Health literacy refers to the ability of individuals to access and understand basic health information and services, and to use this information and services to make good decisions to maintain and promote their health (1). Domestic and foreign scholars intervene in people’s health literacy based on the theories of “knowledge, attitude and practice model” (a set of behavioral intervention models through the acquisition of knowledge, attitude change and behavior formation) and “health belief model” (this model believes that when individuals have sufficient health beliefs, they will take corresponding health behaviors) (2, 3). In order to further improve people’s health literacy, research on the theoretical framework and assessment tools of health literacy has gradually increased in recent years, especially the research on health literacy of special populations has received increasing attention (4, 5). The 14th Five-Year National Health Plan points out that health problems and influencing factors should be comprehensively intervened to further improve the health literacy level of residents (6). As the main force of national and social development, college students’ health literacy level has an important impact on the health literacy level of residents. After the COVID-19 pandemic, the government has paid more attention to improving the health literacy level of students. Therefore, the Ministry of Education proposed the implementation of the National Healthy Schools Construction Plan (7).
Previous studies have reported the problems related to health literacy of college students (8, 9), and there is a large gap in the health literacy level of college students. Low health literacy means low awareness and ability to seek health information. Such college students often have health problems such as smoking, low self-esteem, loneliness and so on (10, 11). There are also rich related studies on health literacy of college students in western medicine colleges (12, 13), but there are few studies on the health literacy of college students in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), which limits the colleges of TCM to develop accurate plans or implement health promotion activities to improve the health literacy level of students. In 2021, a TCM college conducted an eHealth literacy survey on 1,007 undergraduates, and the results showed that the level of eHealth literacy of college students of TCM was low (14). Compared with western medicine colleges and universities, TCM colleges and universities have unique advantages, they pay more attention to health care services and advocate “preventive treatment of disease” (15), which is in line with the concept of “Healthy China” (6). Therefore, it is necessary to carry out the research on the status of health literacy of students in TCM colleges and universities and explore the influencing factors of health literacy. This study conducted a sampling survey of college students in a TCM university in Shandong Province, in order to explore the health literacy level and related influencing factors of college students in TCM, so as to provide reference for carrying out targeted health literacy promotion and healthy school construction in the future.
2 Materials and methods 2.1 Study area and periodThis study was conducted from December 2022 to March 2023 in a TCM university in Shandong Province, China.
2.2 Study design and participantsThe convenience sampling method was used to select undergraduates in a TCM university in Shandong Province as the research object for a cross-sectional study. Inclusion criteria: ① Undergraduate; ② Age ≥ 18 years old. Exclusion criteria: ① those who did not complete the questionnaire or withdrew during the course. ② too long or too short time to answer the questionnaire (according to −x ± s, < 219.62 s or > 1062.51 s); ③ There were obvious regularity or abnormal values in the content of the questionnaire. The purpose and significance of the study were explained to the subjects before the study, and the investigation was conducted after obtaining the consent of the subjects.
2.3 Measures 2.3.1 Questionnaire surveyThe electronic questionnaire was used to conduct the survey. The related questions of the self-designed questionnaire came from the “Health literacy of Chinese citizens - Basic knowledge and Skills (2015 edition)” (16) and the “National Residents’ Health literacy Questionnaire” prepared by the China Health Education Center (17). The questionnaire included two parts: general information of the respondents and questions related to health literacy. The present study was modified appropriately in terms of demographics. Health literacy related issues can be divided into three aspects: basic knowledge and concept, healthy lifestyle and behavior, and health skills. According to the public health problems, health literacy can be divided into six types of health problems: scientific health concept, infectious disease prevention, chronic disease prevention, safety and first aid, basic medical care and health information (17). There were 51 questions in this survey. The judgment questions and single-choice questions were scored 1 point per question, the multiple-choice questions were scored 2 points per question, and the wrong answers or underanswers were scored 0 points, with a total score of 65 points. According to the criterion of health literacy, if the score of the questionnaire reaches 80% or more of the total score (≥48 points), it can be considered to have health literacy, and the criterion of literacy level of three aspects and six types of questions also reaches 80% or more of the total score of this aspect (17).
2.3.2 SettingThe questionnaire was developed by the China Health Education Center commissioned by the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China and used to survey the health literacy level of residents in China. It has high authority and has been widely used. The Cronbach’s α coefficient is 0.82–0.931, and the split-half reliability is 0.808–0.81 (18, 19), which has good reliability and validity. The topic comes from the content of health literacy of Chinese citizens, and the health literacy of college students is investigated from different aspects, which is targeted and comprehensive. This study used the “Questionnaire Star” (online questionnaire survey platform) to conduct the survey, before distributing the questionnaire to the research subjects to explain the purpose and significance of the study, to obtain the consent of the research subjects after the distribution of the questionnaire, each person can only fill in the questionnaire once, and complete all questions before submission. In the data processing stage, unqualified questionnaires with short or long response time (according to −x ± s, < 219.62 s or > 1062.51 s), regular responses or abnormal values were eliminated, and the data were checked by two investigators and entered.
2.3.3 Data analysesAn electronic questionnaire survey was conducted and a database was formed. SPSS 22.0 software was used for data processing and analysis. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to analyze the general data of the respondents, chi-square test was used to compare the count data between groups, and Logistic regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of health literacy. The test level α = 0.05.
3 Results 3.1 Participants’ characteristicsA total of 1,092 electronic questionnaires were collected in this survey, of which 925 were valid questionnaires, with an effective recovery rate of 84.7%. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the questionnaire in this study was 0.873, and the Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.799. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was good. Males accounted for 26.81% and females accounted for 73.19%. In terms of majors, the major was medicine, accounting for 70.70%; most of the students were not the only child (73.19%), and their close relatives were not engaged in the medical profession (83.24%). The parents’ educational background was generally low, high school or below accounted for 74.59 and 78.92%, respectively. 66.38% of college students had normal body mass index (BMI). Most of the college students never smoked (94.05%), and 78.05% of them were aware of the concept of “health literacy” (see Table 1 for details).
Table 1. General characteristics of participants (n = 925).
3.2 Overall level of health literacyThe overall possession rate of health literacy was 57.30%. Among the three aspects of health literacy, the possession rates of college students’ basic knowledge and concept literacy, healthy lifestyle and behavior literacy, and basic skills literacy were 53.62, 65.41, and 58.70%, respectively, and the basic knowledge and concept literacy was the lowest. Among the six types of health literacy questions, college students had the highest literacy rate of scientific health concept, which was 79.68%. The awareness rate of infectious disease prevention and treatment was the lowest (40.86%). The awareness rate of chronic disease prevention and control literacy was 60.11%. The rate of safety and first aid literacy was 72.86%; the rate of basic medical literacy was 61.30%; the rate of health information literacy was 61.62% (see Figure 1 for details).
Figure 1. Overall level of health literacy, three aspects and six types of problems (n = 925).
3.3 Single factor analysis of influencing factors of health literacy levelThe analysis results showed that the overall level of health literacy of college students was significantly related to gender (χ2 = 30.99, p < 0.001), grade (χ2 = 17.85, p < 0.001), major (χ2 = 5.65, p = 0.017), smoking (χ2 = 24.23, p < 0.001) and being aware of the concept of “health literacy” (χ2 = 7.73, p = 0.005) were statistically significant. The three aspects and six kinds of problems of health literacy of college students in the TCM university shows the following characteristics: females students are higher than males students, students of Han Chinese have higher literacy level, sophomore students have the lowest literacy level, medical students have higher literacy level, students with too much or too little living expenses have lower literacy level, students who never smoked have higher literacy level, and students who know the concept of “health literacy” have higher literacy level. The details are shown in Tables 2, 3.
Table 2. Single factor analysis of influencing factors of health literacy level [cases (%)].
Table 3. Single factor analysis of influencing factors of three aspects and six types of problems levels of health literacy [cases (%)].
3.4 Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of health literacyTaking health literacy as the dependent variable and the influencing factors (gender, grade, major, smoking, and being aware of the concept of “health literacy”) with statistical significance in univariate analysis as the independent variables, Logistic regression analysis was conducted on the influencing factors of health literacy level. The results showed that females had a 92% more odds of higher health literacy than males (AOR: 1.92; 95%CI: 1.40–2.62). The health literacy level of sophomores was 0.62 times that of freshmen (AOR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.41–0.95) and seniors had a 102% more odds of higher health literacy than freshmen (AOR: 2.02; 95%CI: 1.01–4.05). College students who never smoked had a 199% more odds of higher health literacy than among former or current smokers (AOR: 2.99; 95%CI: 1.57–5.72). College students who were aware of the concept of “health literacy” had a 54% more odds of higher health literacy than those who were not aware (AOR: 1.54; 95%CI: 1.11–2.13) (see Table 4).
Table 4. Logistic regression analysis of influencing factors of health literacy of college students.
4 Discussion 4.1 The overall level of health literacy of students in universities of TCM is relatively highThis study shows that the overall level of health literacy of college students in this TCM university is 57.30%, which is significantly higher than the level of health literacy of Chinese residents in 2021 (25.40%) (20). It is also higher than the health literacy level of college students in a survey in the United States in 2020 (49%) (21), 20 universities in China in 2020 (41.7%) (22), and 5 universities in Shaanxi Province in China in 2022 (39.2%) (23). Compared with other medical colleges and universities, the overall level of health literacy of college students in this study is also relatively high (24, 25), but it is lower than the health literacy level of college students in a university in Denmark in 2020 (59.9%) (8). Analysis of previous studies found that women’s health literacy was generally higher than that of men (10, 21, 23), and the proportion of women in this study (73.19%) was higher, which may lead to the improvement of the overall level of health literacy. Generally speaking, the higher the economic level, the higher the attention to health (11). Social culture may also affect the level of health literacy, and studies have shown that women have lower health literacy in patriarchal societies (11). In addition, medical students generally have higher health literacy than non-medical students (10, 11).
4.2 To improve the health literacy level of students in TCM colleges and universities according to the influencing factorsFrom the analysis of three aspects of health literacy, the healthy lifestyle and behavior literacy level of college students of TCM was the highest (65.41%), suggesting that although the lifestyle of college students of TCM has changed due to the medical atmosphere in school or the impact of COVID-19 pandemic (10, 26), the basic knowledge and concepts and health skills have not been improved. It shows that college students of TCM need to consolidate their theory and skills training, and integrate knowledge and practice. The results showed that males students, sophomore students, non-medical major, high or low monthly living expenses, ever or current smoking, and unawareness of the concept of “health literacy” were the negative factors for the three aspects of health literacy. The healthy lifestyle and behavior literacy level of students with monthly living expenses ≤500 (26.32%) is even lower than that of national residents in 2021 (28.05%) (20). Personal economic level may affect their own health care access and use (11), suggesting that schools should focus on these students, form targeted intervention programs according to the “knowledge, attitude and practice” model, carry out health literacy related courses or practical activities, popularize medical knowledge and skills to non-medical students, increase efforts to publicize the disadvantages of smoking and strictly implement smoking cessation control. Schools or society should provide subsidies to students with life difficulties, and improve their health literacy level as soon as possible. According to the analysis of the six questions of health literacy, the literacy level of infectious disease prevention and treatment among college students of TCM was the lowest (40.86%), which was lower than that of students in a western medicine university (45.5%) (25). Perhaps due to the differences in curriculum and philosophy between Chinese and western medicine universities, the awareness of disinfection and isolation of students in TCM universities was weaker than that of students in western medicine universities. It may also be related to the lack of education related to the prevention and control of infectious diseases in schools, and students are less faced with the prevention and control of infectious diseases and lack of practical combat experience (25), suggesting that this aspect is the deficiency of college students in TCM colleges and universities. Schools should strengthen the education of infectious disease prevention and control among students and carry out exercises to improve their health literacy level.
Logistic regression analysis showed that gender, grade, smoking, and being aware of the concept of “health literacy” were significantly associated factors affecting the level of health literacy of TCM college students. The health literacy level of females is almost twice that of males, which is consistent with the higher health literacy level of females in the 2022 survey results of the health literacy level of students in 5 colleges and universities in Shaanxi Province of China (23) which may be related to females’ more active attention to health information. However, the results of the health literacy survey of undergraduates in a university in Nepal in 2021 showed that females were 1.6 times more likely to have poor health literacy than males (11), which may be related to the regional economic level, social culture, school differences, professional curriculum Settings, etc. The health literacy level of non-smoking undergraduates is almost three times higher than that of former or current smokers. A cross-sectional survey of health literacy of students in a public university in northern Jordan also showed that non-smoking students have higher health literacy level (10), which may be related to non-smoking students’ strong self-restraint and more emphasis on their own health (27). Therefore, it is necessary to implement more effective tobacco control measures in schools. A survey on the intention and behavior of tobacco control among college students in 12 universities in China found that improving the performance expectation, effort expectation and eHealth literacy of non-smoking college students and creating a positive social environment can improve the tobacco control behavior of college students (27), and the measures taken by this school provide a reference. The health literacy level of senior students is higher than that of freshman students, which is consistent with the research results of undergraduate health literacy of 10 universities in Tianjin, China in 2021 (28), mainly due to the fact that senior students have more knowledge reserve, social ability and personal experience. However, the results of this survey show that the health literacy level of sophomore students is slightly lower than that of freshman students, which is not consistent with the research expectation. The analysis may be related to the sample size, and may also be due to the fact that freshman students have just entered the university and still maintain a strong sense of self-discipline and health awareness (29). Students who are aware of the concept of “health literacy” have a higher level of health literacy, which may be due to their strong willingness and ability to obtain health information, and they can actively collect health-related information from friends, newspapers, and the Internet (29). This indicates that schools need to set up health resources reasonably, carry out health education related activities and courses in a diversified way (30), form a new interdisciplinary talent training paradigm, and improve the health literacy level of college students.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the health literacy level and influencing factors of students in TCM colleges and universities in China, which provides a reference for researchers to explore the reasonable setting of health resources, carry out health education related activities and courses, and improve the health literacy level of students in TCM colleges and universities.
4.3 LimitationsThe limitations of this study mainly include: firstly, this study was conducted in only one TCM college and the sample was not very representative. Second, due to the limitation of time and cost, the sampling method is a convenience sampling method, which may have errors. Although in order to reduce the bias caused by convenient sampling, researchers selected research subjects from different grades and classes as much as possible, collected demographic characteristics data, and analyzed the composition of the sample. Therefore, future researchers should conduct multi-center research with stratified random sampling method, and carry out effective intervention strategies to improve the health literacy level of college students.
5 ConclusionCompared with previous studies, the health literacy level of 925 students in TCM colleges was above the middle level. The healthy lifestyle and behavior literacy of students in TCM colleges is better than knowledge and skill literacy, which is a separation phenomenon of knowledge and practice. Gender, grade, smoking status and awareness of the concept of “health literacy” were important factors affecting the level of health literacy. The results of this study and the analysis of influencing factors can provide reference for TCM colleges and universities to improve health education activities or curriculum, help to improve the health literacy level of students in TCM colleges and universities, give full play to the professional characteristics of TCM colleges and universities, and promote the construction of healthy schools.
Data availability statementThe raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statementThe requirement of ethical approval was waived by the Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine for the studies involving humans because Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributionsJZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CL: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YY: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. RuY: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. RaY: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. MJ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing.
FundingThe author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statementThe authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s noteAll claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References1. Bandura, A, Caprara, GV, Barbaranelli, C, Gerbino, M, and Pastorelli, C. Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy in diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning. Child Dev. (2003) 74:769–82. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00567
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
2. Grové, C, Marinucci, A, and Riebschleger, J. Development of an American and Australian co-designed youth mental health literacy program. Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2023) 1:1018173. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2022.1018173
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
3. Seangpraw, K, Ong-Artborirak, P, Boonyathee, S, Bootsikeaw, S, Kantow, S, Panta, P, et al. Effect of health literacy intervention on glycemic control and renal function among Thai older adults at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Interv Aging. (2023) 18:1465–76. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S413456
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
4. Wang, Y, Xu, X, and Zhang, F. Construction of a theoretical framework of maternal mental health literacy based on the grounded theory. J Nurs Sci. (2024) 39:82–6. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2024.15.082
Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
5. Lee, EH, Lee, YW, Lee, KW, Nam, M, and Kim, SH. A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: development and psychometric evaluation. Int J Nurs Stud. (2018) 88:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
8. Bak, CK, Krammer, J, Dadaczynski, K, Orkan, O, von Seelen, J, Prinds, C, et al. Digital health literacy and information-seeking behavior among university college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study from Denmark. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:3676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063676
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
10. Rababah, JA, Al-Hammouri, MM, Drew, BL, and Aldalaykeh, M. Health literacy: exploring disparities among college students. BMC Public Health. (2019) 19:1401. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7781-2
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
11. Bhusal, S, Paudel, R, Gaihre, M, Paudel, K, Adhikari, TB, and Pradhan, PMS. Health literacy and associated factors among undergraduates: a university-based cross-sectional study in Nepal. PLoS Glob Public Health. (2021) 1:e0000016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000016
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
12. Pourfridoni, M, Khan, MA, Daneshi, S, Vazirinasab, H, Nosrati, Z, and Daneshi-Maskooni, M. Health literacy and fear among Iranian medical students due to COVID-19: an observational study. Brain Behav. (2022) 12:e2586. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2586
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
14. Xu, J, Miao, Y, Fan, Y, and Liu, J. Study on the current situation and influencing factors of E-health literacy among collegians in traditional Chinese medicine universities. Health Vocat Educ. (2023) 41:121–4. doi: 10.20037/j.issn.1671-1246.2023.05.36
Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
15. Wu, DY, Hou, XT, Xia, ZS, Hao, EW, Xie, JL, Liang, JY, et al. Analysis on oral medication rules of traditional Chinese medicine prescriptions for prevention of COVID-19. Chin Herb Med. (2021) 13:502–17. doi: 10.1016/j.chmed.2021.10.007
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
17. Nie, X, Li, Y, and Li, L. Statistic analysis of 2012 Chinese residents health literacy monitoring. Chin J Health Educ. (2014) 30:178–81. doi: 10.16168/j.cnki.issn.1002-9982.2014.02.021
Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
18. Du, X, Han, T, Jing, C, and Zhuang, R. Construction and verification of the National Residents' health literacy surveillance rapid assessment questionnaire (HLSRAQ). Health Educ Health Promot. (2019) 14:310–3. doi: 10.16117/j.cnki.31-1974/r.201904007
Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
19. Li, Y, Mao, Q, Shi, Q, Tao, M, Nie, X, Li, L, et al. The level of health literacy of Chinese residents in 2012: surveillance results. Chin J Health Educ. (2015) 31:99–103. doi: 10.16168/j.cnki.issn.1002-9982.2015.02.001
Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
21. Patil, U, Kostareva, U, Hadley, M, Manganello, JA, Okan, O, Dadaczynski, K, et al. Health literacy, digital health literacy, and COVID-19 pandemic attitudes and behaviors in U.S. college students: implications for interventions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:3301. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063301
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
22. Li, S, Cui, G, Kaminga, AC, Cheng, S, and Xu, H. Associations between health literacy, eHealth literacy, and COVID-19-related health behaviors among Chinese college students: cross-sectional online study. J Med Internet Res. (2021) 23:e25600. doi: 10.2196/25600
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
23. Wu, S, Shao, B, and Wang, G. Health literacy among university students in Shaanxi Province of China: a cross-sectional study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. (2023) 16:865–78. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S407113
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
24. Vamos, S, Lee, T, Kang, HB, and Vamos, CA. COVID-19 and college students: health literacy experiences and training needs. J Am Coll Heal. (2023) 71:2462–9. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1970568
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
25. Wu, Y, Cao, W, and Xu, S. Study on the correlation between health literacy and health behavior: taking a medical College in Shanghai as an example. Health Vocat Educ. (2024) 42:63–7. doi: 10.20037/j.issn.1671-1246.2024.08.19
Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
26. Tang, K, and Liang, H. Lifestyle choices in the post-epidemic era. J Harbin Inst Technol. (2021) 23:50–7. doi: 10.16822/j.cnki.hitskb.2021.01.008
Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
27. Ma, Y, Zhou, M, Yu, W, Zou, Z, Ge, P, Ma, ZF, et al. Using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) and e-health literacy (e-HL) to investigate the tobacco control intentions and behaviors of non-smoking college students in China: a cross-sectional investigation. BMC Public Health. (2023) 23:765. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15644-5
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
28. Li, X. Health literacy and its influencing factors among college students in Tianjin in 2021. Chin J Prevent Control Chronic Dis. (2023) 31:66–70. doi: 10.16386/j.cjpccd.issn.1004-6194.2023.01.015
Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
29. Wang, Y, Hu, Q, Liu, R, Zhang, H, and Chen, J. Analysis on the status and influencing factors of health literacy of college students in Chengdu and Chongqing medical colleges. J Chengdu Med Col. (2022) 17:371–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2257.2022.03.021
Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
30. Yang, HF, Chang, CC, Tseng, PL, Lai, HR, Tasi, JS, Huang, WH, et al. Effectiveness of innovative instructional module for professional competence in health literacy in medical students. BMC Med Educ. (2022) 22:210. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03252-7
留言 (0)