1. Engelter, AT, Gostynski, M, Papa, S, et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 1379–1384.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI2. Pederson, PM, Jørgensen, HS, Nakayama, H, et al. Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol 1995; 38(4): 659–666.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Kruithof, WJ, van Mierlo, ML, Visser-Meily, JM, et al. Associations between social support and stroke survivors’ health-related quality of life – a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 93(2): 169–76.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Godecke, E, Armstrong, E, Hersh, D, et al. Missed opportunities: communicative interactions in early stroke recovery. In: Int J Stroke: Proceedings of the Stroke Society of Australasia Annual Scientific Meeting. ; Hamilton Island, Queensland. Worlds Stroke Organization; 2014. p 48.
Google Scholar5. Murphy, TH, Corbett, D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Neurosci 2009; 10: 861–872.
Google Scholar | Crossref6. Eng, X, Brauer, SG, Kuys, SS, et al. Factors affecting the ability of the stroke survivor to drive their own recovery outside of therapy during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res Treat 2014; 2014: 626538.
Google Scholar | Medline7. Karelina, K, Norman, GJ, Zhang, N, et al. Social contact influences histological and behavioral outcomes following cerebral ischemia. Exp Neurol 2009; 220: 276–282.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Nithianantharajah, J, Hannan, AJ. Enriched environments, experience dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006; 7(9): 697–709.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI9. Janssen, H, Bernhardt, J, Collier, JM, et al. An enriched environment improves sensorimotor function post–ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24(9): 802–813.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI10. Janssen, H, Ada, L, Bernhardt, J, et al. An enriched environment increases activity in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation in a mixed rehabilitation unit: a pilot non-randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil 2014; 36(3): 255–262.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Rosbergen, ICM, Grimley, RS, Hayward, KS, et al. Embedding an enriched environment in an acute stroke unit increases activity in people with stroke: a controlled before–after pilot study. Clin Rehabil 2017; 31(11): 1516–1528.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI12. Janssen, H, Ada, L, Middleton, S, et al. Altering the rehabilitation environment to improve stroke survivor activity: a phase II trial. Int J Stroke. Epub ahead of print 13 April 2021. DOI: 10.1177/17474930211006999.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals13. D’Souza, S, Godecke, E, Ciccone, N, et al. Hospital staff, volunteers’, and patients’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators to communication following stroke in an acute and a rehabilitation private hospital ward: a qualitative description study. BMJ Open 2021; 11(5): e043897.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Teasdale, G, Jennett, B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2(7872): 81–84.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI15. D’Souza, S, Hersh, D, Godecke, E, et al. Patients’ experiences of a Communication Enhanced Environment model in an acute and rehabilitation ward following stroke: a qualitative description approach. Disabil Rehabil (under review).
Google Scholar16. D’Souza, S, Ciccone, N, Hersh, D, et al. Staff and volunteer perceptions of a Communication Enhanced Environment model in an acute and a rehabilitation hospital ward: a qualitative description study within a before-and after pilot study. Disabil Rehabil (under review).
Google Scholar17. NIH . NIH stroke scale. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U.S.). https://www.ninds.nih.gov/sites/default/files/NIH_Stroke_Scale.pdf (2011, accessed 10 February 2016).
Google Scholar18. Nasreddine, ZS, Phillips, NA, Bédirian, V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53(4): 695–699.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI19. Kertesz, A . Western Aphasia battery. Revised. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assess.
Google Scholar20. Coulson, NS, Ferguson, MA, Henshaw, H, et al. Applying theories of health behaviour and change to hearing health research: time for a new approach. Int J Audiol 2016; 55(Suppl 3): S99–S104.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Burnett, S, Benn, J, Pinto, A, et al. Organisational readiness: exploring the preconditions for success in organisation-wide patient safety improvement programmes. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19(4): 313–317.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Graham, ID, Logan, J, Harrison, MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006; 26: 13–24.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI23. Michie, S, van Stralen, MM, West, R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 2011; 6(42): 1–11.
Google Scholar | Medline24. Michie, S, Wood, CE, Johnston, M, et al. Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behavior change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data). Health Technol Assess 2015; 19(99): 1–188.
Google Scholar | Crossref25. Brady, MC, Kelly, H, Godwin, J, et al. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 1(6): CD000425.
Google Scholar26. Kagan, A . Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology 1998; 12(9): 816–830.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI27. The AVERT Trial Collaboration Group . Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 386: 46–55.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI28. Godecke, E, Armstrong, E, Rai, T, et al. A randomized control trial of intensive aphasia therapy after acute stroke: the Very Early Rehabilitation for SpEech (VERSE) study. Int J Stroke. Epub ahead of print 6 October 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1747493020961926.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals29. Stroke Foundation . National stroke audit—acute services report, 2019. Stroke Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2019.
Google Scholar30. Ball, JE, Murrells, T, Rafferty, AM, et al. ‘Care left undone’ during nursing shifts: associations with workload and perceived quality of care. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23(2): 116–125.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI31. Shannon, MM, Lipson-Smith, R, Elf, M, et al. Bringing the single versus multi-patient room debate to vulnerable patient populations: a systematic review of the impact of room types on hospitalized older people and people with neurological disorders. Intell Build Int 2020; 12(30): 180–198.
Google Scholar | Crossref32. Ploeg, J, Davies, B, Edwards, N, et al. Factors influencing best-practice guideline implementation: lessons learned from administrators, nursing staff, and project leaders. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2007; 4(4): 210–219.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI33. Rosbergen, ICM, Brauer, SG, Fitzhenry, S, et al. Qualitative investigation if the perceptions and experiences of nursing and Allied Health professionals involved in the implementation of an enriched environment in and Australian acute stroke unit. BMJ Open 2017; 7(12): e018226.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. White, JH, Bartley, E, Janssen, H, et al. Exploring stroke survivor experience of participation in an enriched environment: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2015; 37(7): 593–600.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline35. Bauer, MS, Kirchner, J. Implementation science: what is it and why should i care? Psychiatry Res 2020; 283; 112376.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Lynch, EA, Chesworth, BM, Connell, LA. Implementation – the missing link in the research translation pipeline: is it any wonder no one ever implements evidence-based practice? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2018; 32(9): 751–761.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI37. Bartlett, G, Blais, R, Tamblyn, R, et al. Impact of patient communication problems on the risk of preventable adverse events in acute care settings. Can Med Assoc J 2008; 178(12): 1555–1562.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI38. Legg, C, Young, L, Bryer, A. Training sixth-year medical students in obtaining case-history information from adults with aphasia. Aphasiology 2005; 19(6): 559–575.
Google Scholar | Crossref39. Street, RL, Makoul, G, Arora, NK, et al. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 74: 295–301.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI40. Duncan, E, O’Cathain, A, Rousseau, N, et al. Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study. BMJ Open 2020; 10(4): e033516.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline41. Eldridge, SM, Chan, CL, Campbell, MJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ 2016; 355: i5239.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline42. Hoffmann, T, Glasziou, P, Boutron, I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014; 348: g1687.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline