A Detailed Scientometric Review of Coronavirus Research

A. K. SrivastavaSarika VermaEmail authorMedha MiliSamarendra MajiArfat AnisS. A. R. HashmiKunal PalEmail authorChapter

First Online: 01 January 2022

Part of the Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials book series (MHFNN)Abstract

A deadly novel coronavirus disease or severe acute respiratory syndrome (COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2) has taken the entire globe in its grip and claimed over more than 0.1 million lives across the globe in barely four months of time. This has attracted researchers, medical practitioners, scientists, biologist’s fraternity, etc. all over the world to join hands in fighting the pandemic. Therefore, a detailed study in the field of coronavirus, especially related to the research status and gaps under a common umbrella, will further help in understanding and improving the current scenario. In the present paper, the scientometric analysis technique was utilized for understanding the recent research activities, scientific trends, and global involvement in the research on coronavirus. Herein, Web of Science database was used for searching the documents. The “articles” in the “English” language were considered in the study. The VoSviewer software was used for carrying out the scientometric analysis. The scanning of the research publication status on a year-on-year basis suggested an increase in the field of research on coronavirus in the recent past. From 2000 till 2020, a total of 9257 number of research articles were published. Among all other countries, USA has the most number of documents published. Analysis of the journals, authors, organizations, funding agencies of the countries and their co-operation network were also analyzed based on citations. Further, co-occurrence analysis of the different keywords suggested that coronavirus related diseases are known to precipitate severe acute respiratory syndrome in the patients. This is also true in the case of COVID-19.

KeywordsScientometric analysis Coronavirus COVID-19 Pandemic VoSviewer software 

This is a preview of subscription content,

log in

to check access.

NotesAcknowledgements

All the authors are thankful for their institutional support.

Competing Interests

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Author Contributions

All the authors contributed to data collection, drafting, editing, or revising the article gave final approval of the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Referrences

1.

Zhou F et al (2020) Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet

Google Scholar

2.

Sohrabi C et al (2020) World health organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surgery

Google Scholar

3.

Walls AC et al (2020) Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell

Google Scholar

4.

Zhong N et al (2003) Epidemiology and cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Guangdong. People’s Republic of China. Lancet 362(9393):1353–1358

Google Scholar

5.

de Groot RJ et al (2013) Commentary: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): announcement of the Coronavirus Study Group. J Virology 87(14):7790–7792

Google Scholar

6.

Makino S, Joo M, Makino JK (1991) A system for study of coronavirus mRNA synthesis: a regulated, expressed subgenomic defective interfering RNA results from intergenic site insertion. J Virology 65(11):6031–6041

Google Scholar

7.

Liu C et al (2020) Research and development on therapeutic agents and vaccines for COVID-19 and related human coronavirus diseases. ACS Central Science 6(3)315–331

Google Scholar

8.

Gallagher TM (1996) Murine coronavirus membrane fusion is blocked by modification of thiols buried within the spike protein. J Virology 70(7):4683–4690

Google Scholar

9.

Li F et al (2005) Structure of SARS coronavirus spike receptor-binding domain complexed with receptor. Sci 309(5742):1864–1868

Google Scholar

10.

Han Y, Yang H (2020) The transmission and diagnosis of 2019 novel coronavirus infection disease (COVID‐19): a Chinese perspective. J Med Virology

Google Scholar

11.

Paules CI, Marston HD, Fauci AS (2020) Coronavirus infections—more than just the common cold. Jama 323(8):707–708

Google Scholar

12.

Nikhra V, Exploring pathophysiology of COVID-19 infection: faux espoir and dormant therapeutic options

Google Scholar

13.

Chen Z-M et al (2020) Diagnosis and treatment recommendations for pediatric respiratory infection caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus. World J Pediatrics 1–7

Google Scholar

14.

Zhang H et al (2020) Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Medicine 1–5

Google Scholar

15.

Li Z, Huang Y, Guo X (2020) The brain, another potential target organ, needs early protection from SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion. Sci China Life Sci 1

Google Scholar

16.

Ashour HM et al (2020) Insights into the recent 2019 novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in light of past human coronavirus outbreaks. Pathogens 9(3):186

Google Scholar

17.

Xu Y-H, et al (2020) Clinical and computed tomographic imaging features of novel coronavirus pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2. J Inf

Google Scholar

18.

Yang Y et al (2019) A bibliometric review of laboratory safety in universities. Safety Sci 120:14–24

Google Scholar

19.

van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometric 84(2):523–538

Google Scholar

20.

Allander T et al (2005) Cloning of a human parvovirus by molecular screening of respiratory tract samples. Proceed Nat Academy Sci United States America 102(36):12891

Google Scholar

21.

Ksiazek TG et al (2003) A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. New England J Med 348(20):1953–1966

Google Scholar

22.

Drosten C et al (2003) Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. New England J Med 348(20)1967–1976

Google Scholar

23.

Rota PA et al (2003) Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Sci 300(5624):1394

Google Scholar

24.

Peiris JSM et al (2003) Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361(9366):1319–1325

Google Scholar

25.

Zaki AM et al (2012) Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. New England J Med 367(19):1814–1820

Google Scholar

26.

Marra MA et al (2003) The genome sequence of the SARS associated coronavirus. Sci 300(5624):1399

Google Scholar

27.

Li W et al (2003) Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 426(6965):450–454

Google Scholar

28.

Guan Y et al (2003) Isolation and characterization of viruses related to the SARS coronavirus from animals in Southern hina. Sci 302(5643):276

Google Scholar

29.

Li W et al (2005) Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Sci 310(5748):676

Google Scholar

30.

Peiris JSM et al (2003) Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: a prospective study. Lancet 361(9371):1767–1772

Google Scholar

31.

van der Hoek L et al (2004) Identification of a new human coronavirus. Nature Med 10(4):368–373

Google Scholar

32.

Snijder EJ et al (2003) Unique and conserved features of genome and proteome of SARS coronavirus, an early split-off from the coronavirus group 2 lineage. J Mole Biol 331(5):991–1004

Google Scholar

33.

Poutanen SM et al (2003) Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada. New England J Med 348(20):1995–2005

Google Scholar

34.

Lau SKP et al (2005) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-like virus in Chinese horseshoe bats. Proceed National Academy Sci United States Am 102(39):14040

Google Scholar

35.

Woo PCY et al (2005) Characterization and complete genome sequence of a novel coronavirus, coronavirus HKU1, from patients with pneumonia. J Virology 79(2):884

Google Scholar

36.

Assiri A et al (2013) Hospital outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. New England J Med 369(5):407–416

Google Scholar

37.

Chen Y et al (2013) Human infections with the emerging avian influenza A H7N9 virus from wet market poultry: clinical analysis and characterisation of viral genome. Lancet 381(9881):1916–1925

Google Scholar

38.

Kuiken T et al (2003) Newly discovered coronavirus as the primary cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 362(9380):263–270

Google Scholar

39.

Gaynor AM et al (2007) Identification of a novel polyomavirus from patients with acute respiratory tract infections. PLoS Pathogens 3(5)

Google Scholar

40.

Raj VS et al (2013) Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature 495(7440):251–254

Google Scholar

41.

Anand K et al (2003) Coronavirus main proteinase (3CL

pro

) structure: basis for design of anti-SARS drugs. Sci 300(5626):1763

Google Scholar

42.

Ruuskanen O et al (2011) Viral pneumonia. Lancet 377(9773):1264–1275

Google Scholar

43.

Nicholls JM et al (2003) Lung pathology of fatal severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361(9371):1773–1778

Google Scholar

44.

Allander T et al (2007) Human bocavirus and acute wheezing in children. Clinical Infect Diseases 44(7):904–910

Google Scholar

45.

Imai Y et al (2005) Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature 436(7047):112–116

Google Scholar

46.

Traggiai E et al (2004) An efficient method to make human monoclonal antibodies from memory B cells: potent neutralization of SARS coronavirus. Nature Med 10(8):871–875

Google Scholar

47.

Thiel V et al (2003) Mechanisms and enzymes involved in SARS coronavirus genome expression. J General Virology 84(9):2305–2315

Google Scholar

48.

Kuo-Chen C (2015) Impacts of bioinformatics to medicinal chemistry. Med Chem 11(3):218–234

Google Scholar

49.

Bosch BJ et al (2003) The coronavirus spike protein Is a class I virus fusion protein: structural and functional characterization of the fusion core complex. J Virology 77(16):8801

Google Scholar

50.

Assiri A et al (2013) Epidemiological, demographic, and clinical characteristics of 47 cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease from Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Diseases 13(9):752–761

Google Scholar

51.

Daffis S et al (2010) 2’-O methylation of the viral mRNA cap evades host restriction by IFIT family members. Nature 468(7322):452–456

Google Scholar

52.

Fraser C et al (2004) Factors that make an infectious disease outbreak controllable. Proceed Nat Academy Sci United States Am 101(16):6146

Google Scholar

53.

van Boheemen S et al (2012) Genomic characterization of a newly discovered coronavirus associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in Humans. mBio 3(6):e00473–12

Google Scholar

54.

Cinatl J et al (2003) Glycyrrhizin, an active component of liquorice roots, and replication of SARS-associated coronavirus. Lancet 361(9374):2045–2046

Google Scholar

55.

Meyers LA et al (2005) Network theory and SARS: predicting outbreak diversity. J Theoret Biol 232(1):71–81

Google Scholar

56.

Reusken CBEM et al (2013) Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus neutralising serum antibodies in dromedary camels: a comparative serological study. Lancet Infect Diseases 13(10):859–866

Google Scholar

57.

Weinstein RA, Hota B (2004) Contamination, disinfection, and cross-colonization: are hospital surfaces reservoirs for nosocomial infection? Clinical Infect Diseases 39(8):1182–1189

Google Scholar

58.

Woo PCY et al, Discovery of seven novel mammalian and avian coronaviruses in the genus deltacoronavirus supports bat coronaviruses as the gene source of alpha coronavirus and beta coronavirus and avian coronaviruses as the gene source of gamma coronavirus and deltacoronavirus

Google ScholarCopyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2022

Authors and AffiliationsA. K. SrivastavaSarika VermaEmail authorMedha MiliSamarendra MajiArfat AnisS. A. R. HashmiKunal PalEmail author1.Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Advanced Materials and Processes Research Institute (AMPRI)BhopalIndia2.Department of ChemistrySRM Institute of Science and TechnologyKanchipuramIndia3.Department of Chemical EngineeringSABIC Polymer Research Center, King Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia4.Department of Biotechnology and Medical EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyRourkelaIndia

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif