Gaussian-Enveloped Tones (GET): a vocoder that can simulate pulsatile stimulation in cochlear implants

Abstract

Acoustic simulations of cochlear implants allow comprehensive evaluation of not only perceptual performance under impoverished listening conditions but also relative contributions of classical spectral and temporal cues to speech recognition. Conventional simulations use continuous sinusoidal or noise carriers, lacking the vital pulsatile characteristics in a typical cochlear-implant processing strategy. The present study employed Gaussian-enveloped tones (GETs) as a discrete carrier to simulate the electric pulse train in modern cochlear implants. Two types of GET vocoders were implemented and evaluated in normal-hearing listeners to compare their performance to actual cochlear-implant performance. In the first implementation, GETs with different durations were used to simulate electric current interaction across channels that produced vowel and consonant recognition similar to the actual cochlear-implant result. In the second implementation, a direct mapping from electric pulses to GETs was developed to simulate a widely-used clinical n-of-m strategy in cochlear implants. The GET processing simulated the actual implant speech in noise perception in terms of the overall trend, the absolute mean scores, and their standard deviations. The present results demonstrated that the pulsatile GET vocoders simulate the cochlear implant performance more accurately than the conventional sinusoid or noise vocoders.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by NIH R01 DC15587 (F.G.Z.), National Natural Science Foundation of China (11704129 and 61771320), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation Grant (2020A1515010386), and Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (202102020944) (Q.M.).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

University of California Irvine Institutional Review Board and Medical Ethics Committee of Shenzhen University gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif