1. Centers for Disease Control . Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders–Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 sites, United States, 2014. MMWR Surveill Summ 2018; 67(6): 1–23.
Google Scholar | Crossref2. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: APA, 2013.
Google Scholar | Crossref3. Sainato, DM, Strain, PS, Lefebvre, D, et al. Facilitating transition times with handicapped preschool children: a comparison between peer-mediated and antecedent prompt procedures. J Appl Behav Anal 1987; 20(3): 285–291.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Brigid Flannery, K, Horner, RH. The relationship between predictability and problem behavior for students with severe disabilities. J Behav Educ 1994; 4: 157–176.
Google Scholar | Crossref5. Mesibov, G, Shea, V, Schopler, E. The TEACCH Approach to Autism Spectrum Disorders. New York, NY: Plenum Publishers, 2005.
Google Scholar6. Schreibman, L, Whalen, C, Stahmer, AC. The use of video priming to reduce disruptive transition behavior in children with autism. J Positive Behav Interventions 2000; 2(1): 3–11.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals7. Schmit, J, Alper, S, Raschke, D, et al. Effects of using a photographic cueing package during routine school transitions with a child who has autism. Ment Retard 2000; 38: 131–137.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Heflin, J, Alaimo, DF. Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Effective Instructional Practices. Austin, TX: Recording for the Blind & Dyslexic, 2007.
Google Scholar9. Scheuermann, B, Webber, J. Autism: Teaching Does Make a Difference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 2002.
Google Scholar10. Sterling-Turner, HE, Jordan, SS. Interventions addressing transition difficulties for individuals with autism. Psychol Sch 2007; 44(7): 681–690.
Google Scholar | Crossref11. Minshew, NJ, Goldstein, G, Siegel, DJ. Neuropsychologic functioning in autism: profile of a complex information processing disorder. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1997; 3(4): 303–316.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Dettmer, S, Simpson, RL, Myles, BS, et al. The use of visual supports to facilitate transitions of students with autism. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabil 2000; 15(3): 163–169.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals13. Banda, DR, Grimmett, E. Enhancing social and transition behaviors of persons with autism through activity schedules: a review. Educ Train Dev Disabil 2008; 43(3): 324–333.
Google Scholar14. Diehl, JJ, Schmitt, LM, Villano, M, et al. The clinical use of robots for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a critical review. Res Autism Spectr Disord 2012; 6(1): 249–262.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI15. Dautenhahn, K, Werry, I. Towards interactive robots in autism therapy. Pragmatics Cogn 2004; 12(1): 1–35.
Google Scholar | Crossref16. Robins, B, Dautenhahn, K, Dubowski, J. Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot? Interact Stud 2006; 7(3): 509–542.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI17. Pierno, AC, Mari, M, Lusher, D, et al. Robotic movement elicits visuomotor priming in children with autism. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46(2): 448–454.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI18. Costescu, CA, Vanderborght, B, David, DO. The effects of robot-enhanced psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. Rev Gen Psychol 2014; 18(2): 127–136.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals19. Shamsuddin, S, Yussof, H, Ismail, LI, et al. Humanoid robot NAO interacting with autistic children of moderately impaired intelligence to augment communication skills. Proced Eng 2012; 41: 1533–1538.
Google Scholar | Crossref20. Jordan, K, King, M, Hellersteth, S, et al. Feasibility of using a humanoid robot for enhancing attention and social skills in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Int J Rehabil Res 2013; 36(3): 221–227.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Pennisi, P, Tonacci, A, Tartarisco, G, et al. Autism and social robotics: a systematic review. Autism Res 2016; 9(2): 165–183.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Begum, M, Serna, RW, Yanco, HA. Are robots ready to deliver autism interventions? A comprehensive review. Int J Soc Rob 2016; 8: 157–181.
Google Scholar | Crossref23. Duquette, A, Michaud, F, Mercier, H. Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism. Auton Robots 2008; 24(2): 147–157.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI24. Feil-Seifer, D, Matarić, MJ. Automated detection and classification of positive vs. negative robot interactions with children with autism using distance-based features. In: 6th ACM/IEEE International conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), Lausanne, Switzerland, : IEEE, 2011, pp. 323–330, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6281351.
Google Scholar | Crossref25. Jafari, N, Adams, KD, Tavakoli, M. Haptics to improve task performance in people with disabilities: a review of previous studies and a guide to future research with children with disabilities. J Rehabil Assistive Tech Eng 2016; 3: 2055668316668147.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals26. Rothschild, LM . Device, System and Method for Mobile Devices to Communicate through Skin Response. Patent 20120218091A1, USA, 2012, https://www.google.com/patents/US20120218091.
Google Scholar27. Gallace, A, Spence, C. The science of interpersonal touch: an overview. Neurosci Biobehavioral Rev 2010; 34(2): 246–259.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Shabani, DB, Katz, RC, Wilder, DA, et al. Increasing social initiations in children with autism: effects of a tactile prompt. J Appl Behav Anal 2002; 35(1): 79–83.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Taylor, BA, Levin, L. Teaching a student with autism to make verbal initiations: effects of a tactile prompt. J Appl Behav Anal 1998; 31(4): 651–654.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Anson, HM, Todd, JT, Cassaretto, KJ. Replacing overt verbal and gestural prompts with unobtrusive covert tactile prompting for students with autism. Behav Res Methods 2008; 40(4): 1106–1110.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Kratochwill, TR, Hitchcock, J, Horner, RH, et al. Single-case Designs Technical Documentation, What Works Clearinghouse, 2010, https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/ReferenceResources/wwc_scd.pdf.
Google Scholar32. Gunther, E . Skinscape: A Tool for Composition in the Tactile Modality, Boston. MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.833.3460&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Google Scholar33. Backman, CL, Harris, SR, Chisholm, J-AM, et al. Single-subject research in rehabilitation: a review of studies using AB, withdrawal, multiple baseline, and alternating treatments designs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78(10): 1145–1153.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. Perdices, M, Tate, RL. Single-subject designs as a tool for evidence-based clinical practice: are they unrecognised and undervalued? Neuropsycholo Rehabil 2009; 19(6): 904–927.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline35. Jacobson, NS, Follette, WC, Revenstorf, D. Psychotherapy outcome research: methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behav Ther 1984; 15(4): 336–352.
Google Scholar | Crossref36. Parker, RI, Vannest, KJ, Brown, L. The improvement rate difference for single-case research. Exceptional Child 2009; 75(2): 135–150.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI37. Wewers, ME, Lowe, NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990; 13(4): 227–236.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI38. Cotton, S, Richdale, A. Brief report: parental descriptions of sleep problems in children with autism, Down syndrome, and Prader-Willi syndrome. Res Dev Disabil 2006; 27(2): 151–161.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline39. Robinson, AM, Richdale, AL. Sleep problems in children with an intellectual disability: parental perceptions of sleep problems, and views of treatment effectiveness. Child Care Health Dev 2004; 30(2): 139–150.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline40. Pérusseau-Lambert, A, Anastassova, M, Boukallel, M, et al. Haptic and tactile interfaces for autism: a systematic review. Enfance 2018; 1: 65–90.
Google Scholar | Crossref41. Law, MC, Baptiste, S, Carswell, A, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 4th ed. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, 2005.
Google Scholar42. Brigid Flannery, K, Horner, RH. The relationship between predictability and problem behavior for students with severe disabilities. J Behav Educ 1994; 4(2): 157–176.
Google Scholar | Crossref43. Majnemer, A . Benefits of early intervention for children with developmental disabilities. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1998; 5(1): 62–69.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline