The association between folic acid (FA) and erectile dysfunction (ED) was contradictory in the published original articles, and no meta-analysis was conducted to pool these data.
AimTo verify the role of FA in the pathology of ED and explore the treatment efficacy of FA for ED patients.
MethodsAn extensive search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to obtain all relevant studies published up to October 31, 2020. Studies comparing the serum FA level between ED patients and healthy controls, or comparing the score of the IIEF-5, or IIEF before and after folic acid therapy alone or combination in ED patient were eligible for our meta-analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scales (NOS) was used to qualify included studies.
Main Outcome MeasuresThe standardized mean differences (SMD) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to pool our data.
ResultsNine studies were eligible for our meta-analysis to verify the association between FA and ED, and to explore the treatment efficacy of FA for ED patients. The pooled SMD of the FA level difference between ED patients and healthy subjects was -0.94 (95% CI: -1.59, -0.30, P = .004). Moreover, the level of folic acid in healthy subjects, Mild ED patients, Moderate ED patients and Severe ED patients was 11.847 (95%CI = 9.671, 14.022), 9.496 (95%CI = 8.425, 10.567), 6.597 (95%CI = 5.187, 8.007) and 5.623 (95%CI = 3.535, 7.711) respectively. The SMD of changes in score of IIEF-5 was 1.89 with 95%CI (1.60, 2.17) after FA administration in ED patients. Our analysis also showed that combination therapy of FA plus tadalafil changed the score of IIEF with 0.90 (95%CI = 0.44, 1.36) comparing to combination of placebo plus tadalafil.
ConclusionThis novel meta-analysis demonstrated that FA was an independent risk factor for ED and FA supplement may have potentially positive effects in the treatment of ED patients.
Zhang Y, Zhang W, Dai Y, et al. Serum Folic Acid and Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sex Med 2021;9:100356.
INTRODUCTIONErectile dysfunction is defined as the inability to reach or maintain an erection that is sufficient for sexual performance. Among the general population, 2-40% of men aged 40-69 years are affected by this male sexual dysfunction.2Nicolosi A Glasser DB Kim SC et al.Sexual behaviour and dysfunction and help-seeking patterns in adults aged 40-80 years in the urban population of Asian countries. The prevalence of ED will reach to 322 million men in 2025.3Aytac IA Mckinlay JB Krane RJ. The likely worldwide increase in erectile dysfunction between 1995 and 2025 and some possible policy consequences. It has a significant effect on the quality of life of the patients and their partners.4Hatzimouratidis K Amar E Eardley I et al.Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: Erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Vascular ED is the most important and prevalent subtype of ED owing to the vascular network of the penis.5Virag R Bouilly P Frydman D. Is impotence an arterial disorder? A study of arterial risk factors in 440 impotent men. The risk factors of vascular ED mainly include obesity, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT), dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome (MetS), lack of exercise, and smoking.6Vlachopoulos C Rokkas K Ioakeimidis N et al.Inflammation, metabolic syndrome, erectile dysfunction, and coronary artery disease: Common links. Endothelial dysfunction (EnD) has been found to be a key bridge linking these risk factors and vascular ED.7Shah NP Cainzos-Achirica M Feldman DI et al.Cardiovascular disease prevention in men with vascular erectile dysfunction: The view of the preventive cardiologist.Nitric oxide (NO), released from the endothelial cell had an important role in initiating and maintaining the erection process.8Endothelins & erectile dysfunction. It mediates the penile erection through the cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway.9Scaglione F Donde S Hassan TA et al.Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: Pharmacology and clinical impact of the sildenafil citrate orodispersible tablet formulation. Endothelial cell owns the nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) responsible for formation of NO. So when EnD occurs, it will lead to the reduction of the expression and activity of the eNOS and result in reduced synthesis of NO.10Aversa A Bruzziches R Francomano D et al.Endothelial dysfunction and erectile dysfunction in the aging man. On the contrary, uncoupling of the eNOS could result in the reduction of NO in the endothelial tissue and thus causes EnD.11Abdel Aziz MT Motawi T Rezq A et al.Effects of a water-soluble curcumin protein conjugate vs. pure curcumin in a diabetic model of erectile dysfunction.Folic acid (FA), is found to have important role in the metabolism of NO by initially inverting NOS uncoupling.12Folate and homocysteine metabolism in neural plasticity and neurodegenerative disorders.,13Stoll S NejatyJahromy Y Woodward JJ et al.Nitric oxide synthase stabilizes the tetrahydrobiopterin cofactor radical by controlling its protonation state. It has proved the level of FA was related to EnD.14Hoch AZ Lynch SL Jurva JW et al.Folic acid supplementation improves vascular function in amenorrheic runners. So, several studies concentrate on the relationship between serum level of FA and ED considering the relation between EnD and ED. To verify the role of FA in the pathology of ED, two type of clinical researches were conducted including comparing the level of FA between ED and healthy subjects and comparing the score of the briefed International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) before and after the FA administration. But totally contradictory conclusions were drawn by the authors. Many studies have shown that patients with ED had lower level of FA comparing to the healthy subjects. However, several studies didn't support this opinion. These studies enrolled small sample, making the conclusion less convincing. Therefore, we conduct this systematic review and meta‐analysis to provide more solid evidence by synthesizing the limited data. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta‐analysis to explore the role of FA in the pathology of ED. Two type of meta-analyses are included in our meta-analysis: 1 comparing the serum FA between ED patients and healthy subjects, and the other comparing the IIEF-5 changes before and after FA administration.There were different conclusions on the role of FA on ED etiology, and less was known to the treatment efficacy of FA on ED patients. We perform this meta-analysis to investigate the questions: If serum FA level was different between ED patients and healthy subjects and it decreased significantly with the severity of ED, If FA had potential positive treatment effects for ED patients?
MATERIAS AND METHODSWe performed this systematic review and meta‐analysis under the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement.15Moher D Liberati A Tetzlaff J et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. This meta-analysis was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the ID CRD42020220761. No ethic problems were involved in our meta-analysis, no approval from the Medical Ethics Committee was needed. Literature Search StrategiesAn extensive search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to obtain all relevant studies published up to October 31, 2020 without any restrictions. We performed the search using the combination of the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms: folic acid (MeSH) and erectile dysfunction (MeSH). The search strategies were adjusted according to the demands of the used databases. To obtain extra publications, we screened all references of the potentially relevant studies meeting the pre-set inclusion criteria. The literature searching process was conducted by two authors (Yuyang Zhang, Wei Zhang) independently to avoid missing useful publications.
Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaAll studies could be enrolled if they comprised all the following criteria: 1) reporting subjects older than 18 years old; 2) comparing the serum folic acid level between ED patients and healthy controls, or comparing the score of the IIEF-5 before and after folic acid therapy in ED patients; 3) reporting quantitative data for the related outcomes; 4) using a validated instrument for the diagnosis of ED. Studies were excluded if they didn't show related outcomes with quantitative data. Of course, reviews, animal experiments, case reports, comments, editorials letters and congress were all excluded.
Data Extraction and Quality AssessmentTwo authors assessed quality and extracted the data of the included studies using the predesigned form independently. A consensus was hold to resolve the conflicts raised by the two authors.
As for the studies evaluating the folic acid level between the ED patients and healthy subjects, the following data were extracted from each included study: first author, study year, study country, definition of ED, number of ED patients/healthy subjects, the folic acid level between the ED patients and healthy subjects. If the study was related to comparing the score of the IIEF-5 before and after folic acid therapy in ED patients, the data were extracted from the original study including, first author, study year, follow-up months, doses of the FA, number of the study and the IIEF-5 before and after the FA administration.
The quality of the case-control study and the cohort study were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scales (NOS).16Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Studies were scored through the following categories, selection process, comparability of cohorts and the outcomes ascertainment.Studies of moderate to high quality was defined with the NOS score 5-9 in our meta-analysis.
Outcome Measures and Statistical AnalysisThe first outcome of interest in our meta-analysis was to compare the folic acid level between the ED patients and healthy subjects. The standardized mean differences (SMD) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to evaluate the relationship. The second outcome of interest in our meta-analysis was to compare the score of the IIEF-5 before and after folic acid therapy in ED patients. And the results were showed using the same data indicators.
Data analysis was performed with Stata software (version 16.0; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) and Open Meta-Analyst (completely open-source, funding from AHRQ, grant number: R01HS018574). The statistical significance of the pooled results existed when the P value < 0.05 of the Z tests. When synthesizes the data of the included studies, the Q test or I2 value were calculated for evaluating the heterogeneity. Fixed-effect model or random-effect model was chose owing to the heterogeneity. If the I2 <50% or p >0.05, we used the fixed-effect model considering no obvious heterogeneity among the studies. Otherwise, the random-effect model was used considering the high heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis or sensitivity analysis were performed when the heterogeneity existed to find the source of it. Each study was eliminated once at a time to assess the influence of the eliminated study to the pooled results. In order to detect the bias of publication, the Begg's test were used. There were bias of publication when the P value <0.05.
DISCUSSIONThis comprehensive study confirmed that serum FA was correlated with ED and the serum FA decreased significantly with the severity of ED. Moreover, our study demonstrated that FA administration could improve the score of IIEF-5 in ED patients. When comparing the FA between ED patients and healthy subjects, we enrolled 6 studies with 982 ED patients and 860 healthy subjects, which all were regarded as high-quality literature using NOS quality scores. It is regretful that we only enrolled 3 studies when comparing the IIEF-5, or IIEF changes before and after FA administration. But the conclusions were consistent to the relationship between FA and ED. We conducted the first meta-analysis to date to demonstrate the role of FA in the pathology of ED.
The EnD was correlated with the pathogenesis of ED significantly. So, a number of studies concentrated on exploring the laboratory factors in the pathogenesis of ED, which including serum testosterone level, serum vitamin D level, and platelet indices, resulting in ED owing to the destruction of the endothelial function.26Wei Y Chen P Chen Q et al.Serum vitamin D levels and erectile dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis., 27Platelet indices and erectile dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis., 28Zhu J Zhang W Ou N et al.Do testosterone supplements enhance response to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors in men with erectile dysfunction and hypogonadism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Recently, several studies have found that the FA supplementation could improve the endothelial function in patients with DM and hypertension.29Titlea LM Urb E Giddensa K et al.Folic acid improves endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes—An effect independent of homocysteine-lowering.,30High-dose folic acid supplementation effects on endothelial function and blood pressure in hypertensive patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. A new question was raised by the researchers that whether deficiency of FA could lead to the occurrence of ED. Several prospective studies were conducted to compare the FA level between ED patients and healthy subjects and compare the FA level of different severity of ED divided by the score of IIEF-5. Wen‑Jie Yan conducted the first study to investigate the relationship between FA and ED. They demonstrated that ED patients had lower serum FA concentrations (7.61 ± 3.97 ng/ml) than that in healthy subjects (12.23 ± 5.76 ng/ml).17Yan WJ Yu N Yin TL et al.A new potential risk factor in patients with erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation: Folate deficiency. They also found the positive correlation between the FA level and IIEF-5 scores (r = 0.589). On the contrary, another study didn't find any association between FA and ED, of course the FA level and the severity of ED.20Association between homocysteine, vitamin B 12, folic acid and erectile dysfunction: A cross-sectional study in China. Actually, this study was the first and the only one to conclude the no significant correlation between FA and ED. When synthesizing all the data published with large study population, we concluded the positive correlation between FA and ED, also the negative correlation between FA level and severity of ED.FA had important role in the metabolism of NO and homocysteine (Hcys).12Folate and homocysteine metabolism in neural plasticity and neurodegenerative disorders.,31Stoll S NejatyJahromy Y Woodward JJ et al.Nitric oxide synthase stabilizes the tetrahydrobiopterin cofactor radical by controlling its protonation state. The FA was related to the metabolism of Hcys through remethylating it to methionine.17Yan WJ Yu N Yin TL et al.A new potential risk factor in patients with erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation: Folate deficiency. However, hyperhomocysteine has been found to be a novel risk factor for ED owing to its inhibitory effect on endothelium-dependent NO formation.32Hyperhomocysteinemia and endothelial dysfunction. So many studies concluded that FA deficiency resulted in the occurrence of ED by decreasing the metabolism of Hcys, leading to the hyperhomocysteine. This phenomenon seemed to explain the relationship between FA and ED. However, another well-designed study raised a different perspective. No correlation between FA and hyperhomocysteine was found by their study in ED group (r = -0.247, P = .197) and control group (r = -0.163, P = .372) respectively(19). The FA should be an independent risk factor for ED.Another way involved in the causation of ED by FA was the tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), essential for the synthesis of NO.13Stoll S NejatyJahromy Y Woodward JJ et al.Nitric oxide synthase stabilizes the tetrahydrobiopterin cofactor radical by controlling its protonation state. FA was responsible for the deficiency of BH4. Chemical studies concluded that BH4 was the co-factor of the eNOS. The structural integrity of the Endothelial eNOS was necessary for the formation of NO. So, FA deficiency was responsible for BH4 deficiency, which was responsible for the uncoupling of the eNOS. These pathways could explain our conclusion that FA deficiency was responsible for the causation of ED and FA level decreased following the ED severity increased.In order to further investigate the influence of FA administration in IIEF-5 score in ED patients, several studies were conducted to compare the IIEF-5 changes in ED patients after the FA administration. They all concluded a highly significant increase of IIEF-5 after FA administration (20 vs 12, 15.5 vs 6.4 respectively).23Agostini R Rossi F Pajalich R. Myoinositol/folic acid combination for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in type 2 diabetes men: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.,24Elshahid ARM Shahein IM Mohammed YF et al.Folic acid supplementation improves erectile function in patients with idiopathic vasculogenic erectile dysfunction by lowering peripheral and penile homocysteine plasma levels: A case-control study. After pooling the data, the conclusion was consistent. Interestingly, one study of the two further compared the Hcys level before and after FA administration (0.36 vs 0.15, P29Titlea LM Urb E Giddensa K et al.Folic acid improves endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes—An effect independent of homocysteine-lowering.,33Stroes ESG Faassen EE Yo M et al.Folic acid reverts dysfunction of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. But the positive role of FA in the treatment of ED couldn't be verified from our meta-analysis. First, only 3 studies were included in our meta-analysis. Second, the improvement of IIEF-5 or IIEF before and after folic acid administration could be driven by large sample size. It didn't meet the bar for clinical significance to ED therapy. So future researches are needed to explore the treatment efficacy of FA for ED patients.Ali Hamidi Madani et al conducted a randomized controlled trial to investigate that if the combination with FA plus tadalafil could improve the IIEF scores more efficient than placebo plus tadalafil in ED patients with type 2 DM. After three-month follow up, the group with FA plus tadalafil accomplished larger changes of IIEF than that in group B with placebo plus tadalafil (5.14 ± 3.84 vs 1.68 ± 0.99, P = .001).25Hamidi Madani A Asadolahzade A Mokhtari G et al.Assessment of the efficacy of combination therapy with folic acid and tadalafil for the management of erectile dysfunction in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study further confirmed the efficacy of FA in therapy of ED, even in ED with DM. The etiology of ED in DM patients is multifactorial. However, the deficiency of NO was the prominent factor of ED patients with DM.34Tejada IS Goldstein I Azadzoi K et al.Impaired neurogenic and endothelium-mediated relaxation of penile smooth muscle from diabetic men with impotence. So, FA could restore endothelial function by increasing the NO availability. Actually, another supplement, arginine could treat ED with the same pathway.35Chang Rhim H Kim MS Park Y-J et al.The potential role of arginine supplements on erectile dysfunction: A systemic review and meta-analysis. It played an important role in the NO-producing pathway. Although the first-line treatment for ED was phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 5 enzymes. It is potential to prescribe tadalafil plus FA for ED patients, without severe adverse effects.Among included studies, Attia et al conducted a prospective study to compare the FA level between ED patients and healthy controls. Worthwhile, the control group in their study contained 30 healthy subjects with age 54.00 ± 9.73 elder than that in ED group. But it couldn't influence the conclusion of our meta-analysis. Abhimanyu et al have verified no correlation between FA level and age (r = 0.138, P = .389). Another study conducted by Massimiliano et al also demonstrated that FA level was unrelated to the age (r = 0.225. P = .290). So the difference of age between ED patients and healthy subjects couldn't influence the results of our study.
When an ED patient referred to an andrologist, he would be checked for serum testosterone, sugar, and lipid for looking for reversible risk factors. Our meta-analysis could remind the andrologist that low FA level would be a risk factor for ED patients, worthy for checking to find the etiology of ED. Moreover, our conclusion could also supply a novel therapy choice for ED besides PDE5i only.
Our meta-analysis has some limitations. We only included three studies when evaluating the FA treatment efficacy for ED. But we are the first one to explore the role of FA in the pathology and therapy of ED. We included enough studies to verify the association between FA and ED. More well-designed randomized controlled studies were needed for assessing the treatment efficacy of FA for ED. Secondly, our study had higher heterogeneity. In order to solve the heterogeneity of enrolled studies, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted. Partial heterogeneity could be attribute to subgroup. Other reason responsible for the heterogeneity included sample size, patients age, duration of ED. Last but not least, the diagnosis of ED was based on the questionnaire of IIEF-5 instead of clinical investigation such as RigiScan, penile Doppler ultrasonography. Several strengths of our meta-analysis make our study worthwhile to be conducted. First, our study was the first meta-analysis to verify the relationship between FA and ED. Second, we included larger sample to provide more convincing evidence than each original research with small sample size. But, more prospective studies are needed in the future to make up the limitations of our review studies.
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIPYuyang Zhang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal Analysis, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Project Administration; Wei Zhang: Methodology, Software, Formal Analysis, Writing – Review & Editing; Yutian Dai: Software, Writing – Review & Editing, Project Administration; Hui Jiang: Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing, Project Administration; Xiansheng Zhang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition.
Article InfoPublication HistoryPublished online: May 26, 2021
Accepted: March 13, 2021
Received: January 5, 2021
FootnotesConflict of Interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Funding: This work received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 8207061072 ).
IdentificationDOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100356
CopyrightCopyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the International Society for Sexual Medicine.
User License Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) | ScienceDirectAccess this article on ScienceDirect
留言 (0)