Emerging Technologies in the Wound Management Field

The history of wound care.

J Am Coll Certif Wound Spec. 3: 65-66McInnes E. Jammali-Blasi A. Bell-Syer S.E. et al.

Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention. Cochrane Wounds Group.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001735.pub5Kruger E.A. Pires M. Ngann Y. et al.

Comprehensive management of pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury: Current concepts and future trends.

J Spinal Cord Med. 36: 572-585McInnes E. Jammali-Blasi A. Bell-Syer S.E. et al.

Support surfaces for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Wounds Group.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009490.pub2

Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Clinical Practice Guideline for Health-Care Professionals.

J Spinal Cord Med. 24: S40-S101Moysidis T. Niebel W. Bartsch K. et al.

Prevention of pressure ulcer: interaction of body characteristics and different mattresses.

Int Wound J. 8: 578-584

European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: Clinical practice guideline, The International Guideline. Haesler E, ed. EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA. Published online 2019.

Nixon J. Smith I.L. Brown S. et al.

Pressure Relieving Support Surfaces for Pressure Ulcer Prevention (PRESSURE 2): Clinical and Health Economic Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial.

EClinicalMedicine. 14: 42-52Finnegan M.J. Gazzerro L. Finnegan J.O. et al.

Comparing the effectiveness of a specialized alternating air pressure mattress replacement system and an air-fluidized integrated bed in the management of post-operative flap patients: A randomized controlled pilot study.

J Tissue Viability. 17: 2-9Mendoza R.A. Lorusso G.A. Ferrer D.A. et al.

A prospective, randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the fluid immersion simulation system vs an air-fluidised bed system in the acute postoperative management of pressure ulcers: A midpoint study analysis.

Int Wound J. 16: 989-999Marchione F.G. Araújo L.M.Q. Araújo L.V.

Approaches that use software to support the prevention of pressure ulcer: A systematic review.

Int J Med Inf. 84: 725-736Tran J.P. McLaughlin J.M. Li R.T. et al.

Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in the Acute Care Setting: New Innovations and Technologies.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 138: 232S-240SGoetz L.L. Brown G.S. Priebe M.M.

Interface Pressure Characteristics Of Alternating Air Cell Mattresses In Persons With Spinal Cord Injury.

J Spinal Cord Med. 25: 167-173Ooka M. Kemp M.G. McMyn R. et al.

Evaluation of three types of support surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers in patients in a surgical intensive care unit.

J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 22: 271-279Barnett R.I. Shelton F.E.

Measurement of support surface efficacy: pressure.

Adv Wound Care. 10: 21-29

Technology for Pressure Ulcer Prevention.

Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 11: 30-41Shelton F. Barnett R. Meyer E.

Full-body interface pressure testing as a method for performance evaluation of clinical support surfaces.

Appl Ergon. 29: 491-497

Reduced pressure for fewer pressure ulcers: can real-time feedback of interface pressure optimise repositioning in bed?.

Int Wound J. 13: 774-779Behrendt R. Ghaznavi A.M. Mahan M. et al.

Continuous Bedside Pressure Mapping and Rates of Hospital-Associated Pressure Ulcers in a Medical Intensive Care Unit.

Am J Crit Care. 23: 127-133Gammon H.M. Shelton C.B. Siegert C. et al.

Self-turning for pressure injury prevention.

Wound Med. 12: 15-18

Visual Feedback of Continuous Bedside Pressure Mapping to Optimize Effective Patient Repositioning.

Adv Wound Care. 3: 376-382Brienza D.M. Karg P.E. Jo Geyer M. et al.

The relationship between pressure ulcer incidence and buttock-seat cushion interface pressure in at-risk elderly wheelchair users.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 82: 529-533

Pressure mapping in seating: a frequency analysis approach.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 85: 1136-1140Brienza D. Kelsey S. Karg P. et al.

A randomized clinical trial on preventing pressure ulcers with wheelchair seat cushions.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 58: 2308-2314Crane B. Wininger M. Call E.

Orthotic-Style Off-Loading Wheelchair Seat Cushion Reduces Interface Pressure Under Ischial Tuberosities and Sacrococcygeal Regions.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 97: 1872-1879Crivelli N. Cafueri G. Zucchiatti N.

Italian Journal of Prevention, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Medicine.

ijpdtm. 4: 72-80Bowling F.L. King L. Fadavi H. et al.

An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system.

Diabet Med J Br Diabet Assoc. 26: 93-96Jørgensen L.B. Sørensen J.A. Jemec G.B. et al.

Methods to assess area and volume of wounds - a systematic review: Review of methods to assess wound size.

Int Wound J. 13: 540-553

An image processing Tour of College Mathematics.

1st edition. Chapman & Hall, CRC Press, New York, NYLiu C. Fan X. Guo Z. et al.

Wound area measurement with 3D transformation and smartphone images.

BMC Bioinformatics. 20: 724Davis K.E. Constantine F.C. Macaslan E.C. et al.

Validation of a laser-assisted wound measurement device for measuring wound volume.

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 7: 1161-1166Malone M. Schwarzer S. Walsh A. et al.

Monitoring wound progression to healing in diabetic foot ulcers using three-dimensional wound imaging.

J Diabetes Complications. 34: 107471Ruan C.M. Escobedo E. Harrison S. et al.

Magnetic resonance imaging of nonhealing pressure ulcers and myocutaneous flaps.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 79: 1080-1088

The scintigraphic diagnosis of osteomyelitis.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 158: 9-18Faust E. Opoku-Agyeman J.L. Behnam A.B.

Use of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation and Dwell Time: An Overview.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 147: 16S-26S

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Devices With Instillation/Irrigation: A Technologic Analysis.

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 48: 199-202Fletcher J. Mosahebi A. Younis I. et al.

Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation for Category 3 and 4 pressure ulcers: Findings of an advisory board meeting.

Wounds UK. 15: 72-77Gupta S. Gabriel A. Lantis J. et al.

Clinical recommendations and practical guide for negative pressure wound therapy with instillation.

Int Wound J. 13: 159-174

Negative pressure wound therapy and nurse education.

Br J Nurs. 26: S6-S18Halim A. Khoo T. Shah J.Y.

Biologic and synthetic skin substitutes: An overview.

Indian J Plast Surg. 43: 23

Skin substitutes: understanding product differences: choosing the right product can prove critical to patient care--and to staff resources in a busy clinic.

Wound Care Advis. 5: 30+Ennis W.J. Lee C. Gellada K. et al.

Advanced Technologies to Improve Wound Healing: Electrical Stimulation, Vibration Therapy, and Ultrasound-What Is the Evidence?.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 138: 94S-104SdesJardins-Park H.E. Foster D.S. Longaker M.T.

Fibroblasts and wound healing: an update.

Regen Med. 13: 491-495

Effects and mechanisms of a microcurrent dressing on skin wound healing: a review.

Mil Med Res. 1: 24Scalamandré A. Bogie K.M.

Smart technologies in wound prevention and care.

in: Amit Gefen Innovations and Emerging technologies in wound care. Academic Press, : 225-244https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815028-3.00013-4Bogie K.M. Garverick S. Zorman C.A. et al.

Integrated surface stimulation device for wound therapy and infection control.

() ()

Is Ultrasonic Mist Therapy Effective for Debriding Chronic Wounds?.

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 35: 579-583

Nonthermal effects of therapeutic ultrasound: the frequency resonance hypothesis.

J Athl Train. 37: 293-299Wagner-Cox P. Duhame H.M. Jamison C.R. et al.

Use of Noncontact Low-Frequency Ultrasound in Deep Tissue Pressure Injury: A Retrospective Analysis.

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 44: 336-342

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif