Introduction In contrast to ultrasound technology (US), peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for regional anesthesia was little improved in recent years. When using the combination of both techniques, PNS can give additional information for nerve localization to improve safety and success of regional anesthesia. There are influencing factors on the success rate of stimulation in PNS remaining uninvestigated in a clinical setting to date. This randomized controlled pilot trial evaluates the impact of shape and size of stimulation needles electrodes under dual guidance conditions. Methods In a randomized controlled clinical trial 35 participants undergoing lower limb surgery received a preoperative proximal sciatic nerve block in dual guidance technique. Use of facet needles with point shaped electrodes (N=19, facet group) were compared with tuohy needles with large electroconductive tips (N=16, touhy group). Stimulation success at minimal distance between needle tip and nerve was recorded. Block success and complications of regional anesthesia were assessed. Results In 87% of successful stimulation (20 of 23) an ultrasound-proven contact of needle tip and sciatic nerve was necessary to elicit a motor response. More successful stimulations could performed using facet needles (84%, 16/19) compared to tuohy needles (44%, 7/16, p=0.03). If stimulation was successful the number of successful sensory blockades was increased (78%, 18/23, p=0.02). No serious complications of regional anesthesia were recorded. Discussion This pilot trial suggests that stimulation needles with small electrodes may be more reliable in indicating a contact of needle and nerve, which may improve safety and success of proximal sciatic nerve blocks.

Pajunk GmbH, Geisingen, Deutschland supports a training program at the Charite financially.

NCT03383770

This study did not receive any fundings.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics committee of Campus Charite Mitte gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.