Symptom burden in glioblastoma - a prospective pilot study from diagnosis to first progression

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing Of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply

Select

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details Abstract

Introduction: The evaluation of symptom burden, performance status and neurological function is still challenging in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Patients may suffer from a wide spectrum of neurological symptoms like cognitive deficits, aphasia or hemiparesis, which interfere to report to comprehensive questionnaires. However, an integrated and reliable neuro-oncological assessment is key in the clinical management and in the evaluation of treatment benefits for GBM patients. Methods: We implemented an easy-to-use clinical toolkit for the prospective assessment and follow-up evaluation of GBM patients using the Karnofsky performance status (KPS), the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIH-SS) and simple scores for the evaluation of key symptoms like fatigue, depression and headache. Results: We prospectively followed 50 patients. The composite score (headache, depression and fatigue), fatigue alone, the NIHSS and the KPS were suitable biomarkers to evaluate symptom burden in GBM patients and indicate clinical disease progression. Discussion/Conclusion: The proposed clinical toolkit seems feasible in routine clinical practice and reflects changes in symptom burden in different stages of the post-surgical course of GBM patients in this monocentric clinical pilot trial.

S. Karger AG, Basel

Article / Publication Details Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif