Nakatogawa, H. Mechanisms governing autophagosome biogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 439–458 (2020).
Schuck, S. Microautophagy — distinct molecular mechanisms handle cargoes of many sizes. J. Cell Sci. 133, jcs246322 (2020).
Mizushima, N. & Komatsu, M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell 147, 728–741 (2011).
Levine, B. & Kroemer, G. Biological functions of autophagy genes: a disease perspective. Cell 176, 11–42 (2019).
Mejlvang, J. et al. Starvation induces rapid degradation of selective autophagy receptors by endosomal microautophagy. J. Cell Biol. 217, 3640–3655 (2018).
Müller, M. et al. The coordinated action of the MVB pathway and autophagy ensures cell survival during starvation. eLife 4, e07736 (2015).
Lynch-Day, M. A. & Klionsky, D. J. The Cvt pathway as a model for selective autophagy. FEBS Lett. 584, 1359–1366 (2010).
Liu, X. M. et al. ESCRTs cooperate with a selective autophagy receptor to mediate vacuolar targeting of soluble cargos. Mol. Cell 59, 1035–1042 (2015).
Leidal, A. M. & Debnath, J. Emerging roles for the autophagy machinery in extracellular vesicle biogenesis and secretion. FASEB Bioadv. 3, 377–386 (2021).
Mizushima, N. & Levine, B. Autophagy in human diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 1564–1576 (2020).
Kaushik, S. & Cuervo, A. M. The coming of age of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 365–381 (2018).
Fujioka, Y. et al. Structural basis of starvation-induced assembly of the autophagy initiation complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 513–521 (2014).
Yamamoto, H. et al. The intrinsically disordered protein Atg13 mediates supramolecular assembly of autophagy initiation complexes. Dev. Cell 38, 86–99 (2016).
Fujioka, Y. et al. Phase separation organizes the site of autophagosome formation. Nature 578, 301–305 (2020). This paper reports liquid–liquid phase separation of the Atg1 complex that initiates autophagosome formation in yeast.
Turco, E. et al. FIP200 claw domain binding to p62 promotes autophagosome formation at ubiquitin condensates. Mol. Cell 74, 330–346.e311 (2019).
Vargas, J. N. S. et al. Spatiotemporal control of ULK1 activation by NDP52 and TBK1 during selective autophagy. Mol. Cell 74, 347–362.e346 (2019).
Ravenhill, B. J. et al. The cargo receptor NDP52 initiates selective autophagy by recruiting the ULK complex to cytosol-invading bacteria. Mol. Cell 74, 320–329.e326 (2019). The 2019 papers by Turco et al., Vargas et al. and Ravenhill et al. report the recruitment of the ULK complex by selective autophagy adaptors.
Turco, E. et al. Reconstitution defines the roles of p62, NBR1 and TAX1BP1 in ubiquitin condensate formation and autophagy initiation. Nat. Commun. 12, 5212 (2021).
Smith, M. D. et al. CCPG1 is a non-canonical autophagy cargo receptor essential for ER-phagy and pancreatic ER proteostasis. Dev. Cell 44, 217–232 (2018).
Zhou, Z. et al. Phosphorylation regulates the binding of autophagy receptors to FIP200 Claw domain for selective autophagy initiation. Nat. Commun. 12, 1570 (2021).
Sawa-Makarska, J. et al. Reconstitution of autophagosome nucleation defines Atg9 vesicles as seeds for membrane formation. Science 369, eaaz7714 (2020).
Ren, X. et al. Structural basis for ATG9A recruitment to the ULK1 complex in mitophagy initiation. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.12.499634 (2022).
Yamano, K. et al. Critical role of mitochondrial ubiquitination and the OPTN–ATG9A axis in mitophagy. J. Cell Biol. 219, e201912144 (2020).
Coudevylle, N. et al. Mechanism of Atg9 recruitment by Atg11 in the cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 101573 (2022).
Baskaran, S. et al. Architecture and dynamics of the autophagic phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex. eLife 3, e05115 (2014).
Hurley, J. H. & Young, L. N. Mechanisms of autophagy initiation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 225–244 (2017).
