Improved understanding of the factors that underlie immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response and toxicity are needed as only half of patients with metastatic melanoma respond, and 10-40% experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Modifying the gut microbiome could positively affect response to ICIs and reduce toxicities. Here, we sought to determine if the pre-treatment gut microbiome predicts ICI response or toxicity in the setting of metastatic melanoma. Melanoma patients (n=88) over 18 years of age, planning to receive ICI therapy enrolled in a prospective observational cohort study at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Skin Cancer Clinic. Patients taking corticosteroids for indications other than adrenal physiologic replacement were excluded. Stools were collected at baseline, within 10 days of an irAE as determined by CTCAE v 5.0 criteria, and at 12 weeks. ICI response and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated q12 weeks using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). Metagenomic whole-genome shotgun sequencing of the microbiome was classified using MetaPhlAn4/HUMAnN3 and differential abundance analyzed with ANCOM-BC2. Of the 88 patients enrolled, 41 had metastatic disease and complete data. There were 25 participants classified as responders, defined as having complete response or partial response according to RECIST criteria, or stable disease with 6-month PFS. Grade ≥ 1 irAEs were observed in 15/41 participants. The abundance of Intestinimonas butyriciproducens (q-value = 0.002) and Longicatena caecimuris (q-value = 0.003) were enriched in responders, Tenericutes (q-value= 0.001) and Lachnospira sp. NSJ 43 (q-value =0.002) in non-responders. Blautia luti, as well as several other Lachnospiraceae, were associated with response and no irAE (response q-value = 0.02, no irAE q-value = 0.02). The association of response to ICIs with several taxa in the family Lachnospiraceae, a prevalent microbial family in the gut, is consistent with prior research, which has found that this family may influence treatment outcomes through various mechanisms, such as immune regulation, metabolism, and pathogen exclusion. While no statistical relationship was observed between response and irAEs in this cohort, the microbes associated with both could serve as biomarkers. Future studies to assign causal roles for (specific microbes) in response and toxicity could identify mechanisms to improve patient outcomes.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical TrialNCT05102773
Funding StatementThis study was funded by: Pelotonia, clinical trial award (DS) National Institutes of Aging grant 1K01AG070310 (DS) The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The Ohio State University College of Medicine Clinical Research Center/Center for Clinical Research Management
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This prospective observational cohort study was approved by the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center (OSUCCC) Institutional Review Board (protocol 2019C0151) and registered as NCT05102773.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
留言 (0)