Audiology Research, Vol. 13, Pages 23-31: Comparison of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Tinnitus Functional Index as Treatment Outcomes

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants in this study.

Audiolres 13 00003 g001

Figure 2. Average HL curves of the participants with normal hearing (NH).

Audiolres 13 00003 g002

Figure 3. Average HL curves of the hearing impaired (HI) participants.

Audiolres 13 00003 g003

Figure 4. (a) Scatter plot and (b) empirical cumulative distribution functions of baseline THI and TFI scores.

Audiolres 13 00003 g004

Figure 5. (a) Tinnitus severity reduction following the four-month treatment and (b) result of the application of the ANOVA test.

Audiolres 13 00003 g005

Figure 6. (THI, TFI) pair values at baseline (circles, blue) and after EAE treatment (diamonds, green) and their corresponding fitted lines.

Audiolres 13 00003 g006

Table 1. Tinnitus characteristics of participants.

Table 1. Tinnitus characteristics of participants.

Duration (Months)SoundLocationPossible AetiologyMean = 83
SD = 108Hissing (9)Bilateral (10)Emotional disorders (9)Ringing (8)Left ear (8)Hearing loss (7)Tonal (5)Right ear (4)Conductive troubles (7)Mean = 5680 Hz Teeth extraction (2)SD = 2810 Hz Noise trauma (1)

Table 2. Categories of tinnitus.

Table 2. Categories of tinnitus.

THI [21]TFI [18]CategoryTHI RangeTFI Range CategorySlight0–160–17Not a problemMild18–3718–31Small problemModerate38–5632–53Moderate problemSevere58–7657–72Big problemCatastrophic78–10073–100Very big problem

Table 3. Linear regression parameters of TFI versus THI at pre- and post-treatment.

Table 3. Linear regression parameters of TFI versus THI at pre- and post-treatment.

rmbRegression LinePre-EAE0.740.5925TFI = 0.59 THI + 25Post-EAE0.780.887.6TFI = 0.88 THI + 7.6

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif