Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143(Suppl 2):22–36.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fujiwara H, Yokota H, Monk B, Treilleux I, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Davis A, et al. Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for cervical adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(9 Suppl 3):S96–101.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny LA, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):129–35.

Article  Google Scholar 

Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, Bradley K, Campos SM, Cho KR, et al. Cervical Cancer, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(1):64–84.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Cibula D, Pötter R, Planchamp F, Avall-Lundqvist E, Fischerova D, Haie Meder C, et al. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/ European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patientswith Cervical Cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2018;127(3):404–16.

Article  Google Scholar 

Marth C, Landoni F, Mahner S, Mccormack M, Colombo N. Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl_4):iv72–83.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Manganaro L, Lakhman Y, Bharwani N, Gui B, Gigli S, Vinci V, et al. Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(10):7802–16.

Article  Google Scholar 

Barwick TD, Taylor A, Rockall A. Functional imaging to predict tumor response in locally advanced cervical cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2013;15(6):549–58.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bae JM, Kim CK, Park JJ, Park BK. Can diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging predict tumor recurrence of uterine cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy? Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016;41(8):1604–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Han L, Wang Q, Zhao L. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prognostic Impact of Pretreatment Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Parameters in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated with Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(7):1258.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout RG, Granton P, et al. Radiomics: Extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(4):441–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tomaszewski MR, Gillies RJ. The Biological Meaning of Radiomic Features. Radiology. 2021;298(3):505–16.

Article  Google Scholar 

Reuzé S, Orlhac F, Chargari C, Nioche C, Limkin E, Riet F, et al. Prediction of cervical cancer recurrence using textural features extracted from 18F-FDG PET images acquired with different scanners. Oncotarget. 2017;8(26):43169–79.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ho KC, Fang YH, Chung HW, Yen TC, Ho TY, Chou HH, et al. A preliminary investigation into textural features of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity in (18)F-FDG PET for overall survival prognosis in patients with bulky cervical cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;6(3):166–75.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lucia F, Visvikis D, Desseroit MC, Miranda O, Malhaire JP, Robin P, et al. Prediction of outcome using pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI radiomics in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(5):768–86.

Article  Google Scholar 

Meng J, Liu S, Zhu L, Zhu L, Wang H, Xie L, et al. Texture Analysis as Imaging Biomarker for recurrence in advanced cervical cancer treated with CCRT. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11399.

Article  Google Scholar 

Torheim T, Groendahl AR, Andersen EK, Lyng H, Malinen E, Kvaal K, et al. Cluster analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI reveals tumor subregions related to locoregional relapse for cervical cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 2016;55(11):1294–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Laliscia C, Gadducci A, Mattioni R, Orlandi F, Giusti S, Barcellini A, et al. MRI-based radiomics: promise for locally advanced cervical cancer treated with a tailored integrated therapeutic approach. Tumori. 2021;3008916211014274.

Olawaiye AB, Baker TP, Washington MK, Mutch DG. The new (Version 9) American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, node, metastasis staging for cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(4):287–98.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bourgioti C, Chatoupis K, Moulopoulos. Current imaging strategies for the evaluation of uterine cervical cancer. World. J Radiol. 2016;8(4):342–54.

Google Scholar 

Liu X, Wang J, Hu K, Zhang F, Meng Q, Wang W, et al. Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System of cervical cancer for stage III patients with a cohort from China. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;12:1405–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Matsuo K, Machida H, Mandelbaum RS, Konishi I, Mikami M. Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;152(1):87–93.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ryu JM, Choi YS, Bae JY. Prognostic factors in women with cervical cancer stage IIIC1r treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(7):1165–72.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Tomizawa K, Kaminuma T, Murata K, Noda SE, Irie D, Kumazawa T, et al. FIGO 2018 Staging for Cervical Cancer: Influence on Stage Distribution and Outcomes in the 3D-Image-Guided Brachytherapy Era. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(7):1770.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Mu W, Liang Y, Hall LO, Tan Y, Balagurunathan Y, Wenham R, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT Habitat Radiomics Predicts Outcome of Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated with Chemoradiotherapy. Radiol Artif Intell. 2020;2(6):e190218.

Article  Google Scholar 

O'Connor JP, Rose CJ, Waterton JC, Carano RA, Parker GJ, Jackson A. Imaging intratumor heterogeneity: role in therapy response, resistance, and clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(2):249–57.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures. They Are Data. Radiology. 2016;278(2):563–77.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li Z, Li H, Wang S, Dong D, Yin F, Chen A, et al. MR-Based Radiomics Nomogram of Cervical Cancer in Prediction of the Lymph-Vascular Space Invasion preoperatively. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(5):1420–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wu Q, Wang S, Chen X, Wang Y, Dong L, Liu Z, et al. Radiomics analysis of magnetic resonance imaging improves diagnostic performance of lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2019;138:141–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Becker AS, Ghafoor S, Marcon M, Perucho JA, Wurnig MC, Wagner MW, et al. MRI texture features may predict differentiation and nodal stage of cervical cancer: a pilot study. Acta Radiol Open. 2017;6(10):2058460117729574.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wormald BW, Doran SJ, Ind TE, D'Arcy J, Petts J, deSouza NM. Radiomic features of cervical cancer on T2-and diffusion-weighted MRI: Prognostic value in low-volume tumors suitable for trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;156(1):107–14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fang J, Zhang B, Wang S, Jin Y, Wang F, Ding Y, et al. Association of MRI-derived radiomic biomarker with disease-free survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Theranostics. 2020;10(5):2284–92.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cui Y, Yang X, Shi Z, Yang Z, Du X, Zhao Z, et al. Radiomics analysis of multiparametric MRI for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(3):1211–20.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dappa E, Elger T, Hasenburg A, Düber C, Battista MJ, Hötker AM. The value of advanced MRI techniques in the assessment of cervical cancer: a review. Insights Imaging. 2017;8(5):471–81.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang B, Tian J, Dong D, Gu D, Dong Y, Zhang L, et al. Radiomics features of Multiparametric MRI as novel prognostic factors in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(15):4259–69.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yang F, Young L, Grigsby P. Predictive value of standardizedintratumoral metabolic heterogeneity in locally advanced cervicalcancer treated with chemoradiation. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26(4):777–84.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pinho DF, King B, Xi Y, Albuquerque K, Lea J, Subramaniam RM. Value of Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity and Quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters in Predicting Prognosis for Patients With Cervical Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(4):908–16.

Article  Google Scholar