1. Duncan, PW, Jorgensen, HS, Wade, DT. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000; 31: 1429–1438.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI2. Salter, KL, Teasell, RW, Foley, NC, et al. Outcome assessment in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 86: 1007–1012.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Anderson, C, Laubscher, S, Burns, R. Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke 1996; 27: 1812–1816.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI4. McHorney, CA, Ware, JE, Raczek, AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31: 247–263.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI5. Salaffi, F, Carotti, M, Ciapetti, A, et al. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2011; 29: 661–671.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI6. Jaeschke, R, Singer, J, Guyatt, GH. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Cont Clin Trials 1989; 10: 407–415.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. McGlothlin, AE, Lewis, RJ. Minimal Clinically Important Difference: Defining What Really Matters to Patients. JAMA 2014; 312: 1342–1343.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI8. Revicki, D, Hays, RD, Cella, D, et al. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 102–109.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI9. Liang, MH, Lew, RA, Stucki, G, et al. Measuring clinically important changes with patient-oriented questionnaires. Med Care 2002; 40: II45–II51.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI10. Norman, GR, Sloan, JA, Wyrwich, KW. Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life: The Remarkable Universality of Half a Standard Deviation. Med Care 2003; 41: 582–592.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI11. Strand, V, Singh, JA Improved health-related quality of life with effective disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: evidence from randomized controlled trials. Am J Manag Care 2008; 14: 234–254.
Google Scholar | Medline12. Parker, SL, Adogwa, O, Mendenhall, SK, et al. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis. Spine J 2012; 12: 1122–1128.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI13. Copay, AG, Glassman, SD, Subach, BR, et al. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 2008; 6: 968–974.
Google Scholar | Crossref14. Carreon, LY, Glassman, SD, Campbell, MJ, et al. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J 2010; 6: 469–474.
Google Scholar | Crossref15. Fu, V, Weatherall, M, McPherson, K, et al. Taking Charge after Stroke: A randomized controlled trial of a person-centered, self-directed rehabilitation intervention. Int J Stroke 2020; 15: 954–964.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI16. Von Elm, E, Altman, DG, Egger, M, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies BMJ 2007; 335: 806.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Ware, JE, Snow, KK, Kosinski, M, et al. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.
Google Scholar18. Ware, JE, Kosinski, M., Keller, SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1994.
Google Scholar19. Gandek, B, Ware, JE, Aaronson, NK. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1171–1178.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. Samsa, G, Edelman, D, Rothman, ML, et al. Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II. Pharmacoeconomics 1999; 15: 141–155.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI21. Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, 1988.
Google Scholar22. Eton, DT, Cella, D, Yost, KJ, et al. A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57: 898–910.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI23. Hawkes, WG, Williams, GR, Zimmerman, S, et al. A clinically meaningful difference was generated for a performance measure of recovery from hip fracture. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57: 1019–1024.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Salinas, J, Sprinkhuizen, SM, Ackerson, T, et al. An International Standard Set of Patient-Centered Outcome Measures After Stroke. Stroke 2016; 47: 180–186.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Van Swieten, JC, Koudstaal, PJ, Visser, MC, et al. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988; 19: 604–607.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI26. Lees, KR, Bath, PM, Schellinger, PD, et al. Contemporary outcome measures in acute stroke research: choice of primary outcome measure. Stroke 2012; 43: 1163–1170.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI