1. Charles, C, Gafni, A, Whelan, T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–92.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Charles, C, Gafni, A, Whelan, T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Huang, C, Plummer, V, Lam, L, Cross, W. Perceptions of shared decision making in severe mental illness: An integrative review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020;27(2):103–27.
Google Scholar | Crossref4. Tamirisa, NP, Goodwin, JS, Kandalam, A, et al. Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer. Health Expect. 2017;20:1248–53.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Couët, N, Desroches, S, Robitaille, H, et al. Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect. 2015;18:542–61.
Google Scholar | Crossref6. Doherr, H, Christalle, E, Kriston, L, Harter, M, Scholl, I. Use of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc) in intervention studies: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0173904.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Covvey, JR, Kamal, KM, Gorse, EE, et al. Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27:1613–37.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Légaré, F, Ratté, S, Gravel, K, Graham, ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:526–35.
Google Scholar | Crossref9. Légaré, F, Adekpedjou, R, Stacey, D, et al. Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7:CD006732.
Google Scholar | Medline10. Stacey, D, Légaré, F, Lewis, K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431.
Google Scholar | Medline11. Bomhof-Roordink, H, Gärtner, FR, Stiggelbout, AM, Pieterse, AH. Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e031763.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Bomhof-Roordink, H, Fischer, MJ, van Duijn-Bakker, N, et al. Shared decision making in oncology: a model based on patients’, health care professionals’, and researchers’ views. Psychooncology. 2019;28:139–46.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Elwyn, G, Edwards, A, Kinnersley, P, Grol, R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:892–9.
Google Scholar | Medline14. Elwyn, G, Frosch, D, Thomson, R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1361–7.
Google Scholar | Crossref15. Légaré, F, Stacey, D, Pouliot, S, et al. Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: a stepwise approach towards a new model. J Interprof Care. 2011;25:18–25.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI16. Lenzen, SA, Daniels, R, van Bokhoven, MA, van der Weijden, T, Beurskens, A. Development of a conversation approach for practice nurses aimed at making shared decisions on goals and action plans with primary care patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:891.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Moore, CL, Kaplan, SL. A framework and resources for shared decision making: opportunities for improved physical therapy outcomes. Phys Ther. 2018;98:1022–36.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Rusiecki, J, Schell, J, Rothenberger, S, Merriam, S, McNeil, M, Spagnoletti, C. An innovative shared decision-making curriculum for internal medicine residents: findings from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Acad Med. 2018;93:937–42.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Simon, D, Schorr, G, Wirtz, M, et al. Development and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q). Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:319–27.
Google Scholar | Crossref20. Stiggelbout, AM, Pieterse, AH, De Haes, JC. Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:1172–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref21. van de Pol, MH, Fluit, CR, Lagro, J, Slaats, YH, Olde Rikkert, MG, Lagro-Janssen, AL. Expert and patient consensus on a dynamic model for shared decision-making in frail older patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:1069–77.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Saidinejad, M . The patient-centered emergency department. Adv Pediatr. 2018;65:105–20.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Kunneman, M, Branda, ME, Hargraves, I, Pieterse, AH, Montori, VM. Fostering choice awareness for shared decision making: a secondary analysis of video-recorded clinical encounters. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2018;2:60–8.
Google Scholar | Medline24. Kunneman, M, Engelhardt, EG, Ten Hove, FL, et al. Deciding about (neo-)adjuvant rectal and breast cancer treatment: missed opportunities for shared decision making. Acta Oncol. 2016;55:134–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref25. Volk, RJ, Shokar, NK, Leal, VB, et al. Development and pilot testing of an online case-based approach to shared decision making skills training for clinicians. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2014;14:95.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Engelhardt, EG, Pieterse, AH, van der Hout, A, et al. Use of implicit persuasion in decision making about adjuvant cancer treatment: a potential barrier to shared decision making. Eur J Cancer. 2016;66:55–66.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Karnieli-Miller, O, Eisikovits, Z. Physician as partner or salesman? Shared decision-making in real-time encounters. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1–8.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI28. Ziebland, S, Chapple, A, Evans, J. Barriers to shared decisions in the most serious of cancers: a qualitative study of patients with pancreatic cancer treated in the UK. Health Expect. 2015;18:3302–12.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Strough, J, de Bruin, WB, Peters, E. New perspectives for motivating better decisions in older adults. Front Psychol. 2015;6:783.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. van der Meulen, N, Jansen, J, van Dulmen, S, Bensing, J, van Weert, J. Interventions to improve recall of medical information in cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature. Psychooncology. 2008;17:857–68.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Shay, LA, Lafata, JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Making. 2015;35:114–31.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals32. Politi, MC, Clark, MA, Ombao, H, Dizon, D, Elwyn, G. Communicating uncertainty can lead to less decision satisfaction: a necessary cost of involving patients in shared decision making? Health Expect. 2011;14:84–91.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI33. Shay, LA, Lafata, JE. Understanding patient perceptions of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96:295–301.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI34. Engelhardt, EG, Smets, EMA, Sorial, I, Stiggelbout, AM, Pieterse, AH, Hillen, MA. Is there a relationship between shared decision making and breast cancer patients’ trust in their medical oncologists? Med Decis Making. 2020;40:52–61.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI35. Ommen, O, Thuem, S, Pfaff, H, Janssen, C. The relationship between social support, shared decision-making and patient’s trust in doctors: a cross-sectional survey of 2,197 inpatients using the Cologne Patient Questionnaire. Int J Public Health. 2011;56:319–27.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Thum, S, Janssen, C, Pfaff, H, Lefering, R, Neugebauer, EA, Ommen, O. The association between psychosocial care by physicians and patients’ trust: a retrospective analysis of severely injured patients in surgical intensive care units. Psychosoc Med. 2012;9:Doc04.
Google Scholar | Medline37. Lam, WW, Kwok, M, Chan, M, et al. Does the use of shared decision-making consultation behaviors increase treatment decision-making satisfaction among Chinese women facing decision for breast cancer surgery? Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94:243–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline38. Hillen, MA, van Vliet, LM, de Haes, HC, Smets, EM. Developing and administering scripted video vignettes for experimental research of patient-provider communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91:295–309.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline39. Lehmann, V, Labrie, NHM, van Weert, JCM, et al. Tailoring the amount of treatment information to cancer patients’ and survivors’ preferences: effects on patient-reported outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103:514–20.
Google Scholar | Crossref40. Medendorp, NM, Visser, LNC, Hillen, MA, de Haes, J, Smets, EMA. How oncologists’ communication improves (analogue) patients’ recall of information; a randomized video-vignettes study. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:1338–44.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline41. Blanch-Hartigan, D, Hall, JA, Krupat, E, Irish, JT. Can naive viewers put themselves in the patients’ shoes? Reliability and validity of the analogue patient methodology. Med Care. 2013;51:e16–21.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline42. van Vliet, LM, van der Wall, E, Albada, A, Spreeuwenberg, PM, Verheul, W, Bensing, JM. The validity of using analogue patients in practitioner-patient communication research: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1528–43.
Google Scholar | Medline43. Chew, LD, Bradley, KA, Boyko, EJ. Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Fam Med. 2004;36:588–94.
Google Scholar44. Kunneman, M, Pieterse, AH, Stiggelbout, AM, et al. Treatment preferences and involvement in treatment decision making of patients with endometrial cancer and clinicians. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:674–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline45. Jansen, S, Otten, W, Baas-Thijssen, M, Van De Velde, C, Nortier, H, Stiggelbout, A. Stability of preferences with regard to adjuvant chemotherapy: impact of treatment decision, experience and the passing of time. Eur J Cancer Care. 2008;17:74–83.
Google Scholar | Medline46. Hagedoorn, M, Uijl, SG, Van Sonderen, E, et al. Structure and reliability of Ware’s Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III: patients’ satisfaction with oncological care in the Netherlands. Med Care. 2003;41:254–63.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline47. Hillen, M, Koning, C, Wilmink, J, et al. Assessing cancer patients’ trust in their oncologist: development and validation of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS). Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:1787–95.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline48. Visser, LN, Hillen, MA, Verdam, MG, Bol, N, de Haes, HC, Smets, EM. Assessing engagement while viewing video vignettes; validation of the Video Engagement Scale (VES). Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:227–35.
Google Scholar | Crossref49. Pieterse, AH, Kunneman, M, van den Hout, WB, et al. Patient explicit consideration of tradeoffs in decision making about rectal cancer treatment: benefits for decision process and quality of life. Acta Oncol. 2019;58:1069–76.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline50. Richardson, JTE . Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educ Res Rev Neth. 2011;6:135–47.
Google Scholar51. Cohen, J . Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1969.
Google Scholar52. O’Keefe, DJ . Persuasion: Theory and Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2016.
Google Scholar53. Hillen, MA, de Haes, HC, Verdam, MG, Smets, EM. Does source of patient recruitment affect the impact of communication on trust? Patient Educ Couns. 2014;95:226–30.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline54. Spinnewijn, L, Aarts, J, Verschuur, S, Braat, D, Gerrits, T, Scheele, F. Knowing what the patient wants: a hospital ethnography studying physician culture in shared decision making in the Netherlands. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e032921.
Google Scholar | Crossref |