Shared Decision Making in Health Care: Theoretical Perspectives for Why It Works and For Whom

1. Légaré, F, Thompson-Leduc, P. Twelve myths about shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(3):281–6.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Nayfield, SG, Bongiovanni, GC, Alciati, MH, Fischer, RA, Bergner, L. Statutory requirements for disclosure of breast cancer treatment alternatives. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86(16):1202–8.
Google Scholar | Crossref3. Frosch, DL, Kaplan, RM. Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17(4):285–94.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Makoul, G, Clayman, ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(3):301–12.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Braddock, CH, Edwards, KA, Hasenberg, NM, Laidley, TL, Levinson, W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282(24):2313–20.
Google Scholar | Medline6. Bomhof-Roordink, H, Gärtner, FR, Stiggelbout, AM, Pieterse, AH. Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12):e031763.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Peek, ME, Tang, H, Cargill, A, Chin, MH. Are there racial differences in patients’ shared decision-making preferences and behaviors among patients with diabetes? Med Decis Making. 2011;31(3):422–31.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals8. Kiesler, DJ, Auerbach, SM. Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(3):319–41.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Deci, E, Ryan, R. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum; 1985.
Google Scholar | Crossref10. Ryan, RM, Kuhl, J, Deci, EL. Nature and autonomy: an organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Dev Psychopathol. 1997;9(4):701–28.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Ryan, RM, Deci, EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI12. Markland, D, Ryan, RM, Tobin, VJ, Rollnick, S. Motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2005;24(6):811–31.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Deci, E, Ryan, R. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inquiry. 2000;11:227–68.
Google Scholar | Crossref14. Ng, JYY, Ntoumanis, N, Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C, et al. Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: a meta-analysis. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7(4):325–40.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals15. Shumway, D, Griffith, KA, Jagsi, R, Gabram, SG, Williams, GC, Resnicow, K. Psychometric properties of a brief measure of autonomy support in breast cancer patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2015;15:51.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Vansteenkiste, M, Williams, GC, Resnicow, K. Toward systematic integration between self-determination theory and motivational interviewing as examples of top-down and bottom-up intervention development: autonomy or volition as a fundamental theoretical principle. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:23.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI17. Resnicow, K, Teixeira, PJ, Williams, GC. Efficient allocation of public health and behavior change resources: the “difficulty by motivation” matrix. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(1):55–7.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Levinson, W, Kao, A, Kuby, A, Thisted, RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making: a national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(6):531–5.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Murray, E, Pollack, L, White, M, Lo, B. Clinical decision-making: patients’ preferences and experiences. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(2):189–96.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Johnson, RL, Roter, D, Powe, NR, Cooper, LA. Patient race/ethnicity and quality of patient-physician communication during medical visits. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(12):2084–90.
Google Scholar | Crossref21. Levinson, W, Hudak, PL, Feldman, JJ, Frankel, RM, Kuby, A, Bereknyei, S, Braddock, C. “It’s not what you say …”: racial disparities in communication between orthopedic surgeons and patients. Med Care. 2008;46(4):410–6.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Ghods, BK, Roter, DL, Ford, DE, Larson, S, Arbelaez, JJ, Cooper, LA. Patient-physician communication in the primary care visits of African Americans and whites with depression. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(5):600–6.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Kaplan, SH, Gandek, B, Greenfield, S, Rogers, W, Ware, JE. Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians’ participatory decision-making style: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1995;33(12):1176–87.
Google Scholar24. van Ryn, M, Burke, J. The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians’ perceptions of patients. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(6):813–28.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Peek, ME, Odoms-Young, A, Quinn, MT, Gorawara-Bhat, R, Wilson, SC, Chin, MH. Race and shared decision-making: perspectives of African-Americans with diabetes. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(1):1–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI26. Cooper-Patrick, L, Gallo, JJ, Gonzales, JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999;282(6):583–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Hack, TF, Degner, LF, Watson, P, Sinha, L. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15(1):9–19.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI28. Grobe, JE, Goggin, K, Harris, KJ, Richter, KP, Resnicow, K, Catley, D. Race moderates the effects of motivational interviewing on smoking cessation induction. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(2):350–8.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Resnicow, K, Rollnick, S. Motivational interviewing in health promotion & behavioral medicine settings. In: Cox, WM, Klinger, E, eds. Handbook of Motivational Counseling: Motivating People for Change. 2nd ed. Sussex (UK): Wiley and Sons; 2011. p 581–95.
Google Scholar | Crossref30. Resnicow, K, McMaster, F, Rollnick, S. Action reflections: a client-centered technique to bridge the WHY-HOW transition in motivational interviewing. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2012;40(4):474–80.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Resnicow, K, McMaster, F. Motivational interviewing: moving from why to how with autonomy support. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:19.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI32. Miller, WR, Rollnick, S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.
Google Scholar33. Zuckoff, A, Dew, MA. Research on MI in equipoise: the case of living organ donation. Motivational Interviewing: Training, Research, Implementation, and Practice. 2012;1(1):39–41.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. Dillard, JP, Shen, L. On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Commun Monogr. 2005;72(2):144–68.
Google Scholar | Crossref35. Brehm, SS, Brehm, JW. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. New York: Academic Press; 1981.
Google Scholar36. Miller, S, Khensani, N, Beech, B. Perceptions of physical activity and motivational interviewing among rural African-American women with type 2 diabetes. Women’s Health Issues. 2010;1–7.
Google Scholar | Medline37. Miller, ST, Marolen, KN, Beech, BM. Perceptions of physical activity and motivational interviewing among rural African-American women with type 2 diabetes. Womens Health Issues. 2010;20(1):43–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline38. Lundahl, B, Moleni, T, Burke, BL, et al. Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(2):157–68.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline39. Resnicow, K, Zhou, Y, Hawley, S, et al. Communication preference moderates the effect of a tailored intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;97(3):370–5.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline40. Resnicow, K, Davis, RE, Zhang, G, et al. Tailoring a fruit and vegetable intervention on novel motivational constructs: results of a randomized study. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35(2):159–69.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline41. Resnicow, K, Abrahamse, P, Tocco, RS, et al. Development and psychometric properties of a brief measure of subjective decision quality for breast cancer treatment. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2014;14:110.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline42. Martinez, KA, Resnicow, K, Williams, GC, et al. Does physician communication style impact patient report of decision quality for breast cancer treatment? Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(12):1947–54.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline43. Lantz, PM, Janz, NK, Fagerlin, A, et al. Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(3):745–68.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline44. Hawley, ST, Lantz, PM, Janz, NK, et al. Factors associated with patient involvement in surgical treatment decision making for breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(3):387–95.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline45. Simon, D, Loh, A, Wills, CE, Härter, M. Depressed patients’ perceptions of depression treatment decision-making. Health Expect. 2007;10(1):62–74.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline46. Caverly, TJ, Hayward, RA. Dealing with the lack of time for detailed shared decision-making in primary care: everyday shared decision-making. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(10):3045–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline47. Janis, IL, Mann, L. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: Free Press; 1977.
Google Scholar48. Velicer, WF, Norman, GJ, Fava, JL, Prochaska, JO. Testing 40 predictions from the transtheoretical model. Addict Behav. 1999;24(4):455–69.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline49. Bandura, A . Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1986.
Google Scholar50. Hibbard, JH, Stockard, J, Mahoney, ER, Tusler, M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4 pt 1):1005–26.
Google Scholar | Medline51. Collins, L . Optimization of Behavioral, Biobehavioral, and Biomedical Interventions: The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST). New York: Springer; 2018.
Google Scholar52. Nair, V, Strecher, V, Fagerlin, A, et al. Screening experiments and the use of fractional factorial designs in behavioral intervention research. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(8):1354–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline53. Smit, ES, Zeidler, C, Resnicow, K, de Vries, H. Identifying the most autonomy-supportive message frame in digital health communication: a 2x2 between-subjects experiment. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(10):e14074.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline54. Hawley, ST, Morris, AM. Cultural challenges to engaging patients in shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(1):18–24.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif