1. Hirabayashi, K, Satomi, K. Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine. 1988;13:870-876.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI2. Nakano, K, Harata, S, Suetsuna, F, Araki, T, Itoh, J. Spinous process-splitting laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spinous process spacer. Spine. 1992;17:S41-S43.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI3. Choi, SH, Kang, C-N. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: pathophysiology and current treatment strategies. Asian Spine Journal. 2020;14(5):710-720.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Kimura, I, Shingu, H, Nasu, Y. Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Br Vol. 1995;77-B:956-961.
Google Scholar | Crossref5. Hyun, S-J, Rhim, S-C, Roh, S-W, Kang, S-H, Riew, KD. The time course of range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty. Spine. 2009;34:1134-1139.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI6. Fujiwara, H, Oda, T, Makino, T, Moriguchi, Y, Yonenobu, K, Kaito, T. Impact of cervical sagittal alignment on axial neck pain and health-related quality of life after cervical laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication. 2018;31:E245-E251.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Lee, B-J, Park, JH, Jeon, S-R, Rhim, S-C, Roh, SW. Importance of the preoperative cross-sectional area of the semispinalis cervicis as a risk factor for loss of lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:2720-2728.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Kato, M, Nakamura, H, Konishi, S, et al. Effect of preserving paraspinal muscles on postoperative axial pain in the selective cervical laminoplasty. Spine. 2008;33(14):E455-E459.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI9. Takeuchi, K, Yokoyama, T, Ono, A, et al. Limitation of activities of daily living accompanying reduced neck mobility after laminoplasty preserving or reattaching the semispinalis cervicis into axis. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:415-420.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Takeuchi, K, Yokoyama, T, Ono, A, et al. Cervical range of motion and alignment after laminoplasty preserving or reattaching the semispinalis cervicis inserted into axis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20:571-576.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Shimizu, K, Mitsuhara, T, Takeda, M, Kurisu, K, Yamaguchi, S. Effects of preservation of the semispinalis cervicis inserted into c2 on craniocervical alignment after laminoplasty. World Neurosurg. 2021;146:e1367-e76.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Chen, C, Li, J, Liao, Z, Gao, Y, Shao, Z, Yang, C. C3 laminectomy combined with modified unilateral laminoplasty and in situ reconstruction of the midline structures maintained cervical sagittal balance: a retrospective matched-pair case-control study. Spine J. 2020;20:1403-1412.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Lee, Y-S, Lee, S, Ko, MJ, Cho, D-C, Kim, K-T. Preservation of deep cervical extensor muscle volume: comparison between conventional open-door and muscle preserving laminoplasty approaches in the same patients. World Neurosurgery. 2020;141:e514-e523.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Secer, HI, Polat, B. New laminoplasty technique for preserving paravertebral muscles: technical note. Turkish neurosurgery. 2019;29(5):658-663.
Google Scholar | Medline15. Conley, MS, Meyer, RA, Bloomberg, j. J, Feeback, DL, Dudley, GA. Noninvasive analysis of human neck muscle function. Spine. 1995;20:2505-2512.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Vasabada, AN, Li, S, Delp, SL. Influence of muscle morphometry and moment arms on the moment-generating capacity of human neck muscles. Spine. 1998;23:412-422.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Schomacher, J, Farina, D, Lindstroem, R, Falla, D. Chronic trauma-induced neck pain impairs the neural control of the deep semispinalis cervicis muscle. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(7):1403-1408.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Hosono, N, Sakaura, H, Mukai, Y, Yoshikawa, H. The source of axial pain after cervical laminoplasty-C7 is more crucial than deep extensor muscles. Spine. 2007;32(26):2985-2988.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI19. Takeuchi, T, Shono, Y. Importance of preserving the C7 spinous process and attached nuchal ligament in French-door laminoplasty to reduce postoperative axial symptoms. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1417-1422.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. Kowatari, K, Ueyama, K, Sannohe, A, Yamasaki, Y. Preserving the C7 spinous process with its muscles attached: effect on axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2009;14(3):279-284.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Sakaura, H, Hosono, N, Mukai, Y, Fujimori, T, Iwasaki, M, Yoshikawa, H. Preservation of muscles attached to the C2 and C7 spinous processes rather than subaxial deep extensors reduces adverse effects after cervical laminoplasty. Spine. 2010;35(16):E782-E786.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI22. Takeuchi, K, Yokoyama, T, Aburakawa, S, Itabashi, T, Toh, S. Anatomic study of the semispinalis cervicis for reattachment during Laminoplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;&NA;:126-131.
Google Scholar | Crossref23. Iizuka, H, Iizuka, Y, Nakagawa, Y, Nakajima, T, Toda, N, Shimegi, A, et al. Interlaminar bony fusion after cervical laminoplasty: its characteristics and relationship with clinical results. Spine. 2006;31:644-647.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Lee, D-H, Cho, JH, Hwang, CJ, Lee, CS, Cho, SK, Ha, J-K. Can C3 laminectomy reduce interlaminar bony fusion and preserve the range of motion after cervical laminoplasty? Spine. 2016;41:1884-1890.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline