Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error in the author’s name of Sophie Lecouturier. The correct author’s name is provided in this correction.
An error was identified in the following section,
Abstract:
… No difference was found at week 3, 6, and 8 …
This should be … No difference was found at week 4, 6, and 8 …
Methods:
… collagen I/III porcine derived membrane (Cartmaix, Matricel GmbH, Herzogenrath, Germany) …
This should be … collagen I/III porcine derived membrane (Cartimaix, Matricel GmbH, Herzogenrath, Germany)
… the membranes of a density per membrane of approximately 100,000 MSCs per cm2 …
This should be … the membranes of a density per membrane of approximately 100,000 chondrocytes per cm2
Afterwards, the membranes were dehydrated in an ascending alcohol series (5 min per cuvette) as follow: xylene (3×), 100% ethanol (2×), 96% ethanol, 80% ethanol, 70% ethanol, aqua dest. Subsequently the membranes were …
This should be … Afterwards, the membranes were dehydrated in a descending alcohol series. Subsequently the membranes were
Results:
… No difference was found at week 3, 6, and 8 …
This should be … No difference was found at week 4, 6, and 8 …
Figures 1, 2, 3 are wrong. We provide the corrected Figures 1, 2 and 3
Fig. 1Experimental set-up (N = 72)
Fig. 2Chondrocytes migration within the membrane
Fig. 3Chondrocytes proliferation within the membrane
留言 (0)