · Wesson D.E.Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price. Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more Select* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.
Article / Publication Details AbstractIntroduction: Like metabolic acidosis, earlier stages of acid (H+) stress, including an ongoing H+ challenge in the form of dietary H+, without or with steady-state H+ accumulation but with normal plasma total CO2 (PTCO2) (the latter state known as eubicarbonatemic acidosis), are associated with augmented progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) but diagnosis of this covert H+ stress is clinically problematic. Prior published studies to identify clinically practical biomarkers of covert H+ stress did not include assessments of either dietary H+ or H+ retention. Methods: We tested plasma pH (PpH), 8-hour urine excretion of citrate (UcitV) or ammonium (UNH4+V) as biomarkers of dietary H+ assessed as potential renal acid load (PRAL) and of steady-state H+ retention by comparing observed to expected PTCO2 increase two hours after an oral NaHCO3 bolus. We recruited 313 non-diabetic participants with PTCO2 ≥ 22 mM to exclude participants with metabolic acidosis and with eGFR [mean (SD), ml/min/1.73 m2] stages G1 [n=62, 99.2 (7.3)], G2 [n=167, 73.8 (6.3)], and G3 [n=84, 39.9 (6.7)]. We performed linear regressions (LR) between H+ retention or PRAL (dependent variables) and PpH, UcitV or UNH4+V (independent variables) after adjusting for eGFR. Results: Steady-state H+ retention [mean (SD), mmol] increased with stage [G1=3.8 (12.5), G2=18.2 (12.4), and G3=25.6 (9.0)]. PpH was not significantly associated with PRAL in any group and its association with H+ retention was significant only for G3 (p
S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
留言 (0)