Bari, AS, Woon, CY, Pridgen, B, Chang, J. Overcoming the learning curve; a curriculum-based model for teaching Zone II flexor tendon repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012, 130: 381–8.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Calfee, RP, Boone, S, Stepan, JG, Osei, DA, Thomopoulos, S, Boyer, M. Looped versus single-stranded flexor tendon repairs: a cadaveric mechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 2015, 40: 958–62.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Gan, AWT, Neo, PY, He, M, Yam, AKT, Chong, AKS, Tay, SC. A biomechanical comparison of 3 loop suture materials in a 6-strand flexor tendon repair technique. J Hand Surg Am. 2012, 37: 1830–4.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Gibson, PD, Sobol, GL, Ahmed, IH. Zone II flexor tendon repairs in the United States; trends in current management. J Hand Surg Am. 2016, 42: e99–108.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Giesen, T, Reissner, L, Besmens, I, Politikou, O, Calcagni, M. Flexor tendon repair in the hand with the M-Tang technique (without peripheral sutures), pulley division, and early active motion. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018, 43: 474–9.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Haimovici, L, Papafragkou, S, Lee, W, Dagum, A, Hurst, LC. The impact of fiberwire, fiberloop, and locking suture configuration on flexor tendon repairs. Ann Plast Surg. 2012, 69: 468–70.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Hirpara, KM, Sullivan, PJ, O’Sullivan, ME. The effects of freezing on the tensile properties of repaired porcine flexor tendon. J Hand Surg Am. 2008, 33: 353–8.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Hoenig, JM, Heisey, DM. The abuse of power. Am Stat. 2001, 55: 19–24.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Linnanmäki, L, Göransson, H, Havulinna, J, Karjalainen, T, Leppänen, OV. Factors accounting for variation in the biomechanical properties of flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2018, 43: 1073–80.e2.
Google Scholar | Crossref Lotz, JC, Hariharan, JS, Diao, E. Analytic model to predict the strength of tendon repairs. J Orthop Res. 1998, 16: 399–405.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Sandow, MJ, McMahon, M. Active mobilisation following single cross grasp four-strand flexor tenorrhaphy (Adelaide repair). J Hand Surg Eur. 2011, 36: 467–75.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Schuind, F, Garcia-Elias, M, Cooney, WP, An, KN. Flexor tendon forces: in vivo measurements. J Hand Surg Am. 1992, 17: 291–8.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Tang, JB . Recent evolutions in flexor tendon repairs and rehabilitation. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018, 43: 469–73.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Wong, YR, Lee, CS, Loke, AMK, Liu, X, Jais, ISM, Tay, SC. Comparison of flexor tendon repair between 6-strand Lim-Tsai with 4-strand cruciate and Becker technique. J Hand Surg Am. 2015, 40: 1806–11.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Xie, RG, Zhang, S, Tang, JB, Chen, F. Biomechanical studies of 3 different 6-strand flexor tendon repair techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 2002, 27: 621–7.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Wu, YF, Mao, WF, Tang, JB. The impact of transverse components on 4-strand tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021, 46: 830–5.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Wu, YF, Tang, JB. Recent developments in flexor tendon repair techniques and factors influencing strength of the tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014a, 39: 6–19.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Wu, YF, Tang, JB. The effect of asymmetric core suture purchase on gap resistance of tendon repair in linear cyclic loading. J Hand Surg Am. 2014b, 39: 910–8.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Wu, YF, Tang, JB. The impact of transverse components on resistance and ultimate strength of 6-strand tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021, 46: 836–41.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI