1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Division of Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention: at a glance, www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/pdf/aag/dhdsp-H.pdf. (2018, accessed 27 April, 2021).
Google Scholar2. Yang, Q, Tong, X, Schieb, L, et al. Vital signs: Recent trends in stroke death rates – United States 2000–2015. Mmwr Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017; 66: 933–939.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Benjamin, EJ, Blaha, MJ, Chiuve, SE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017; 135: e146-603.
Google Scholar | Crossref4. Rosamond, W, Flegal, F, Friday, G, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation 2007; 115: e69–e171.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI5. Robinson, RG, Spalletta, G. Poststroke depression: a review. Can J Psychiatry 2010; 55: 341–349.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI6. Raghavan, P. Upper limb motor impairment post stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2015; 26: 599–610.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Mullick, AA, Sandeep, K, Subramanian, SK. Emerging evidence of the association between cognitive deficits and arm motor recovery after stroke: a meta-analysis. RNN 2015; 33: 389–403.
Google Scholar | Crossref8. Cauraugh, JH, Lodha, H, Naik, SK, et al. Bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress: a structured review and meta-analysis. Human Move Sci 2010; 29: 853–870.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI9. Ausenda, C, Carnovali, M. Transfer of motor skill learning from the healthy hand to the paretic hand in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2011; 47: 417–425.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI10. Laver, KE, George, S, Thomas, S, et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Datab Syst Rev 2017; 1.
Google Scholar11. Laut, J, Porfiri, M, Raghavan, P. The present and future of robotic technology in rehabilitation. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 2016; 4: 312–319.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Roderick, S, Carignan, C. Designing safety-critical rehabilitation robots (Chapter 4). In: Sashi S and Kommu, et al. Rehabilitation Robotics. Vienna, Austria: Itech Education and Publishing, 2007, pp. 648–670.
Google Scholar13. Choi, HS, Shin, WS, Bang, DH, et al. Effects of game-based constraint-induced movement therapy on balance in patients with stroke: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 96: 184–190.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Burdea, G, Polistico, K, Grampurohit, N, et al. Concurrent virtual rehabilitation of service members post-acquired brain injury – a randomized clinical study. In: Proc. 12th ICDVRAT, University of Nottingham, England, 4–6 September 2018.
Google Scholar15. Zeiler, SR, Krakauer, JW. The interaction between training and plasticity in the poststroke brain. Curr Opin Neurol 2013; : 609–616.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Holden, M. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005; 8: 187–211.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Vanderniepen, R, Van Ham, J, Naudet, M, et al. Novel compliant actuator for safe and ergonomic rehabilitation robots – design of a powered elbow orthosis. In: IEEE 10th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, Noordwijk, Netherlands, 13–15 June 2007. pp.790–797, Piscataway: IEEE.
Google Scholar18. Rabin, B, Burdea, G, Roll, D, et al. Integrative rehabilitation of elderly stroke survivors: the design and evaluation of the BrightArm. Disabil Rehab – Assist Tech 2012; 7: 323–335.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. House, G, Burdea, G, Polistico, K, et al. Integrative rehabilitation of stroke survivors in skilled nursing facilities: the design and evaluation of the BrightArm duo. Disabil Rehab – Assist Tech 2016; 11: 683–694.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. House, G, Burdea, G, Polistico, K, et al. BrightArm duo integrative rehabilitation for post-stroke maintenance in skilled nursing facilities. In: Proc. int. conf. virtual rehabilitation, Valencia, Spain, 11–12 June 2015. pp.217–214. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE.
Google Scholar21. Cipresso, P, Chicchi Giglioli, IA, Alcañiz Raya, M, et al. The past, present, and future of virtual and augmented reality research: a network and cluster analysis of the literature. Front Psychol 2018; 9: 20.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Burdea, G, Kim, N, Polistico, K, et al. Assistive game controller for artificial intelligence-enhanced telerehabilitation post-stroke. Assist Tech 2019; 31: 1–12.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Bhattacharjee, S, Al Yami, M, Kurdi, S, et al. Prevalence, patterns and predictors of depression treatment among community-dwelling older adults with stroke in the United States: a cross sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18: 130.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Burdea, G, Polistico, K, Kim, N, et al. Novel therapeutic game controller for telerehabilitation of spastic hands: two case studies. In: Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Virtual Rehabilitation 2019, Tel Aviv Israel, 21–14 July July 2019. 8 pp. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE.
Google Scholar25. Lohse, K, Shirzad, N, Verster, A, et al. Video games and rehabilitation: using design principles to enhance engagement in physical therapy. J Neurol Physiother 2013; 37: 166–175.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI26. Burdea, G, Polistico, K, House, G, et al. Novel integrative virtual rehabilitation reduces symptomatology in primary progressive aphasia – a case study. Int J Neurosci 2015; 125: 949–958. PMID 25485610
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. House, G, Burdea, G, Polistico, K, et al. A rehabilitation first – nursing home tournament between teams of chronic post-stroke residents. Games for Health 2016; 5: 75–83.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Hinderer, SD, Nielsen, J. 234 tips and tricks for recruiting users as participants in usability studies. Fremont, CA: Nielsen Norman Group, 2003.
Google Scholar29. Abts, N. The case for formative human factors testing. Med Device Online, 4 October 2016, www.meddeviceonline.com/doc/the-case-for-formative-human-factors-testing-0001 (accessed 27 April 2021)
Google Scholar30. Lund, AM. Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. STC Usability SIG Newsletter 2001; 8: 2.
Google Scholar31. Sullivan, GM, Artino, AR. Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-Type scales. J Grad Med Ed 2013; 5: 541–542.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline32. Langhan, ML, Riera, A, Kurtz, JC, et al. Implementation of newly adopted technology in acute care settings: a qualitative analysis of clinical staff. J Med Eng Technol 2015; 39: 44–53.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline33. American Congress on Rehabilitation Medicine. The shower bench in the closet: end user acceptance and uptake of rehabilitation technology (600484). Instructional Course . Chicago: Author, 2019.
Google Scholar34. Bonnechère, B, Van Vooren, M, Bier, J-C, et al. The use of mobile games to assess cognitive function of elderly with and without cognitive impairment. JAD 2018; 64: 1285–1293.
Google Scholar | Crossref35. Burdea, G, Polistico, K, Krishnamoorthy, A, et al. Feasibility study of the BrightBrainer™ integrative cognitive rehabilitation system for elderly with dementia. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2015; 10: 421–432.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Ihemedu-Steinke, QC, Rangelova, S, Weber, M, et al. Simulation sickness related to virtual reality driving simulation. In: Proc int conf virtual, augmented and mixed reality, Osaka, Japan, 2017. pp 521–532. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Google Scholar37. Burdea, G, Coiffet, P. Virtual reality technology. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John-Wiley & Sons, 2003.
Google Scholar | Crossref38. Hasomed Solutions for Neurological Rehabilitation , www.hasomed.de/en/home.html (accessed 27 April 2021).
Google Scholar39. Gloreha. Gloreha Workstation Plus .. Product brochure, www.gloreha.com/. (2018, accessed 22 April 2021).
Google Scholar40. Bachmann, D, Weichert, F, Rinkenauer, G. Review of three-dimensional human-computer interaction with focus on the leap motion controller. Sensors (Basel) 2018; 18: 2194.
Google Scholar | Crossref41. Pei, Y-C, Chen, J-L, Wong, AMK, et al. An evaluation of the design and usability of a novel robotic bilateral arm rehabilitation device for patients with stroke. Front Neurorobot 2017; 11: 36.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline42. Burdea G, Kim N, Polistico K, et al. Robotic Table and Serious Games for Integrative Rehabilitation Early Post-Stroke: Two Case Reports. J Rehab Assist Tech. JRAT 26990 Under revision.
Google Scholar43. Gladstone, DJ, Danells, CJ, Black, SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 232–240.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI44. Barreca, SR, Stratford, PW, Lambert, CL, et al. Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chedoke arm and hand activity inventory: a new measure of upper-limb function for survivors of stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1616–1622.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI45. Chesworth, BM, Hamilton, CB, Walton, DM, et al. Reliability and validity of two versions of the upper extremity functional index. Physiother Canada 2014; 66: 243–253.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI