The Listener Effect in Multitalker Speech Segregation and Talker Identification

Arbogast, T. L., Mason, C. R., Kidd, G. J. (2002). The effect of spatial separation on energetic and informational masking of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(5), 2086–2098. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1510141
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Bernstein, J., Mehrai, G., Shamma, S., Gallun, F., Theodoroff, S., Leek, M. (2013). Spectrogram modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24(4), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.24.4.5
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Best, V., Ahlstrom, J. B., Mason, C. R., Roverud, E., Perrachione, T. K., Kidd, G. J., Dubno, J. R. (2018). Talker identification: Effects of masking, hearing loss and age. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(2), 1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5024333
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Bharadwaj, H. M., Masud, S., Mehrai, G., Verhulst, S., Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2015). Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(5), 2161–2172. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3915-14.2015
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Bidelman, G. M., Yoo, J. (2020). Musicians show improved speech segregation in competitive, multi-talker cocktail party scenarios. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1927. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01927
Google Scholar Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis. M.I.T. Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref Bronkhorst, A. W. (2000). The cocktail party phenomenon: A review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 86(1), 117–128.
Google Scholar Bronkhorst, A. W. (2015). The cocktail-party problem revisited: Early processing and selection of multi-talker speech. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(5), 1465–1487. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0882-9
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Brouwer, S., Van Engen, K., Calandruccio, L., Bradlow, A. R. (2012). Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: Language familiarity and semantic content. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(2), 1449–1464. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3675943
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Brungart, D. S. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(3), 1101–1109. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1345696
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Brungart, D. S., Simpson, B. D. (2007). Cocktail party listening in a dynamic multitalker environment. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194455
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Calandruccio, L., Buss, E., Bowdrie, K. (2017). Effectiveness of two-talker maskers that differ in talker congruity and perceptual similarity to the target speech. Trends in Hearing, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216517709385
Google Scholar Calandruccio, L., Buss, E., Hall, J. W. (2014). Effects of linguistic experience on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral masker modulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(3), 1335–1343. https://doi.org10.1121/1.4864785
Google Scholar Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(3), 975–979. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907229
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Conway, A. R., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 331–335. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196169
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Dai, L., Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2016). Contributions of sensory coding and attentional control to individual differences in performance in spatial auditory selective attention tasks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 530. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00530
Google Scholar | Crossref Dewey, J. B., Dhar, S. (2017). A common microstructure in behavioral hearing thresholds and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(5), 3069–3083. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5009562
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Durlach, N. I. (2006). Auditory masking: Need for an improved conceptual structure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(4), 1787–1790. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2335426
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Füllgrabe, C., Moore, B. C., Stone, M. A. (2015). Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: Contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6(347), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347
Google Scholar Getzmann, S., Lewald, J., Falkenstein, M. (2014). Using auditory pre-information to solve the cocktail-party problem: Electrophysiological evidence for age-specific differences. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8(413), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00413
Google Scholar | Medline Green, D. M. (2020). A homily on signal detection theory. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 148(1), 222–225. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001525
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Green, D. M., Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley.
Google Scholar Hawley, M. L., Litovsky, R. Y., Culling, J. R. (2004). The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(2), 833–843. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1639908
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Hejna, D., Musicus, B. R. (1991). The SOLAFS time-scale modification algorithm (BBN Technical Report).
Google Scholar Humes, L., Christopherson, L. (1991). Speech identification difficulties of hearing impaired elderly persons. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34(3), 686–693. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3403.686
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Humes, L., Kidd, G. R., Lentz, J. (2013). Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech understanding among older adults. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00055
Google Scholar Johnson, D. M., Watson, C. S., Jenson, J. K. (1986). Individual differences in auditory capabilities. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81(2), 427–438 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.394907
Google Scholar | Crossref Kalmus, H., Fry, D. B. (1980). On tune deafness (dysmelodia): Frequency, development, genetics and musical background. Annals of Human Genetics, 43(4), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1980.tb01571.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Kidd, G. J., Colburn, S. (2017). Informational masking in speech recognition. In Middlebrooks, J. C., Simon, J. Z., Popper, A. N., Fay, R. R. (Eds.), Springer handbook of auditory research: The auditory system at the cocktail party (pp. 75–110). Springer-Verlag.
Google Scholar | Crossref Kidd, G. J., Mason, C. R., Richards, V. M., Gallun, F. J., Durlach, N. I. (2008). Informational masking. In Yost W. A., Fay R. R., & Popper A. N. (Eds.), Springer handbook of auditory research: Auditory perception of sound sources (pp. 143–190). Springer-Verlag.
Google Scholar | Crossref Kidd, G., Mason, C. R., Swaminathan, J., Roverud, E., Kameron, Clayton, K., Best, V. (2016). Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(1), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4954748
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Kidd, G., Watson, C. S., Gygi, B. (2007). Individual differences in auditory abilities. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(1), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2743154
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Kubiak, A. M., Rennies, J., Ewert, S. D., Kollmeier, B. (2020). Prediction of individual speech recognition performance in complex listening conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(3), 1379–1391. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000759
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Kujawa, S. G., Liberman, M. C. (2009). Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(45), 14077–14085. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009
Google Scholar Lee, J., Long, G. (2012). Stimulus characteristics which lessen the impact of threshold fine structure on estimates of hearing status. Hearing Research, 28(1–2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.011
Google Scholar | Medline Liberman, M. C., Epstein, M. J., Cleveland, S. S., Wang, H., Maison, S. F. (2016). Toward a differential diagnosis of hidden hearing loss in humans. PLoS ONE, 11(9), e0162726. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162726
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Lopez-Poveda, E. A. (2014). Why do I hear but not understand? Stochastic undersampling as a model of degraded neural encoding of speech. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 348, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00348
Google Scholar Lutfi, R. A., Gilbertson, L., Chang, A.-C., Stamas, J. (2013). The information-divergence hypothesis of informational masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(3), 2160–2170. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4817875
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Lutfi, R. A., Rodriguez, B., Lee, J., Pastore, T. (2020). A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 148(6), 4014–4024. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0002961
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Lutfi, R. A., Tan, A. Y., Lee, J. (2018). “Modeling individual differences in cocktail-party listening”, special issue. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 104(5), 787–791. https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.919246
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline McLaughlin, D. J., Baese-Berk, M. M., Bent, T., Borrie, S. A., Van Engen, K. J. (2018). Coping with adversity: Individual differences in the perception of noisy and accented speech. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 80(6), 1559–1570. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1537-4
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Oberfeld, D., Klöckner-Nowotny, F. (2016). Individual differences in selective attention predict speech identification as a cocktail party. eLife, 5, e16747. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16747
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Peterson, G. E., Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906875
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Plack, C. J., Barker, D., Prendergast, G. (2014). Perceptual consequences of “hidden” hearing loss. Trends in Hearing, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216514550621
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Ruggles, D., Bharadwaj, H., Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2011). Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(37), 15516–15521. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108912108
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Ruggles, D., Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2011). Spatial selective auditory attention in the presence of reverberant energy: Individual differences in normal-hearing listeners. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 12(3), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-010-0254-z
Google Scholar Swaminathan, J., Mason, C. R., Streeter, T. M., Best, V., Kidd, G. J., Patel, A. D. (2015). Musical training, individual differences and the cocktail party problem. Scientific Reports, 5, 11628. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11628
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Tamati, T. N., Gilbert, J. L., Pisoni, D. B. (2013). Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: A first report. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24(7), 616–634. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.24.7.10
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Wier, C. C., Jesteadt, W., Green, D. M. (1977). Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61(1), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381251
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif