Risk for and consequences of endometriosis: A critical epidemiologic review.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 51: 1-15View in Article Google ScholarJha P. Sakala M. Chamie L.P. et al.Endometriosis MRI lexicon: consensus statement from the society of abdominal radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020; 45: 1552-1568View in Article Google ScholarTong A. VanBuren W.M. Chamié L. et al.Recommendations for MRI technique in the evaluation of pelvic endometriosis: consensus statement from the Society of Abdominal Radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel.
Abdom Radiol. 2020; 45: 1569-1586View in Article Google ScholarBrown M.A. Mattrey R.F. Stamato S. et al.MRI of the female pelvis using vaginal gel.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185: 1221-1227View in Article Google ScholarChassang M. Novellas S. Bloch-Marcotte C. et al.Utility of vaginal and rectal contrast medium in MRI for the detection of deep pelvic endometriosis.
Eur Radiol. 2010; 20: 1003-1010View in Article Google ScholarBazot M. Bharwani N. Huchon C. et al.European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis.
Eur Radiol. 2017; 27: 2765-2775View in Article Google ScholarBazot M. Gasner A. Ballester M. et al.Value of thin-section oblique axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images to assess uterosacral ligament endometriosis.
Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 346-353View in Article Google ScholarTaylor E.C. Irshaid L. Mathur M.Multimodality Imaging Approach to Ovarian Neoplasms with Pathologic Correlation.
RadioGraphics. 2021; 41: 289-315View in Article Google ScholarSakala M.D. Shampain K.L. Wasnik A.P.Advances in MR Imaging of the Female Pelvis.
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2020; 28: 415-431View in Article Google ScholarKim H.J. Lee S.Y. Shin Y.R. et al.The Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.
PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0149465View in Article Google ScholarTakeuchi M. Matsuzaki K. Nishitani H.Susceptibility-Weighted MRI of Endometrioma: Preliminary Results.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191: 1366-1370View in Article Google ScholarSiegelman E.S. Oliver E.R.MR Imaging of Endometriosis: Ten Imaging Pearls.
RadioGraphics. 2012; 32: 1675-1691View in Article Google ScholarExacoustos C. De Felice G. Pizzo A. et al.Isolated Ovarian Endometrioma: A History Between Myth and Reality.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 25: 884-891View in Article Google ScholarCorwin M.T. Gerscovich E.O. Lamba R. et al.Differentiation of Ovarian Endometriomas from Hemorrhagic Cysts at MR Imaging: Utility of the T2 Dark Spot Sign.
Radiology. 2014; 271: 126-132View in Article Google ScholarKanso H.N. Hachem K. Aoun N.J. et al.Variable MR findings in ovarian functional hemorrhagic cysts.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 24: 356-361View in Article Google ScholarAllen B.C. Hosseinzadeh K. Qasem S.A. et al.Practical Approach to MRI of Female Pelvic Masses.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202: 1366-1375View in Article Google ScholarZhao S.H. Qiang J.W. Zhang G.F. et al.MRI in differentiating ovarian borderline from benign mucinous cystadenoma: Pathological correlation.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 39: 162-166View in Article Google ScholarLaurent P.E. Thomassin-Piana J. Jalaguier-Coudray A.Mucin-producing tumors of the ovary: MR imaging appearance.
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015; 96: 1125-1132View in Article Google ScholarPeyrot H. Montoriol P.F. Canis M.Spontaneous T1-Hyperintensity Within an Ovarian Lesion: Spectrum of Diagnoses.
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2015; 66: 115-120View in Article Google ScholarSolak A. Sahin N. Genç B. et al.Diagnostic value of susceptibility-weighted imaging of abdominal wall endometriomas during the cyclic menstrual changes: a preliminary study.
Eur J Radiol. 2013; 82 (e411–416)View in Article Google ScholarRedwine D.B.Ovarian endometriosis: a marker for more extensive pelvic and intestinal disease.
Fertil Steril. 1999; 72: 310-315View in Article Google ScholarWilliams J.C. Burnett T.L. Jones T. et al.Association between kissing and retropositioned ovaries and severity of endometriosis: MR imaging evaluation.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020; 45: 1637-1644View in Article Google ScholarGhezzi F. Raio L. Cromi A. et al.Kissing ovaries”: a sonographic sign of moderate to severe endometriosis.
Fertil Steril. 2005; 83: 143-147View in Article Google ScholarGougoutas C.A. Siegelman E.S. Hunt J. et al.Pelvic endometriosis: various manifestations and MR imaging findings.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 175: 353-358View in Article Google ScholarRevzin M.V. Moshiri M. Katz D.S. et al.Imaging Evaluation of Fallopian Tubes and Related Disease: A Primer for Radiologists.
Radiographics. 2020; 40: 1473-1501View in Article Google ScholarKim M.Y. Rha S.E. Oh S.N. et al.MR Imaging findings of hydrosalpinx: a comprehensive review.
Radiographics. 2009; 29: 495-507View in Article Google ScholarOutwater E.K. Siegelman E.S. Chiowanich P. et al.Dilated fallopian tubes: MR imaging characteristics.
Radiology. 1998; 208: 463-469View in Article Google ScholarFoti P.V. Ognibene N. Spadola S. et al.Non-neoplastic diseases of the fallopian tube: MR imaging with emphasis on diffusion-weighted imaging.
Insights Imaging. 2016; 7: 311-327View in Article Google ScholarTrehan A. Trehan A.K.Endometrioma contained within the broad ligament.
BMJ Case Rep. 2014; 2014 (bcr2013203441)View in Article Google ScholarNezhat F. Datta M.S. Hanson V. et al.The relationship of endometriosis and ovarian malignancy: a review.
Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: 1559-1570View in Article Google ScholarRobinson K.A. Menias C.O. Chen L. et al.Understanding malignant transformation of endometriosis: imaging features with pathologic correlation.
Abdom Radiol. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01914-7View in Article Google ScholarTanaka Y.O. Yoshizako T. Nishida M. et al.Ovarian carcinoma in patients with endometriosis: MR imaging findings.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 175: 1423-1430View in Article Google ScholarNavarro R. Poder L. Sun D. et al.Endometriosis in pregnancy.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020; 45: 1741-1753View in Article Google ScholarGuerriero S. Ajossa S. Piras S. et al.Serial ultrasonographic evaluation of a decidualized endometrioma in pregnancy.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 26: 304-306View in Article Google ScholarTakeuchi M. Matsuzaki K. Nishitani H.Magnetic resonance manifestations of decidualized endometriomas during pregnancy.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008; 32: 353-355View in Article Google ScholarMascilini F. Moruzzi C. Giansiracusa C. et al.Imaging in gynecological disease. 10: Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of decidualized endometriomas surgically removed during pregnancy.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 44: 354-360View in Article Google ScholarFrühauf F. Fanta M. Burgetová A. et al.Endometriosis in pregnancy - diagnostics and management.
Ceska Gynekol. 2019; 84: 61-67View in Article Google ScholarMiyakoshi K. Tanaka M. Gabionza D. et al.Decidualized ovarian endometriosis mimicking malignancy.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 171: 1625-1626View in Article Google ScholarTakeuchi M. Matsuzaki K. Harada M.Computed diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating decidualized endometrioma from ovarian cancer.
Eur J Radiol. 2016; 85: 1016-1019View in Article Google ScholarLier M.C.I. Malik R.F. Ket J.C.F. et al.Spontaneous hemoperitoneum in pregnancy (SHiP) and endometriosis - A systematic review of the recent literature.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 219: 57-65View in Article Google ScholarFeld Z. Rowen T. Callen A. et al.Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm in the setting of deep endometriosis: an uncommon cause of hemoperitoneum in pregnancy.
Emerg Radiol. 2018; 25: 107-110View in Article Google Scholar
留言 (0)