Zheng, J. X. et al. Architecture of the ATG2B-WDR45 complex and an aromatic Y/HF motif crucial for complex formation. Autophagy 13, 1870–1883 (2017).
Chowdhury, S. et al. Insights into autophagosome biogenesis from structural and biochemical analyses of the ATG2A–WIPI4 complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E9792–E9801 (2018).
Maeda, S., Otomo, C. & Otomo, T. The autophagic membrane tether ATG2A transfers lipids between membranes. eLife 8, e45777 (2019).
Osawa, T. et al. Atg2 mediates direct lipid transfer between membranes for autophagosome formation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 281–288 (2019).
Valverde, D. P. et al. ATG2 transports lipids to promote autophagosome biogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 218, 1787–1798 (2019). The 2019 papers by Maeda et al., Osawa et al. and Valverde et al. report that mammalian ATG2A and yeast Atg2 have lipid transfer activity.
Ren, J. et al. Multi-site-mediated entwining of the linear WIR-motif around WIPI β-propellers for autophagy. Nat. Commun. 11, 2702 (2020).
Dooley, H. C. et al. WIPI2 links LC3 conjugation with PI3P, autophagosome formation, and pathogen clearance by recruiting Atg12-5-16L1. Mol. Cell 55, 238–252 (2014).
Bakula, D. et al. WIPI3 and WIPI4 beta-propellers are scaffolds for LKB1–AMPK–TSC signalling circuits in the control of autophagy. Nat. Commun. 8, 15637 (2017).
Bozic, M. et al. A conserved ATG2–GABARAP family interaction is critical for phagophore formation. EMBO Rep. 21, e201948412 (2020).
Maeda, S. et al. Structure, lipid scrambling activity and role in autophagosome formation of ATG9A. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 1194–1201 (2020).
Matoba, K. et al. Atg9 is a lipid scramblase that mediates autophagosomal membrane expansion. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 1185–1193 (2020). The 2020 papers by Maeda et al. and Matoba et al. demonstrate that mammalian ATG9A and yeast Atg9 have lipid scramblase activity.
Ghanbarpour, A., Valverde, D. P., Melia, T. J. & Reinisch, K. M. A model for a partnership of lipid transfer proteins and scramblases in membrane expansion and organelle biogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2101562118 (2021).
Li, Y. E. et al. TMEM41B and VMP1 are scramblases and regulate the distribution of cholesterol and phosphatidylserine. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202103105 (2021).
Huang, D. et al. TMEM41B acts as an ER scramblase required for lipoprotein biogenesis and lipid homeostasis. Cell Metab. 33, 1655–1670.e1658 (2021). The 2021 papers by Ghanbarpour et al., Li et al. and Huang et al. demonstrate that the ER membrane proteins TMEM41B and VMP1 have lipid scramblase activity.
Okawa, F. et al. Evolution and insights into the structure and function of the DedA superfamily containing TMEM41B and VMP1. J. Cell Sci. 134, jcs255877 (2021).
Mesdaghi, S., Murphy, D. L., Sanchez Rodriguez, F., Burgos-Marmol, J. J. & Rigden, D. J. In silico prediction of structure and function for a large family of transmembrane proteins that includes human Tmem41b. F1000Res 9, 1395 (2020).
Hama, Y., Morishita, H. & Mizushima, N. Regulation of ER-derived membrane dynamics by the DedA domain-containing proteins VMP1 and TMEM41B. EMBO Rep. 23, e53894 (2022).
Fujita, N. et al. An Atg4B mutant hampers the lipidation of LC3 paralogues and causes defects in autophagosome closure. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 4651–4659 (2008).
Sou, Y. S. et al. The Atg8 conjugation system is indispensable for proper development of autophagic isolation membranes in mice. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 4762–4775 (2008).
Uemura, T. et al. A cluster of thin tubular structures mediates transformation of the ER to autophagic isolation membrane. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34, 1695–1706 (2014).
Tsuboyama, K. et al. The ATG conjugation systems are important for degradation of the inner autophagosomal membrane. Science 354, 1036–1041 (2016).
留言 (0)