Why public engagement is important for neuroscientists

Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H. & Uttal, D. H. The development of children’s gender-science stereotypes: a meta-analysis of 5 decades of U.S. draw-a-scientist studies. Child Dev. 89, 1943–1955 (2018).

Article  Google Scholar 

Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H. & Linn, M. C. Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: evidence from 66 nations. J. Educ. Psychol. 107, 631–644 (2015).

Article  Google Scholar 

McGettigan, C. et al. T’ain’t what you say, it’s the way that you say it — left insula and inferior frontal cortex work in interaction with superior temporal regions to control the performance of vocal impersonations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 25, 1875–1886 (2013).

Article  Google Scholar 

Krishnan, S. et al. Beatboxers and guitarists engage sensorimotor regions selectively when listening to the instruments they can play. Cereb. Cortex 28, 4063–4079 (2018).

Article  Google Scholar 

Martinez-Conde, S. Has contemporary academia outgrown the Carl Sagan effect? J. Neurosci. 36, 2077–2082 (2016).

Article  Google Scholar 

Davidson, K. Carl Sagan: a Life (Wiley, 1999).

Royal Society. Factors Affecting Science Communication: a Survey of Scientists and Engineers (The Royal Society, 2006).

Jensen, P., Rouquier, J. B., Kreimer, P. & Croissant, Y. Scientists who engage with society perform better academically. Sci. Public Policy 35, 527–541 (2008).

Article  Google Scholar 

Rödder, S. in The Sciences’ Media Connection — Public Communication and its Repercussions (eds Rödder, S., Franzen, M. & Weingart, P.) 155–177 (Springer, 2012).

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif